Re: alternate pop auth scheme, not APOP

2000-05-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 03:37:01PM +0100, Graeme Mathieson wrote: > One word of warning with that method. If you're using NFS, make sure > NFS file locking is supported by the clients and the server. Otherwise > you'll wind up with mysterious mailbox corruption. Unless you use maildirs, which

Re: alternate pop auth scheme, not APOP

2000-05-15 Thread Graeme Mathieson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, "Markus Stausberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I dont want to use APOP auth, because not all of the clients can > say that word (e.g. kmail, as of slink), but is it true that the only > alternative is to store a worthy login passwd at every c

alternate pop auth scheme, not APOP

2000-05-15 Thread Markus Stausberg
Hi List, during (part of) the weekend i was configuring email service in a LAN and came upon setting up a central pop server. I dont want to use APOP auth, because not all of the clients can say that word (e.g. kmail, as of slink), but is it true that the only alternative is to store a worthy