Re: allowing root X apps

2001-11-03 Thread Guy Geens
> "Justin" == Justin R Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Justin> What is the best, most secure way to allow root to run X-based Justin> apps while I'm logged in as my non-privileged user? I've tried Justin> xhost +localhost and that does not seem to do the trick. Have a look at sux: http://f

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-31 Thread Marc Wilson
I meant cdrecord of course, sorry for any confusion. Does something called "cdroast" even exist? On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 09:24:32PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 07:24:21PM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > > > If root has to run the GUI file a bug against it. > > Well, cdroast

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-31 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 09:24:32PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 07:24:21PM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > > If root has to run the GUI file a bug against it. Yep! > Well, cdroast itself has to run as root or with root privs... just giving > the user access to the device isn't

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-30 Thread Marc Wilson
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 07:24:21PM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > If root has to run the GUI file a bug against it. Well, cdroast itself has to run as root or with root privs... just giving the user access to the device isn't enough as cdroast complains about system calls it can't use. OTOH, xcdroa

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-30 Thread John Hasler
I wrote: > Not at all. Such [X] applications are not secure enough to be run as > root. Hans Ekbrand writes: > What about xcdroast? What about it? Why anyone would want a GUI for such a thing is something I'll never understand. > As far as I remember, root had to run it once and set it up befo

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-30 Thread Hans Ekbrand
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 10:00:16PM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > Justin R. Miller wrote: > > What is the best, most secure way to allow root to run X-based apps > > while I'm logged in as my non-privileged user? > > Not at all. Such applications are not secure enough to be run as root. > What abou

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-29 Thread Mark Carroll
On 28 Oct 2001, John Hasler wrote: > Mark writes: > > Security isn't always such an issue. > > Stability is. Think of the damage a crashing Gnome application could do > running as root. More important, though, is the bad habit this sort of Sure, but I don't use Gnome, and I don't touch fancy wi

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-28 Thread Benjamin Black
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001 22:10:12 -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote: > What is the best, most secure way to allow root to run X-based apps > while I'm logged in as my non-privileged user? I've tried xhost > +localhost and that does not seem to do the trick. > if you're not worried about local users hija

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-28 Thread John Patton
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 10:08:48PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote: > What is the best, most secure way to allow root to run X-based apps > while I'm logged in as my non-privileged user? I've tried xhost > +localhost and that does not seem to do the trick. This is what I do, which consistently work

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-28 Thread John Hasler
Mark writes: > Security isn't always such an issue. Stability is. Think of the damage a crashing Gnome application could do running as root. More important, though, is the bad habit this sort of thing creates. There is nothing you need to do as root that can't be done from a console. -- John H

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-28 Thread Mark Carroll
On 28 Oct 2001, John Hasler wrote: > Justin R. Miller wrote: > > What is the best, most secure way to allow root to run X-based apps > > while I'm logged in as my non-privileged user? > > Not at all. Such applications are not secure enough to be run as root. Security isn't always such an issue.

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-28 Thread Mark Carroll
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Justin R. Miller wrote: > What is the best, most secure way to allow root to run X-based apps > while I'm logged in as my non-privileged user? I've tried xhost > +localhost and that does not seem to do the trick. ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] works for me. Avoid xhost like the plagu

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-28 Thread John Hasler
Justin R. Miller wrote: > What is the best, most secure way to allow root to run X-based apps > while I'm logged in as my non-privileged user? Not at all. Such applications are not secure enough to be run as root. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI

Re: allowing root X apps

2001-10-28 Thread Mark Ferlatte
Set the environment variable XAUTHORITY=$HOME/.Xauthority, and then su or sudo, and then you should be able to run X apps on the local machine as root. M On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 10:08:48PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote: > What is the best, most secure way to allow root to run X-based apps > while

allowing root X apps

2001-10-28 Thread Justin R. Miller
What is the best, most secure way to allow root to run X-based apps while I'm logged in as my non-privileged user? I've tried xhost +localhost and that does not seem to do the trick. -- Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP/GnuPG Key ID 0xC9C40C31 (preferred) pgpUfhpLuiv5g.pgp Description: