Re: Y2K (Re: Vera and SIOCADDRT - separate subjects)

2000-01-07 Thread Oliver Elphick
John wrote: >I have only just seen your message. The error is in the email program >made available to me by my ISP when I signed on some 20 months ago. >I had noted the problem with incoming mail, but did not think it would >affect outgoing mail onto other machines. If I've caused any dif

Re: Y2K (Re: Vera and SIOCADDRT - separate subjects)

2000-01-06 Thread John
on 06 Jan, Oliver Elphick wrote... > I have only just seen your message. The error is in the email program made available to me by my ISP when I signed on some 20 months ago. I had noted the problem with incoming mail, but did not think it would affect outgoing mail onto other machines. If I've

Re: Y2K (Re: Vera and SIOCADDRT - separate subjects)

2000-01-06 Thread David Wright
Quoting Nico De Ranter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > The original sender uses a broken mail program. It's not on your side. > > Nico > > On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Oliver Elphick wrote: > > > This message to debian-user shows an invalid date; (year 100). I have > > seen a couple of others like this on a

Re: Y2K (Re: Vera and SIOCADDRT - separate subjects)

2000-01-06 Thread Nico De Ranter
The original sender uses a broken mail program. It's not on your side. Nico On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Oliver Elphick wrote: > This message to debian-user shows an invalid date; (year 100). I have > seen a couple of others like this on a non-debian list, where another > subscriber did not see the er

Y2K (Re: Vera and SIOCADDRT - separate subjects)

2000-01-06 Thread Oliver Elphick
This message to debian-user shows an invalid date; (year 100). I have seen a couple of others like this on a non-debian list, where another subscriber did not see the error. I want to establish whether the error is on my machine or on the original poster's. John wrote: > Received: from murphy.de