Volkan YAZICI put forth on 10/21/2010 5:04 AM:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Volkan YAZICI writes:
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner writes:
>>> What write operations were you performing at the time you pulled the plug?
>>> Unless you were writing the superblock it'd be almost impossible to hose the
In <4cc060b6.9060...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
>On 10/21/2010 10:27 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>[snip]
>
>> BTW, a kill -9 ... the application is allowed to do it's own cleanup;
>
>Are you sure? SIGKILL is the unignorable "die *now*".
Sorry, there is a missing "not" there. My point was
On 10/21/2010 10:27 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
[snip]
BTW, a kill -9 ... the application is allowed to do it's own cleanup;
Are you sure? SIGKILL is the unignorable "die *now*".
Or are you confusing it with "kill -TERM", which *does* allow cleanup?
--
Seek truth from facts.
--
To U
In <87fwvzuaec@alamut.ozu.edu.tr>, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Volkan YAZICI writes:
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner writes:
>>> What write operations were you performing at the time you pulled the
>>> plug? Unless you were writing the superblock it'd be almost impossible
On 10/21/2010 12:04 PM, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Volkan YAZICI writes:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner writes:
What write operations were you performing at the time you pulled the plug?
Unless you were writing the superblock it'd be almost impossible to hose the
filesystem
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Volkan YAZICI writes:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner writes:
>> What write operations were you performing at the time you pulled the plug?
>> Unless you were writing the superblock it'd be almost impossible to hose the
>> filesystem to the point it couldn't mount. Were
6 matches
Mail list logo
