Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-10 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On 9/10/13, Kailash wrote: > On Thursday 05 September 2013 07:48 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> On 9/5/13, Nate Bargmann wrote: >>> * On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error: > > (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING *

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-10 Thread Kailash
On Thursday 05 September 2013 07:48 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On 9/5/13, Nate Bargmann wrote: >> * On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote: Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error: (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-05 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On 9/5/13, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> > Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error: >> > >> > (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18: >> > Not using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'. >> > >> >

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-05 Thread Nate Bargmann
* On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error: > > > > (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18: > > Not using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'. > > > > Evince error: > > > > (evince:15620): Gtk

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-05 Thread Zenaan Harkness
> Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error: > > (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18: > Not using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'. > > Evince error: > > (evince:15620): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18: > Not using units i

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-05 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On 9/5/13, Kailash wrote: > On Sunday 01 September 2013 08:24 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked. >>> >>> Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have >>> been happy since. >>

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-04 Thread Kailash
On Sunday 01 September 2013 08:24 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: >>> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked. >> >> Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have >> been happy since. > > I find it adequate; ~8months now

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-03 Thread Frank Lanitz
Am 01.09.2013 08:22, schrieb Joel Rees: > 've been looking at geany, and it looks interesting functionally, but > I'm not at all sold on it. Don't like lots of tool panes all over. > It's part of the reason I can't quite bring myself to use either > netbeans or eclipse regularly. Most of them can

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-03 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 11:43 +0900, Joel Rees wrote: > Hmm. I think I have seen that kind of thing once, some years ago, but > not recently. I think it was with a less stable version of LXDE > (running a Fedora security tools live USB). I've seen it before too, but don't remember the reason for thi

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-03 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 02:02 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > http://upmart.org/gedit-menus-example.jpg That's really odd :(. When using gedit on Xfce (different distros, including Ubuntu/Debian) it's ok on my machine. I agree there seems to be some lib(s) missing. Xfce was and for some installs sti

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-01 Thread Joel Rees
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On 9/2/13, Joel Rees wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >>> On 9/1/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > better job for GTK + Qt apps than GNOME did an

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-01 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On 9/2/13, Joel Rees wrote: > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> On 9/1/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >>> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >>> better job for GTK + Qt apps than GNOME did and Mate does. For GNOME and >>> Mate Qt apps were/are an issue. P

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-01 Thread Joel Rees
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On 9/1/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >>> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu >>> bar of gedit (and I've seen it elsewhere I think), all the menus are

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-01 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On 9/1/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu >> bar of gedit (and I've seen it elsewhere I think), all the menus are >> jammed up against each other - no nice spacing between the

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-01 Thread Jape Person
On 09/01/2013 02:22 AM, Joel Rees wrote: ... > > I've been looking at geany, and it looks interesting functionally, but > I'm not at all sold on it. Don't like lots of tool panes all over. > It's part of the reason I can't quite bring myself to use either > netbeans or eclipse regularly. > ... A

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-09-01 Thread Joe
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 12:54:07 +1000 Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > >> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked. > > > > Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have > > been happy since. > > I find it adequate; ~8months n

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-08-31 Thread Joel Rees
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: >>> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked. >> >> Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have >> been happy since. > > I find it adequate; ~8months now; I a

Re: XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-08-31 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu > bar of gedit (and I've seen it elsewhere I think), all the menus are > jammed up against each other - no nice spacing between them. Anyone > know what I ought to inst

XFCE4 - gedit - was Re: Thanks

2013-08-31 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: >> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked. > > Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have > been happy since. I find it adequate; ~8months now; I am however reasonable with the command line. I don't like mousepad