On Thursday 14 September 2017 11:23:10 David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 14 Sep 2017 at 10:59:01 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 September 2017 10:40:48 Frank wrote:
> > > Op 14-09-17 om 14:15 schreef to...@tuxteam.de:
> > > > I know, with pop3 you can theoretically leave your mail at t
On Thu 14 Sep 2017 at 10:59:01 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 14 September 2017 10:40:48 Frank wrote:
>
> > Op 14-09-17 om 14:15 schreef to...@tuxteam.de:
> > > I know, with pop3 you can theoretically leave your mail at the
↑↑↑
On Thursday 14 September 2017 10:40:48 Frank wrote:
> Op 14-09-17 om 14:15 schreef to...@tuxteam.de:
> > I know, with pop3 you can theoretically leave your mail at the
> > server, but... the protocol makes it very difficult to see that
> > you don't download mails twice, or many times.
>
> Not in
Op 14-09-17 om 14:15 schreef to...@tuxteam.de:
I know, with pop3 you can theoretically leave your mail at the
server, but... the protocol makes it very difficult to see that
you don't download mails twice, or many times.
Not in my experience. What makes you think it's difficult?
Regards,
Frank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 07:38:57AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
> I'm sort of moving OT, but want to ask: presumably you think IMAP is
> preferable to POP3--what makes you say that (in general)?
POP3 is only useful if you plan to always g
5 matches
Mail list logo