on Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:46:38AM +0100, Magnus von Koeller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Wednesday 17 December 2003 00:55, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > in the old days ?memory was say 4K total ...
>
> Yeah, I was just wondering because on my laptop, complete with
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 00:55, Alvin Oga wrote:
> in the old days memory was say 4K total ...
Yeah, I was just wondering because on my laptop, complete with KDE
desktop and tons of programs running and all, 512MB RAM and something
like 270MB of swap, my swap is 99% free. I'm not sugg
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:55:27PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> 30 years later, its easier/cheaper to just add a new stick of memory
> - having "some swap" prevents your system from doing a
> random self-reboot or hanging forever whenever it runs out
> of "virtual memory"
Don't know
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Magnus von Koeller wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 December 2003 22:12, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > > SWAP - 1.5GB
> >
> > Rule of thumb: 1-2x RAM.
>
> I never understood that rule... In what way does it make sense that I
> need more swap because I have more RAM? Seriously, I'd rea
4 matches
Mail list logo
