Jan Schledermann wrote:
> Angelo wrote:
>
>
>> Jan Schledermann wrote:
>>
>>> Angelo Bertolli wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> And if I turn off WEP, then I'm able to connect either way.
>>
>> I kind of figured someone else might be going through this because it's
>> happening on both my des
Angelo wrote:
> Jan Schledermann wrote:
>> Angelo Bertolli wrote:
>>
>>
> And if I turn off WEP, then I'm able to connect either way.
>
> I kind of figured someone else might be going through this because it's
> happening on both my desktop and my laptop. But then again, both
> machines have
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 11:27:12PM +0100, David Jardine wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 02:48:42PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > WEP, is the equivalent of leaving the bank vault open at night with a
> > sign hanging on it saying "Please stay out." Yes, honest people will
> > o
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 02:48:42PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> [...]
> WEP, is the equivalent of leaving the bank vault open at night with a
> sign hanging on it saying "Please stay out." Yes, honest people will
> oeby. Of course, not everyone is honest.
And Debian is ready to help those
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 01:31:15PM -0500, Angelo wrote:
>
>> It's been useful to me ;) But I guess I might have to switch to
>> blocking people by mac add... just seems like a hassel to have to add a
>> new machine each time.
>>
>>
> Except that MAC addresses
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 02:37:31PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
>
> So I guess you leave your car unlocked then. Anyone who really wants to
> get into your car can do so pretty easily, usually without much in the
> way of tools either. (I did it with a coat hanger before.) This is how
> I see
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 01:31:15PM -0500, Angelo wrote:
>
> It's been useful to me ;) But I guess I might have to switch to
> blocking people by mac add... just seems like a hassel to have to add a
> new machine each time.
>
Except that MAC addresses can be verily easily spoofed. It would not
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:08:58AM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
Hey everyone, I was wondering if anyone was having a similar problem: I
can connect to my wireless network using ndiswrapper, but only if I have
WEP encryption turned off. Otherwise, it never connects
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:08:58AM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
Hey everyone, I was wondering if anyone was having a similar problem: I
can connect to my wireless network using ndiswrapper, but only if I have
WEP encryption turned off. Otherwise, it never connects
Jan Schledermann wrote:
Angelo Bertolli wrote:
Hey everyone, I was wondering if anyone was having a similar problem: I
can connect to my wireless network using ndiswrapper, but only if I have
WEP encryption turned off. Otherwise, it never connects. I tried with
Ubuntu a while back, and it
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:08:58AM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
> Hey everyone, I was wondering if anyone was having a similar problem: I
> can connect to my wireless network using ndiswrapper, but only if I have
> WEP encryption turned off. Otherwise, it never connects. I tried with
> Ubuntu a
Angelo Bertolli wrote:
> Hey everyone, I was wondering if anyone was having a similar problem: I
> can connect to my wireless network using ndiswrapper, but only if I have
> WEP encryption turned off. Otherwise, it never connects. I tried with
> Ubuntu a while back, and it worked fine. Anyone
Hey everyone, I was wondering if anyone was having a similar problem: I
can connect to my wireless network using ndiswrapper, but only if I have
WEP encryption turned off. Otherwise, it never connects. I tried with
Ubuntu a while back, and it worked fine. Anyone know why Debian would
have any p
13 matches
Mail list logo
