On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 01:39:32AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> I keep a list of AV vendor email addresses handy which I forward all of
> such misdirected list mails to. Figuring that if enough people do this,
> the AV vendors will take pains that their customers set the products up
> right.
D
on Fri, Nov 22, 2002, Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 06:49:13PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > Colin Watson writes:
> > > They are of no significance. Viruses frequently forge the source address
> > > of e-mails, and it's not uncommon for lists to be those forged a
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 05:03:38PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> This list allows non-subscribers to post, right? Why is that?
In the spirit of being open to the community at large. I don't
particularly see a problem with this, I'm willing to take the good
with the bad.
Though people really ne
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:31:30 -0800
Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 01:16 AM 11/22/02 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 05:03:38PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> >> This list allows non-subscribers to post, right? Why is that?
> >
> >If you've been around for a bit
Colin Watson writes:
> It doesn't help that Klez and kin typically forge the envelope sender,
> thus meaning that even correct systems end up appearing like incompetent
> bunglers.
I know that, and so should those who manage the virus scanners. That's why
I'm calling them bunglers for sending not
At 01:16 AM 11/22/02 +, Colin Watson wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 05:03:38PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
>> This list allows non-subscribers to post, right? Why is that?
>
>If you've been around for a bit, you'll have seen really quite frequent
>posts from people saying "I can't handle the
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 05:03:38PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> This list allows non-subscribers to post, right? Why is that?
If you've been around for a bit, you'll have seen really quite frequent
posts from people saying "I can't handle the volume of this list, so I'm
not subscribed; please c
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 06:49:13PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > They are of no significance. Viruses frequently forge the source address
> > of e-mails, and it's not uncommon for lists to be those forged addresses.
>
> It's irritating that the incompetent bunglers that mana
At 06:49 PM 11/21/02 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
>Colin Watson writes:
>> They are of no significance. Viruses frequently forge the source address
>> of e-mails, and it's not uncommon for lists to be those forged addresses.
>
>It's irritating that the incompetent bunglers that manage these so-called
Colin Watson writes:
> They are of no significance. Viruses frequently forge the source address
> of e-mails, and it's not uncommon for lists to be those forged addresses.
It's irritating that the incompetent bunglers that manage these so-called
"virus scanners" allow them to send out these notice
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:15:55AM +, Pigeon wrote:
> Forgive me if this is a fik question, but are these virus warnings of
> any significance? They turn up every now and then, but I've never had
> the list make my virus scanner scream.
They are of no significance. Viruses frequently forge the
Pigeon writes:
> Forgive me if this is a fik question, but are these virus warnings of any
> significance?
No. They are receiving Klez viruses with the mailing-list address forged
in them and their buggy software is sending out those useless notices.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler
Forgive me if this is a fik question, but are these virus warnings of
any significance? They turn up every now and then, but I've never had
the list make my virus scanner scream.
Pigeon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Su correo contenía virus en alguno de los anexos. Por favor, si se le
indica que el fichero no se ha podido limpiar y ha sido borrado envíe de
nuevo el correo sin virus. Gracias
Date: 11/21/2002 21:55:50
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:nav-B_portefeuille-2[1].bat
From: debian-user <[
Su correo contenía virus en alguno de los anexos. Por favor, si se le
indica que el fichero no se ha podido limpiar y ha sido borrado envíe de
nuevo el correo sin virus. Gracias
Date: 11/8/2002 12:4:33
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:Utd..exe
From: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Su correo contenía virus en alguno de los anexos. Por favor, si se le
indica que el fichero no se ha podido limpiar y ha sido borrado envíe de
nuevo el correo sin virus. Gracias
Date: 11/8/2002 8:59:6
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:financ_busca[1].exe
From: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTE
Su correo contenía virus en alguno de los anexos. Por favor, si se le
indica que el fichero no se ha podido limpiar y ha sido borrado envíe de
nuevo el correo sin virus. Gracias
Date: 10/31/2002 5:25:39
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:bgcolor.pif
From: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Su correo contenía virus en alguno de los anexos. Por favor, si se le
indica que el fichero no se ha podido limpiar y ha sido borrado envíe de
nuevo el correo sin virus. Gracias
Date: 10/3/2002 11:47:10
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:width.pif
From: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Su correo contenía virus en alguno de los anexos. Por favor, si se le
indica que el fichero no se ha podido limpiar y ha sido borrado envíe de
nuevo el correo sin virus. Gracias
Date: 9/23/2002 10:40:15
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:logo[1].exe
From: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ScanMail has detected a virus during a real-time scan of the email traffic.
Date: 9/3/2002 14:4:58
Subject: A new website
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:EPLQ800.pif
From: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Action: Uncleanable, Deleted;
Scanned by S
20 matches
Mail list logo
