On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 09:07:15PM -0800, nate wrote:
> will trillich said:
> > couldn't get the ~elphick/postgresql apt thingie to work, so i'm
> > omitting that for now (hopefully the official woody version will work) and
> > i went and did
> >
> > apt-get update
> >
> > apt-get upgrade
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 04:14, will trillich wrote:
> couldn't get the ~elphick/postgresql apt thingie to work, so i'm
I think that is now fixed. Please, let me know.
--
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.c
will trillich said:
> couldn't get the ~elphick/postgresql apt thingie to work, so i'm
> omitting that for now (hopefully the official woody version will work) and
> i went and did
>
> apt-get update
>
> apt-get upgrade
try apt-get dist-upgrade
nate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
couldn't get the ~elphick/postgresql apt thingie to work, so i'm
omitting that for now (hopefully the official woody version will work)
and i went and did
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
49 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 264 not
upgraded.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 08:09:31AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:31:45PM -0800, nate wrote:
> > will trillich said:
> >
> > > attached is the /var/log/XFree86.0.log file (sorry for the size)... hope
> > > it sheds some light on this. i'd love to get X working
> > > again
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 08:09:31AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:31:45PM -0800, nate wrote:
> > will trillich said:
> >
> > > attached is the /var/log/XFree86.0.log file (sorry for the size)... hope
> > > it sheds some light on this. i'd love to get X working
> > > again
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:31:45PM -0800, nate wrote:
> will trillich said:
>
> > attached is the /var/log/XFree86.0.log file (sorry for the size)... hope
> > it sheds some light on this. i'd love to get X working
> > again. (why was it so easy in potato? was i just lucky?)
>
> sounds to me like
will trillich said:
> attached is the /var/log/XFree86.0.log file (sorry for the size)... hope
> it sheds some light on this. i'd love to get X working
> again. (why was it so easy in potato? was i just lucky?)
sounds to me like /dev/mouse doesn't point to your mouse device. this
is a very common
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:08:50PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:38:04AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > and then i do
> >
> > XFree86 -xf86config /root/XF86Config.new
> >
> > just like it says, and the bilge-plate bitmap pattern comes up
> > (the generic X backgr
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:38:04AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
[ snip ]
> To test the server, run 'XFree86 -xf86config /root/XF86Config.new'
>
> <
>
> and then i do
>
> XFree86 -xf86config /root/XF86Config.new
>
> just like it says, and the bilge-plate bitmap pattern comes up
> (the
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 06:31:48AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
> > under potato i had X up and running like a champ.
> >
> > now i've "dist-upgrade"d to woody ...
>
> Try 'XFree86 -configure' If it detects your hardware, it will produce the
> proper XF86Conf
In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
> under potato i had X (and kde2 thanks to some unofficial
> sources.list items) up and running like a champ. occasionally
> konqueror would die colorfully (hit alt-left to go back a few
> pages and boom, only one desktop, no window borders...)
>
> and X windows wo
This one time, at band camp, will trillich said:
> and X windows worked fine under potato.
>
> now i've "dist-upgrade"d to woody and there are a plethora of
> technical questions i'm supposed to know the answers to, in order to
> get X going. such as--
>
> select the desired X server driver
under potato i had X (and kde2 thanks to some unofficial
sources.list items) up and running like a champ. occasionally
konqueror would die colorfully (hit alt-left to go back a few
pages and boom, only one desktop, no window borders...)
and X windows worked fine under potato.
now i've "dist-upgra
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> Dear all -
>
> I have just taken the dive and decided to upgrade (my Dell Latitude Cpi
> 330) to Debian Woody.
>
> After the process was completed, I was no longer taken into Gnome after
> a boot, but ended at the console login prompt without er
This one time, at band camp, Erik van der Meulen said:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:39:13PM +0200, Adam Galant wrote:
>
> > Try 'startx' instead of 'X'. 'X' runs onlu an X-server with no
> > clients which will give you exactly what you described. With
> > 'startx' you should get an X session with
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:39:13PM +0200, Adam Galant wrote:
> Try 'startx' instead of 'X'. 'X' runs onlu an X-server with no clients
> which will give you exactly what you described. With 'startx' you should
> get an X session with a windowmanager you installed (there should be at
> least twm).
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> Dear all -
>
> I have just taken the dive and decided to upgrade (my Dell Latitude Cpi
> 330) to Debian Woody.
>
> After the process was completed, I was no longer taken into Gnome after
> a boot, but ended at the console login prompt without er
Dear all -
I have just taken the dive and decided to upgrade (my Dell Latitude Cpi
330) to Debian Woody.
After the process was completed, I was no longer taken into Gnome after
a boot, but ended at the console login prompt without error messages.
If I typed 'X' there, I would see error messages
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:41:04AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> (xbase-clients, rather - your reply just went to me, sorry I didn't
get
> round to responding.)
Oops, hit the wrong key.
> I *think* the problem is in apt, not xbase-clients. If you had startx
> before the upgrade, you had xbase-
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:41:04AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> (xbase-clients, rather - your reply just went to me, sorry I didn't get
> round to responding.)
Oops, hit the wrong key.
> I *think* the problem is in apt, not xbase-clients. If you had startx
> before the upgrade, you had xbase-clie
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:31:06PM -0400, William Burrow wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 01:35:39AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > What package did you end up needing to install? Was that all you had to
> > > do?
> >
> > Maybe xserver-xfree86, which
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 01:35:39AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What package did you end up needing to install? Was that all you had to
> > do?
>
> Maybe xserver-xfree86, which is only Suggested: by xserver-common?
I sent a reply, but I don't see it on
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 08:14:11PM -0400, William Burrow wrote:
> > It seems that after completing the upgrade from potato to woody, that X
> > was completely unusable. After a few hours searching around for the
> > appropriate package, downloading and i
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 08:14:11PM -0400, William Burrow wrote:
> It seems that after completing the upgrade from potato to woody, that X
> was completely unusable. After a few hours searching around for the
> appropriate package, downloading and installing, I got X working again.
What package
It seems that after completing the upgrade from potato to woody, that X
was completely unusable. After a few hours searching around for the
appropriate package, downloading and installing, I got X working again.
I am wondering if anybody has had this problem and filed a bug report on
it yet? D
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:37:25AM +0200, Miquel Martin wrote:
> Upon running postfix, it gave out no error messages but did not really
> start. Examination of mail.log gave:
> _servername_ postfix/master[12060]: fatal: bind _your_ip_here_ port 25:
> Address already in use
>
> The problem turned
Hi all!
I finally cracked the problem, but it's driven me crazy. With a working
postfix in potato (postfix 0.0.19991231pl11-1) I updated to woody, and thus,
also to the new postfix (postfix 0.0.20010502.SNAPSHOT-5).
Upon running postfix, it gave out no error messages but did not really
start. Exam
Hi,
it's a problem :)
the solution is:
apt-get install perl5.6
-Jon
I have been trying to upgrade (apt-get) to woody. The download process was
interrupted several times, data sockets timed out, ppp connection fell, etc,
and by following the "try --fix-missing" prompts, I ended up with a partially
downloaded and partially installed upgrade. Then going back to comple
30 matches
Mail list logo
