On Mon 18 Nov 2024 at 14:10:00 (+0100), Klaus Singvogel wrote:
>
> Yesterday I upgraded my Debian Bookworm on my Thinkpad T14 Gen4 laptop.
>
> After rebooting I lost my wifi.
>
> dmesg reported that the iwlwifi module failed with ucode (-2).
> I finally fixed it by installing the iwlwifi-firmwar
On 2024-11-18, Klaus Singvogel wrote:
> I finally fixed it by installing the iwlwifi-firmware package from
> bookworm-backports:
> apt install -t bookworm-backports iwlwifi-firmware
You mean
apt install -t bookworm-backports firmware-iwlwifi
Hello,
Yesterday I upgraded my Debian Bookworm on my Thinkpad T14 Gen4 laptop.
After rebooting I lost my wifi.
dmesg reported that the iwlwifi module failed with ucode (-2).
I finally fixed it by installing the iwlwifi-firmware package from
bookworm-backports:
apt install -t bookworm-ba
On 1/30/24 1:43 PM, Michael Kjörling wrote:
https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#file-conflicts
should help.
Sure. Thanks!
On 1/30/24 1:40 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-S65GMD/8-marco-common_1.24.1-3_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite
'/usr/share/themes/Gorilla/metacity-1/metacity-theme-1.xml', which is
also in package gnome-themes-more 0.9.0.deb0.8
Where do you get 'gnome-themes-more' from
On 1/30/24 1:41 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +0100, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
Unpacking marco-common (1.24.1-3) over (1.20.3-1) ...
.[1mdpkg:.[0m error processing archive
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-S65GMD/8-marco-common_1.24.1-3_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite
'/
On 30 Jan 2024 13:19 +0100, from sko...@uns.ac.rs (Miroslav Skoric):
> Preparing to unpack .../8-marco-common_1.24.1-3_all.deb ...
> Unpacking marco-common (1.24.1-3) over (1.20.3-1) ...
> .[1mdpkg:.[0m error processing archive
> /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-S65GMD/8-marco-common_1.24.1-3_all.deb (--unpac
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +0100, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> Unpacking marco-common (1.24.1-3) over (1.20.3-1) ...
> .[1mdpkg:.[0m error processing archive
> /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-S65GMD/8-marco-common_1.24.1-3_all.deb (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite
> '/usr/share/themes/Gorilla/metacity-1
On 2024-01-30 at 07:19, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I [partially] upgraded buster to bullseye according to official "Release
> Notes for Debian 11 (bullseye), 32-bit PC" (October 4, 2023). I did it
> in two sessions as suggested:
>
> "4.4.4 Minimal system upgrade" (# apt upgrade --without
Hi,
I [partially] upgraded buster to bullseye according to official "Release
Notes for Debian 11 (bullseye), 32-bit PC" (October 4, 2023). I did it
in two sessions as suggested:
"4.4.4 Minimal system upgrade" (# apt upgrade --without-new-pkgs). That
part performed without any issue, and cat
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017, at 17:52, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sat, 04 Feb 2017, Mike Nunn wrote:
>
> >> /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-block/ORDER ignored: not
> >> executable
>
> > Is /tmp mounted "noexec"? Just Don't Do It[tm]. The system will break
On 5 February 2017 at 17:08, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Knowing Hetzner, I doubt they will be helpful.
They suggested changing the nvme disks though I thought this should
only be a last resort.
I tried your earlier suggestion and upgraded to 4.9 kernel from
backports all seems well with sync!
Thanks
Mike Nunn wrote:
> It's Hetzners standard build on their hardware so will follow up with
> them, as you say something seriously wrong.
Knowing Hetzner, I doubt they will be helpful.
S°
--
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
On 5 February 2017 at 15:31, Sven Hartge wrote:
> You can unfuzz your package system by temporarily commenting the call to
> "sync" in update-initramfs to get it to complete, but you really should
> try to find out the real problem.
Package system unfuzzed, thanks!
It's Hetzners standard build o
Mike Nunn wrote:
> On 5 February 2017 at 14:47, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Please test if just calling "strace sync" as root hangs as well.
> Yes it does
> strace sync
> .
> open("/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2855
On 5 February 2017 at 14:47, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Can you please check if process 12056 is "/bin/sync"? Search for a line
> above looking like
> 3400 execve("/bin/sync", ["sync"], [/* 23 vars */]) = 0
Yes it is:
12056 execve("/bin/sync", ["sync"], [/* 18 vars */]) = 0
> Please test if just ca
Mike Nunn wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding 7bit, charset: UTF-8, 24 lines --]
> I have an strace output for the following:
> strace -f -o foo update-initramfs -u -v
> It stopped at the following line as usual:
> Building cpio /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64.new initramfs
> The last few lines
On 5 February 2017 at 13:33, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> In addition to Ric's "Please don't top post".
OK will do Thanks, Is it worth starting a new thread as the problem is now
much more specific?
Mike
And please don't break threads.
In addition to Ric's "Please don't top post".
This email above which I am top posting requires a lot of effort on the part
of any potential helper. No "history". Thread broken. Replied to wrong
email .
Lisi
On Sunday 05 February 2017 11:24:34 Mike Nunn w
I have an strace output for the following:
strace -f -o foo update-initramfs -u -v
It stopped at the following line as usual:
Building cpio /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64.new initramfs
The last few lines of the strace output:
12056 open("/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) =
On 02/04/2017 03:25 PM, Mike Nunn wrote:
Please don't top post. Thanx, Ric
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
http://linuxcounter.net/user/44256.htm
update-initramfs pid 1373
sudo lsof -p 1373
COMMANDPID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
update-in 1373 root cwdDIR9,2 4096 16515073 /root
update-in 1373 root rtdDIR9,2 40962 /
update-in 1373 root txtREG9,2 125400 23461891 /bin/dash
upd
df
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/md2 458453504 6569528 428572808 2% /
udev 10240 0 10240 0% /dev
tmpfs 13187516 320656 12866860 3% /run
tmpfs 32968784 504 32968280 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 5120
Mike Nunn wrote:
> can't install strace as apt suggests running dpkg --configure -a , prob due
> to the failure of the upgrade
> with update-initramfs -u -v -k 3.16.0-4-amd64 hung there doesn't seem to be
> a cpio process running
Strange.
If it hangs at "Building cpio /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4
can't install strace as apt suggests running dpkg --configure -a , prob due
to the failure of the upgrade
with update-initramfs -u -v -k 3.16.0-4-amd64 hung there doesn't seem to be
a cpio process running
On 4 February 2017 at 19:02, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Mike Nunn wrote:
> > Sven Hartge wrote
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Feb 2017, Mike Nunn wrote:
>> /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-block/ORDER ignored: not executable
> Is /tmp mounted "noexec"? Just Don't Do It[tm]. The system will break
> in hideously crazy, suprising ways. BTW, this is also valid for
On Sat, 04 Feb 2017, Mike Nunn wrote:
> /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-block/ORDER ignored: not executable
Is /tmp mounted "noexec"? Just Don't Do It[tm]. The system will break
in hideously crazy, suprising ways. BTW, this is also valid for the
filesystem hosting whatever directory $T
Mike Nunn wrote:
> Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Hmm. How long did you wait for it to complete? Is "/boot" full?
>> Or is the disk /boot is on just abysmally slow?
> It's still stuck, been over an hour now. Everything else seems fast,
> no obvious slowdown.
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted o
Sven Hartge wrote:
> Hmm. How long did you wait for it to complete? Is "/boot" full?
> Or is the disk /boot is on just abysmally slow?
It's still stuck, been over an hour now. Everything else seems fast,
no obvious slowdown.
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md1 488M 52M 411
Mike Nunn wrote:
> It seems to stop after the last line shown below.
> Building cpio /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64.new initramfs
Hmm. How long did you wait for it to complete? Is "/boot" full? Or is
the disk /boot is on just abysmally slow?
Grüße,
Sven.
--
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
Thanks for the reply,
It seems to stop after the last line shown below.
update-initramfs -u -v -k 3.16.0-4-amd64
Keeping /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64.dpkg-bak
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64
Copying module directory kernel/drivers/hid
Calling hook zz
Thanks for the reply,
It seems to stop after the last line shown below.
update-initramfs -u -v -k 3.16.0-4-amd64
Keeping /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64.dpkg-bak
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64
Copying module directory kernel/drivers/hid
Calling hook zz-busy
Mike Nunn wrote:
> uname -a 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u2 (2016-10-19) x86_64
> GNU/Linux
> I ran sudo apt update followed by upgrade
> it hangs at the following point:
> Setting up linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 (3.16.39-1) ...
> /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools:
> update-in
uname -a 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u2 (2016-10-19) x86_64
GNU/Linux
I ran sudo apt update followed by upgrade
it hangs at the following point:
Setting up linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 (3.16.39-1) ...
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools:
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.
BTW by installing phonon-backend-null the dist-upgrade can be performed,
but no audio or video could be generated meanwhile a proper backend is not
installed.
--
Javier Parapar
Same situation here, I've tried with several updated mirrors (
http://mirror.debian.org/status.html) and no difference.
According to this
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669278 should
we expect any update in the repositories soon?
Regards,
--
Javier Parapar
Amrish Purohit wrote:
> I have repeated same with latest 6.0.4 kde live dvd, but getting the
> saem result.
>
Hmmm.
Did you run "apt-get update" after changing your sources.list?
--
❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Indulekha
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
Not all Debian mirrors work right ...
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:27:54AM +0530, Amrish Purohit wrote:
...
> >500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main i386 Packages
> >N: Unable to locate package libvlccore4
Change mirror site from http://ftp.us.debian.org to and something else
and tr
apt first,
the do an "upgrade", followed by a "dist-upgrade") and then install the
rest of the system from testing. Your approach is asking for trouble.
Yes, I know that this is good method, but It requires more manual task
to set a working desktop environment.
But dist-upgrade
manual task
to set a working desktop environment.
But dist-upgrade failed with following error.
"E: Could not perform immediate configuration on
'phonon-backend-vlc'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under
APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2)"
I think one or more of the foll
etc.), upgrade this
minimal system carefully to testing (kernel, udev, dpkg, and apt first,
the do an "upgrade", followed by a "dist-upgrade") and then install the
rest of the system from testing. Your approach is asking for trouble.
> But dist-upgrade failed with following error
image ("debian-
> testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso")?
>
>> To convert debian stable in testing, I fired following commands.
>> apt-get update
>> apt-get dist-upgrade
>> But dist-upgrade failed with following error. "E: Could not perform
>> immediate configu
ommands.
> apt-get update
> apt-get dist-upgrade
> But dist-upgrade failed with following error. "E: Could not perform
> immediate configuration on 'phonon-backend-vlc'. Please see man 5
> apt.conf under APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2)"
It could be a
-armor 0xd66b746e | apt-key add -
deb http://download.skype.com/linux/repos/debian/ stable non-free
To convert debian stable in testing, I fired following commands.
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
But dist-upgrade failed with following error.
"E: Could not perform
gt;
> Skype - http://www.skype.com
> ## Run this command: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0xd66b746e
> && gpg --export --armor 0xd66b746e | apt-key add -
> deb http://download.skype.com/linux/repos/debian/ stable non-free
>
> To convert debian stable in t
esting, I fired following commands.
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
But dist-upgrade failed with following error.
"E: Could not perform immediate configuration on 'phonon-backend-vlc'.
Please see man 5 apt.conf under APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2)"
Please help to fix this issue.
Regards
Amrish
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Lukasz Szybalski
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> In the process of upgrading from debian lenny amd64 to debian squeezy
>> amd64 I was able to successfully upgrade to kernel 32 and new udev.
>> Then after reboot I
Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
> In the process of upgrading from debian lenny amd64 to debian squeezy
> amd64 I was able to successfully upgrade to kernel 32 and new udev.
> Then after reboot I followed with apt-get dist-upgrade.
You say "after reboot" and so you must have used grub to reboot,
right?
>
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
> Hello,
> In the process of upgrading from debian lenny amd64 to debian squeezy
> amd64 I was able to successfully upgrade to kernel 32 and new udev.
> Then after reboot I followed with apt-get dist-upgrade.
>
> Everything went fine, but t
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:09:36 -0400 (EDT), Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
> ...
> After restart I can only see "GRUB>".
> ...
> Then I tried "update-grub"
> ...
> Now I get "grub loading...
> no module name found"
> ...
> What should I do now?
> ...
> I would appreciate some guidance on this.
I agree with
On 7/31/2011 11:09 PM, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
> Everything went fine, but towards the end I was asked to upgrade to
> grub-pc.
LILO - Til you pull it from my cold dead hands!
--
Stan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hello,
In the process of upgrading from debian lenny amd64 to debian squeezy
amd64 I was able to successfully upgrade to kernel 32 and new udev.
Then after reboot I followed with apt-get dist-upgrade.
Everything went fine, but towards the end I was asked to upgrade to
grub-pc. During this choice I
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:22:01 -0500 (EST), Oscar Corte wrote:
>
> Just today I upgraded my Debian Lenny Server, many packages
> were upgraded succesfully, but MySQL server wich is not working anymore.
>
> What can I do to restore MySQL server?
>
> Error messages shown are these:
>
> Starting MySQL
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:46:55 -0500 (EST), Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Extra message to say thanks, and to put SOLVED in the subject, and to explain
> exactly how you solved the problem using the various answers you got, is not
> a
> lost time by any mean. (Shame on me: I don't all way spend the tim
On Sunday 07 March 2010 01:07:34 Nuno Magalhães wrote:
>
> Saves time. You will (obviously?) be thankful for replies, thanking in
> advance saves time and an extra message just to say thanks.
>
> My 2¢
>
Extra message to say thanks, and to put SOLVED in the subject, and to explain
exactly how
On 3/6/2010 2:22 PM, Oscar Corte wrote:
Hi all:
Just today I upgraded my Debian Lenny Server, many packages were
upgraded succesfully, but MySQL server wich is not working anymore.
What can I do to restore MySQL server?
Error messages shown are these:
Starting MySQL database server: mysql .
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 23:32, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> I'm not sure that this is the time or the place for this,
>> but I have to admit it irritates me when people say "Thanks in
>> advance." It irritates me primarily because it appears to be
>> an excuse for not saying "thank you" later if someone
On 2010-03-06 16:35, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:22:01 -0500 (EST), Oscar Corte wrote:
[snip]
Thanks in advance for any advice
I'm not sure that this is the time or the place for this,
but I have to admit it irritates me when people say "Thanks in
advance." It irritates me p
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:22:01 -0500 (EST), Oscar Corte wrote:
>
> Just today I upgraded my Debian Lenny Server, many packages
> were upgraded succesfully, but MySQL server wich is not working anymore.
>
> What can I do to restore MySQL server?
>
> Error messages shown are these:
>
> Starting MySQL
Same result. It seems to try to start the server an it fails. I happens too
when using aptitude.
> Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 22:39:40 +0200
> From: brentgclarkl...@gmail.com
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: MySQL upgrade failed PLEASE HELP!!!
>
> On 06/03
Hi:
Manual starting also fails. I'll check the log file
> Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:41:21 -0500
> From: allan_w...@lifeintegrity.com
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: MySQL upgrade failed PLEASE HELP!!!
>
> On 2010-03-06T20:22:01, Oscar Corte wrote:
&
On 2010-03-06T20:22:01, Oscar Corte wrote:
> Error messages shown are these:
>
> Starting MySQL database server: mysql . . . . . failed!
> invoke-rc.d: initscript mysql, action "start" failed.
> dpkg: error processing mysql-server-5.0 (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned
On 06/03/2010 22:22, Oscar Corte wrote:
Error messages shown are these:
Starting MySQL database server: mysql . . . . . failed!
invoke-rc.d: initscript mysql, action "start" failed.
dpkg: error processing mysql-server-5.0 (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit st
Hi all:
Just today I upgraded my Debian Lenny Server, many packages were upgraded
succesfully, but MySQL server wich is not working anymore.
What can I do to restore MySQL server?
Error messages shown are these:
Starting MySQL database server: mysql . . . . . failed!
invoke-rc.d: initscript
On 2009-08-10 18:49, line...@ruiner.halo.nu wrote:
[snip]
The root filesystem is encrypted to make it more difficult for a
local attacker to replace system binaries with backdoored
versions.
I don't think this is a valid reason for encrypting root.
--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer
--
To
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 17:41:48 line...@ruiner.halo.nu wrote:
> Ok I guess the system is just hosed. If no one has any more suggestions in
> the next couple days I will reinstall.
>
>
> I will never trust Debian upgrades again, at least not when encrypted
> filesystems are in use.
Well, all
Ok I guess the system is just hosed. If no one has any more suggestions in the
next couple days I will reinstall.
I will never trust Debian upgrades again, at least not when encrypted
filesystems are in use.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 06:49:51PM -0500, line...@ruiner.halo.nu wrote:
> > hmm
> hmmm not sure, you could try
> turning of quiet mode remove the quiet from the kernel option on boot
> and maybe try turning on debug (add debug to the kernal options)
There is no quiet mode in my kernel line. Adding the debug option didn't seem
to add any additional relevant information;
>
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 19:54:50 line...@ruiner.halo.nu wrote:
> I tried configuring fstab to use the UUID from blkid, but I had the same
> problem. Could the problem be that the SCSI drives are not coming up until
> cryptsetup has loaded?
Hi again lineman (and list).
Just for another da
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 19:21 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06 2009, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 18:50 -0500, line...@halo.nu wrote:
> >> Hi -
> >
> >> I have a Debian Etch system which I recently upgraded to v5.0.2.
> >> The file system was encrypted with LU
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 18:29 -0400, Andrew Reid wrote:
> On Thursday 06 August 2009 04:16:42 Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> > Please bear with me, I'm asking this out of curiousity. Why did you
> > encrypt the full root FS? I can understand that you want your $HOME
> > encrypted, to a lesser degree I c
On Thu, Aug 06 2009, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 18:50 -0500, line...@halo.nu wrote:
>> Hi -
>
>> I have a Debian Etch system which I recently upgraded to v5.0.2.
>> The file system was encrypted with LUKS at install time.
>
> Please bear with me, I'm asking this out of curious
On Thursday 06 August 2009 04:16:42 Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 18:50 -0500, line...@halo.nu wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > I have a Debian Etch system which I recently upgraded to v5.0.2.
> > The file system was encrypted with LUKS at install time.
>
> Please bear with me, I'm asking
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 18:50 -0500, line...@halo.nu wrote:
> Hi -
> I have a Debian Etch system which I recently upgraded to v5.0.2.
> The file system was encrypted with LUKS at install time.
Please bear with me, I'm asking this out of curiousity. Why did you
encrypt the full root FS? I can un
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 19:54:50 line...@ruiner.halo.nu wrote:
> I tried configuring fstab to use the UUID from blkid, but I had the same
> problem. Could the problem be that the SCSI drives are not coming up until
> cryptsetup has loaded?
This could happen if the new kernel's initramfs doe
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:54:50PM -0500, line...@ruiner.halo.nu wrote:
> I tried configuring fstab to use the UUID from blkid, but I had the same
> problem. Could the problem be that the SCSI drives are not coming up until
> cryptsetup has loaded?
hmmm not sure, you could try
turning of quiet
I tried configuring fstab to use the UUID from blkid, but I had the same
problem. Could the problem be that the SCSI drives are not coming up until
cryptsetup has loaded?
Here is some info on my configuration:
t...@magnesium:/etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d$ cat resume
RESUME=/dev/mapper/magnesium
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 06:50:56PM -0500, line...@halo.nu wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I have a Debian Etch system which I recently upgraded to v5.0.2. The file
> system was encrypted with LUKS at install time.
>
> The upgrade appeared to go well, however when I boot into the new system, it
> gives the f
Hi -
I have a Debian Etch system which I recently upgraded to v5.0.2. The file
system was encrypted with LUKS at install time.
The upgrade appeared to go well, however when I boot into the new system, it
gives the following error:
Volume group "hostname" not found
cryptsetup: Source device /d
--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> [pparis...@spartacos][~]$
> id -a
> uid=1000(pparissis) gid=1000(pparissis)
> groups=4(adm),20(dialout),24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),34(backup),40(src),44(video),46(plugdev),1000(pparissis)
> [pparis...@spartacos][~]$ which xvidtune
> /usr/bin/xvidt
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:06:48 -0800 (PST)
S D wrote:
> --- On Tue, 2/17/09, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>
> > You don't need root access in order to run that
> > command.
>
> True, but if I run it as a regular user, it gets even funnier:
>
> $ which xvidtune
> /usr/bin/xvidtune
> $ `which xvidtune`
--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> You don't need root access in order to run that
> command.
True, but if I run it as a regular user, it gets even funnier:
$ which xvidtune
/usr/bin/xvidtune
$ `which xvidtune`
Please install the program before using
$ /usr/bin/xvidtune
Please instal
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:08:26 -0800 (PST)
S D wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 2/17/09, pavlos.paris wrote:
>
> > Try the following
> > 1) inside GNOME/KDE open a terminal and run
> > xvidtune and tune the settings
> > as you wish. Then click on show button, this will
> > print on the terminal th
--- On Tue, 2/17/09, pavlos.paris wrote:
> Try the following
> 1) inside GNOME/KDE open a terminal and run
> xvidtune and tune the settings
> as you wish. Then click on show button, this will
> print on the terminal the setting to be used in
> xorg.conf.
Weird, when I try to run (as root)
2009/2/17 S D
>
> --- On Tue, 2/17/09, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
> > For the "ati" module, you need the package:
> > p xserver-xorg-video-ati - X.Org X server --
> > ATI display driver
>
> Installed the xserver-xorg-video-ati package and it did resolve the issue
> somewhat. I w
I recall seeing something along that line in the , known issues after
installing Lenny , in the install notes. about the display not using all the
screen, they had a fix for it also.
thanks
Norm
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:13 AM, S D wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 2/17/09, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wr
--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Probably need to add some modes or modelines to your
> xorg.conf. Might try
> dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg (or sth like that) to get the
> resolution you
> want.
I checked xorg.conf, it already has 1600x1200 line entries. Besides, the K
On Monday 16 February 2009 21:58:13 S D wrote:
> The picture now, for some reason, doesn't use the whole available screen
> space but leave unused areas about 3-5 cm from the left, right, top and
> bottom monitor edges. It looks something like this:
>
> I usually run my monitor in 1600x1200 mode an
--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> For the "ati" module, you need the package:
> p xserver-xorg-video-ati - X.Org X server --
> ATI display driver
Installed the xserver-xorg-video-ati package and it did resolve the issue
somewhat. I was able to start X and KDE, KD
On Monday 16 February 2009 16:13:29 S D wrote:
> (EE) Failed to load module "ait" (module doesn't exist, 0)
For the "ati" module, you need the package:
p xserver-xorg-video-ati - X.Org X server -- ATI display driver
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasu
After dist-upgrade from etch to lenny, I'm trying to run lenny using 2.6.18
kernel that I have left over from etch, as I'm having issues assembling mdadm
RAID drives under the new 2.6.28 lenny kernel (For more info see
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.user/browse_thread/thread/b97fd9
On 2008-04-14 00:43 +0200, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Last upgrade failed:
> Setting up console-data (2:1.07-1) ...
> no template type specified at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Template.pm line 34,
> chunk 10.
> dpkg: error processing console-data (--configure):
> subprocess
Last upgrade failed:
Setting up console-data (2:1.07-1) ...
no template type specified at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Template.pm line 34,
chunk 10.
dpkg: error processing console-data (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
Errors were encountered while
On 4/10/07, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I tried to uprade a dev server to etch today. The upgrade erred out on mysql
upgrades. I'm told I might want to run 'apt-get -f install'. I've played with
the force option before with bad results. Why are the libs that mysql depends
on not upg
try running apt-get -f install for it to suggest a solution. Sometimes it
is smarter than you are (and sometimes not) The force option simply allows
apt-get to function if your package cache is broken. At least try it before
reinstalling etch clean (although that might be fun)
On 4/9/07, Tom B
On Monday 09 April 2007 14:51, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 14:25 -0700, Tom Brown wrote:
> > I tried to uprade a dev server to etch today. The upgrade erred out on
> > mysql upgrades. I'm told I might want to run 'apt-get -f install'. I've
> > played with the force option before w
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 14:25 -0700, Tom Brown wrote:
> I tried to uprade a dev server to etch today. The upgrade erred out on mysql
> upgrades. I'm told I might want to run 'apt-get -f install'. I've played with
> the force option before with bad results. Why are the libs that mysql depends
> on
Hi,
I tried to uprade a dev server to etch today. The upgrade erred out on mysql
upgrades. I'm told I might want to run 'apt-get -f install'. I've played with
the force option before with bad results. Why are the libs that mysql depends
on not upgraded first? Would it be a better idea to uninst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
When I try to apt to upgrade unstable, it failed. Any comments:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get update
Get:1 http://debian.ustc.edu.cn unstable Release.gpg [189B]
Get:2 http://debian.ustc.edu.cn testing Release.gpg [189B]
Get:3 http://deb
Unpacking konqueror failed because it was unpacked before kdebase-libs,
and the old kdebase-libs (2.2.2-14) shares a file with the new konqueror
package (2.2.2-14.2).
I imagine this is a bug in the dependency information for the security
updates rather than a bug in apt and/or dpkg. I fixed my sys
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
