On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:10:06 +1000, Felix Karpfen wrote
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
> Since posting the above message, I have confirmed that I can (currently)
> use LILO to boot both my installed Sarge and my backup Sarge. I can
> therefore make my queries more concrete. They now read:
>
> a) I woul
This posting - sent via gmane - is my second attempt to send this
posting. If the first attempt ultimately reached its intended
destination, then I apologise for wasting time and bandwidth. The
original message read as follows:
| I have acquired a DVD set of the official release of Debian 4.0 and
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 02:22:22 +0100
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:12:57PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:29:09 -0400
> > Graeme Tank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > and bug #188900 seems fixed.
> >
> > Thanks. But this morning listbu
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 12:37:34AM -0400, Graeme Tank wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:59:55AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Have you tried aptitude? It's like dselect but with a bit more brain.
>
> I recall using aptitude briefly as a Debian novice on stable, but found
> apt-cache (search|sh
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:59:55AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Have you tried aptitude? It's like dselect but with a bit more brain.
I recall using aptitude briefly as a Debian novice on stable, but found
apt-cache (search|show) and apt-get install easier for upgrades within
stable. I can eas
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:12:57PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:29:09 -0400
> Graeme Tank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and bug #188900 seems fixed.
>
> Thanks. But this morning listbugs still says it's open. There isn't much
> point in having this facility if it doesn't
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:12:57PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:29:09 -0400
> Graeme Tank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm using testing:
> > $ dpkg -l binutils
> > ii binutils 2.14.90.0.4-0.1The GNU assembler, linker ...
> >
> > and bug #188900 seems f
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:29:09 -0400
Graeme Tank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, am I right in assuming that the #188900 bug is such that I
> > should avoid upgrading binutils?
> >
> I find dselect useful in these situations. During package selection, you
> can hold a given package. If at a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:29:09AM -0400, Graeme Tank wrote:
> I find dselect useful in these situations. During package selection, you
> can hold a given package. If at a later time you want to unhold it,
> well, choose the unhold option.
Have you tr
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 01:24:50PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
> I have 50 or so testing packages in line for upgrade. Some of these have
> grave bugs open. Some have grave bugs I can live with. Some I don't know
> about.
>
> Is there a way of telling apt to upgrade all _except_ a given package
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:04:01 +0200
Wolfgang Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:50:10 +0200, Richard Kimber wrote:
>
> > I have 50 or so testing packages in line for upgrade. Some of these
> > have grave bugs open. Some have grave bugs I can live with. Some I
> > don't k
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:50:10 +0200, Richard Kimber wrote:
> I have 50 or so testing packages in line for upgrade. Some of these have
> grave bugs open. Some have grave bugs I can live with. Some I don't know
> about.
>
> Is there a way of telling apt to upgrade all _except_ a given package? I'm
I have 50 or so testing packages in line for upgrade. Some of these have
grave bugs open. Some have grave bugs I can live with. Some I don't know
about.
Is there a way of telling apt to upgrade all _except_ a given package? I'm
not keen on dealing with packages one by one.
Also, am I right in a
You don't need woody, potato is fine. The upgrade from the existing
archive or CD's is sweet, see Anne's doc's on the upgrade. Works really
well...
Regards JohnG
John Gould - Systems Support Engineer
Power Innovations Limited
Tel: +44 1234 223002 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No Windows here, 's very
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 11:18:56AM -, Guðmundur Erlingsson wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've put slink on my laptop and it's been sweet so far. I'd like to upgrade
> it to a newer version, with newer kernel, but I'm not sure which is best.
> Should I go for frozen or would Woody be safe? The thing i
Hi there,
I've put slink on my laptop and it's been sweet so far. I'd like to upgrade
it to a newer version, with newer kernel, but I'm not sure which is best.
Should I go for frozen or would Woody be safe? The thing is, I'd like to try
out Helix Gnome, and have to have Woody installed to be able
16 matches
Mail list logo
