"Florentin Ionescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is blackdown java compiled with gcc3.2 - but there is no debian
> package AFAIK and that should solve the problem.
>
> ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.blackdown.org/java-linux/
> JDK-1.4.1/i386/01/j2re-1.4.1-01-linux-i586-gcc3.2.bin
[snip]
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:54:42 -0800 (PST)
Florentin Ionescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is blackdown java compiled with gcc3.2 - but there is no debian
> package AFAIK and that should solve the problem.
>
> ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.blackdown.org/java-linux/
> JDK-1.4.1/i386/01/j2re-
wrote :
» Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 17:11:31 +1100
» From: Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
» To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
» Subject: Re: Unstable/Java/Mozilla
»
» On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 05:19:28PM -0700, Gary Hennigan wrote:
» > I just realized that due to the fact that Mozilla, and it's
» >
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 00:11, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 05:19:28PM -0700, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> > I just realized that due to the fact that Mozilla, and it's
> > descendents, in unstable, is now being built with the 3.2 compilers
> > I'm stuck without a useable Java plugin. Anyone h
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 05:19:28PM -0700, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> I just realized that due to the fact that Mozilla, and it's
> descendents, in unstable, is now being built with the 3.2 compilers
> I'm stuck without a useable Java plugin. Anyone have a solution to
> this? I've been using the 1.4 *.d
I just realized that due to the fact that Mozilla, and it's
descendents, in unstable, is now being built with the 3.2 compilers
I'm stuck without a useable Java plugin. Anyone have a solution to
this? I've been using the 1.4 *.debs from Blackdown, but those appear
to have been compiled with 2.9x co
6 matches
Mail list logo
