On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:57:53PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/21/07 18:13, Pete wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > Thanks Andrew
> > I have a Xubuntu partition that works very well without Gnome but I would
> > like
> > to get to the bottom of why Debian/Gnome will not access the network on the
> >
Thanks guys for all your help on this one. It looks as though it won't be
solved simply. I'll stick with Xubuntu which I know works and which I've
grown to like and just leave Debian sat on the other partition till I either
need the space or find a way of solving it.
> Regards
> Pete Redwood
>
On Monday 21 May 2007 11:37:13 yag wrote:
> Pete wrote:
> > On Monday 21 May 2007 06:19:29 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:32:50AM +0100, Pete wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > I have tried pinging known servers like Google on both the faulty Debian
> > and the working Xubuntu a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/21/07 18:13, Pete wrote:
[snip]
>
> Thanks Andrew
> I have a Xubuntu partition that works very well without Gnome but I would
> like
> to get to the bottom of why Debian/Gnome will not access the network on the
> other partition. Everything e
On Monday 21 May 2007 11:37:13 yag wrote:
> Pete wrote:
> > On Monday 21 May 2007 06:19:29 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:32:50AM +0100, Pete wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > I have tried pinging known servers like Google on both the faulty Debian
> > and the working Xubuntu a
On Monday 21 May 2007 19:54:15 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 09:25:38AM +0100, Pete wrote:
> > On Monday 21 May 2007 06:19:29 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:32:50AM +0100, Pete wrote:
> > > > Just had another thought on this, following another
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 09:25:38AM +0100, Pete wrote:
> On Monday 21 May 2007 06:19:29 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:32:50AM +0100, Pete wrote:
> > > Just had another thought on this, following another thread. Tried 'ifup
> > > -a' to see what would happen. Came back '
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:44:09PM +0100, Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to
say:
> In response to Andrew, not certain if resolv.conf is getting updated. Once
> again not certain how to check.
Type "cat /etc/resolv.conf".
> Ping was by IP address.
Can you ping by hostname? e.g., ping w
Pete wrote:
On Monday 21 May 2007 06:19:29 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:32:50AM +0100, Pete wrote:
[...]
I have tried pinging known servers like Google on both the faulty Debian and
the working Xubuntu and get identical results. /etc/resolv.conf gives
identical resu
On Monday 21 May 2007 06:19:29 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:32:50AM +0100, Pete wrote:
> > Just had another thought on this, following another thread. Tried 'ifup
> > -a' to see what would happen. Came back 'ifup command unknown'.
>
> its in /sbin so you either need the
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:32:50AM +0100, Pete wrote:
>
> Just had another thought on this, following another thread. Tried 'ifup -a'
> to
> see what would happen. Came back 'ifup command unknown'.
its in /sbin so you either need the full path, or do it as root (it
won't work as non-root anyway
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:52:12PM +0100, Pete wrote:
> On Sunday 20 May 2007 19:56:47 H.S. wrote:
> > Pete wrote:
> > > DHCP. Laptop has its own IP address. No idea about name resolution. Not
> > > certain how to check it
> >
> > What is the output of the following commands:
> >
> > $> ping 4.2.2.
wever Epiphany,
> > Iceweasel and Apt all report that "network is unreachable" or "unable to
> > connect to network". Network Setting shows quite clearly that eth0
> > is 'active'. Ping is positive. What am I missing? I have a wired
> >
On Sunday 20 May 2007 19:56:47 H.S. wrote:
> Pete wrote:
> > DHCP. Laptop has its own IP address. No idea about name resolution. Not
> > certain how to check it
>
> What is the output of the following commands:
>
> $> ping 4.2.2.2
>
> $> ping google.com
>
> $> ping
>
>
> ->HS
Curiouser and curiou
Pete wrote:
DHCP. Laptop has its own IP address. No idea about name resolution. Not
certain how to check it
What is the output of the following commands:
$> ping 4.2.2.2
$> ping google.com
$> ping
->HS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
,
Iceweasel and Apt all report that "network is unreachable" or "unable to
connect to network". Network Setting shows quite clearly that eth0
is 'active'. Ping is positive. What am I missing? I have a wired
connection to an adsl router. My laptop running Xubuntu works pe
wever Epiphany,
> > Iceweasel and Apt all report that "network is unreachable" or "unable to
> > connect to network". Network Setting shows quite clearly that eth0
> > is 'active'. Ping is positive. What am I missing? I have a wired
> >
t that "network is unreachable" or "unable to
> connect to network". Network Setting shows quite clearly that eth0
> is 'active'. Ping is positive. What am I missing? I have a wired
> connection to an adsl router. My laptop running Xubuntu works p
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Pete wrote:
Hi
I have already posted this once but somehow managed to post into another
thread so it probably got lost.
Have just installed Etch with Netinstall. No problem. However Epiphany,
Iceweasel and Apt all report that "network is unreachable" or "un
Hi
I have already posted this once but somehow managed to post into another
thread so it probably got lost.
Have just installed Etch with Netinstall. No problem. However Epiphany,
Iceweasel and Apt all report that "network is unreachable" or "unable to
connect to network&qu
20 matches
Mail list logo
