Hi Brian,
On 28-Oct-97 You wrote:
>>>>> Regarding Re: Unable F1-F4 mc running in rxvt; David Puryear
I've tried both versions of rxvt here and they produce the same codes
for the function keys. The only thing that I can guess could be
causing this
>>>>> Regarding Re: Unable F1-F4 mc running in rxvt; David Puryear
>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adds:
David> Download 2.20-3 from bo extracted rxvt to run that without
David> changing anything else, and that worked fine. So, I would
David&g
Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In xemacs for example I get "dead-circumflex is not defined" this makes
> the use of the T-^ command ion gnus somewhat difficult :-)
http://www.math.ethz.ch/~vroonhof/emascs/x-compose.el.gz
Jan
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail th
On 28-Oct-97 Brian Mays wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Puryear) writes:
> When running mc under rxvt, I can't use F1-F4, but I can use them in
> xterm.
> Again, rxvt is from hamm. With the rxvt from bo, I didn't have this
> problem.
Is this a problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Puryear) writes:
> When running mc under rxvt, I can't use F1-F4, but I can use them in xterm.
> Again, rxvt is from hamm. With the rxvt from bo, I didn't have this problem.
Is this a problem with rxvt or with ncurses? The rxvt version in hamm
is not much different than
On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, David Puryear wrote:
> When running mc under rxvt, I can't use F1-F4, but I can use them in xterm.
> Again, rxvt is from hamm. With the rxvt from bo, I didn't have this problem.
>
I can confirm this. Keyboard mapping in X is always somewhat weird. I stay
with rxvt 2.20-3
In
Hi,
When running mc under rxvt, I can't use F1-F4, but I can use them in xterm.
Again, rxvt is from hamm. With the rxvt from bo, I didn't have this problem.
TIA,
David
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROT
7 matches
Mail list logo