Re: Udev ATTR instead of SYSFS

2009-12-13 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Dave Witbrodt wrote: David Baron wrote: Getting a lot of warnings about this on recent udev upgrades. I tried substituting in some of the rules files but might have caused problems. Fact is that this was tested with the recent broken udev and problems were (also?) from

Re: Udev ATTR instead of SYSFS

2009-12-13 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Dave Witbrodt wrote: David Baron wrote: Getting a lot of warnings about this on recent udev upgrades. I tried substituting in some of the rules files but might have caused problems. Fact is that this was tested with the recent broken udev and problems were (also?) from udev itself. Should AT

Re: Udev ATTR instead of SYSFS

2009-12-07 Thread Jochen Schulz
Dave Witbrodt: > > The error message is a warning: it only affects the 'hplip' package, > and a bug report has already been filed I had a few rules using the old syntax as well, so it pays off to look closely what files udev complains about. I still have to test whether my rules still work, th

Re: Udev ATTR instead of SYSFS

2009-12-07 Thread Dave Witbrodt
David Baron wrote: Getting a lot of warnings about this on recent udev upgrades. I tried substituting in some of the rules files but might have caused problems. Fact is that this was tested with the recent broken udev and problems were (also?) from udev itself. Should ATTR be simply substitut

Udev ATTR instead of SYSFS

2009-12-07 Thread David Baron
Getting a lot of warnings about this on recent udev upgrades. I tried substituting in some of the rules files but might have caused problems. Fact is that this was tested with the recent broken udev and problems were (also?) from udev itself. Should ATTR be simply substituted for SYSFS? Should