Re: Thread-aware MUAs

2006-08-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Saturday 26 August 2006 00:29, Aaron Hall wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:16, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > > Paul Johnson wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:43, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > >> Aren't all *ix mail clients thread-aware? > >

Re: Thread-aware MUAs

2006-08-26 Thread Aaron Hall
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:16, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > Paul Johnson wrote: > > > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:43, Ron Johnson wrote: > > >> > > >> Aren't all *ix mail clients thread-aware? > > > > > > Pine isn't. > > > > after 4.5 it is :-) > > We

Re: Thread-aware MUAs

2006-08-25 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Friday 25 August 2006 03:27, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thursday 24 August 2006 21:37, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > But Paul, you're non-free. > > Sure, but I also work for a living, I provide a service to my > employer. Other people make goods. Yet others seem to think it's > acceptable to consider a

Re: Thread-aware MUAs

2006-08-25 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thursday 24 August 2006 21:37, Hal Vaughan wrote: > But Paul, you're non-free. Sure, but I also work for a living, I provide a service to my employer. Other people make goods. Yet others seem to think it's acceptable to consider an intangible and infinitely reproducible idea as property to

Re: Thread-aware MUAs

2006-08-24 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Thursday 24 August 2006 22:38, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thursday 24 August 2006 02:29, Ron Johnson wrote: > > Paul Johnson wrote: > > > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:16, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > >> Paul Johnson wrote: > > >>> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:43, Ron Johnson wrote: > > Danie

Re: Thread-aware MUAs

2006-08-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thursday 24 August 2006 02:29, Ron Johnson wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:16, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >> Paul Johnson wrote: > >>> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:43, Ron Johnson wrote: > Daniel Rose wrote: > [snip] > > > People who don't like o

Re: Thread-aware MUAs

2006-08-24 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Johnson wrote: > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:16, Miles Fidelman wrote: >> Paul Johnson wrote: >>> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:43, Ron Johnson wrote: Daniel Rose wrote: [snip] > People who don't like off-topic threads need

Re: Thread-aware MUAs

2006-08-23 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:16, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:43, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> Daniel Rose wrote: > >> [snip] > >> > >>> People who don't like off-topic threads need a thread-aware email > >>> reader, then the problem goes away > >

Re: Thread-aware MUAs

2006-08-23 Thread Miles Fidelman
Paul Johnson wrote: On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:43, Ron Johnson wrote: Daniel Rose wrote: [snip] People who don't like off-topic threads need a thread-aware email reader, then the problem goes away Aren't all *ix mail clients thread-aware? Pine isn't. after 4.5 it is :-) -- To U

Re: Thread-aware MUAs

2006-08-23 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:43, Ron Johnson wrote: > Daniel Rose wrote: > [snip] > > > People who don't like off-topic threads need a thread-aware email > > reader, then the problem goes away > > Aren't all *ix mail clients thread-aware? Pine isn't. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & G

Thread-aware MUAs

2006-08-23 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Rose wrote: [snip] > People who don't like off-topic threads need a thread-aware email > reader, then the problem goes away Aren't all *ix mail clients thread-aware? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is "common sense" really valid?