Re: The New Virtualizer on the Block (corrected package name)

2006-08-14 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
David Baron wrote: Now we have four. 1. Vmware: Proprietary. I installed their free version and could not complete bootup afterwards. Booted up knoppix and removed the vmware. Problem was with those ip numbers. I installed this and the previous beta's and have no problems running anything.

Re: The New Virtualizer on the Block

2006-08-13 Thread David Baron
On Sunday 13 August 2006 11:33, Derek wrote: > win4lin also > Yup. You pay for this one. I believe it is based on one of the others (qemu?) qemu is based on bochs good old dosemu is around as well the newer dosbox will let you mount and use real drives (dangerous?) > On 8/13/06, David Baron <[EMA

Re: The New Virtualizer on the Block

2006-08-13 Thread Derek
win4lin alsoOn 8/13/06, David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now we have four.1. Vmware: Proprietary. I installed their free version and could not completebootup afterwards. Booted up knoppix and removed the vmware. Problem was withthose ip numbers.2. Qemu: More of an emulater, very safe and very

The New Virtualizer on the Block (corrected package name)

2006-08-13 Thread David Baron
Now we have four. 1. Vmware: Proprietary. I installed their free version and could not complete bootup afterwards. Booted up knoppix and removed the vmware. Problem was with those ip numbers. 2. Qemu: More of an emulater, very safe and very easy. Requires a non-free ko to run acceptably. Knoppi

The New Virtualizer on the Block

2006-08-13 Thread David Baron
Now we have four. 1. Vmware: Proprietary. I installed their free version and could not complete bootup afterwards. Booted up knoppix and removed the vmware. Problem was with those ip numbers. 2. Qemu: More of an emulater, very safe and very easy. Requires a non-free ko to run acceptably. Knoppi