Re: The "CD signing key" (6294BE9B)

2011-03-08 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Lu, 07 mar 11, 21:09:14, Joel Rees wrote: > > I've also got to start getting around to the local conferences so I > can start working on the human networking thing. Debconf 11 will be held in Banja Luka, Bosnia-Herzegovina, closer to me than ever. If nothing unexpected comes up I'll try to be

Re: The "CD signing key" (6294BE9B)

2011-03-07 Thread Joel Rees
I swear, I'm losing it. Blame it on my age, but I really don't want to think I'm that old, yet. On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > [not snipping in case you want to put it back on the list] Yeah, I did intend to put this on the list, so I can find it again the next time I fo

Re: The "CD signing key" (6294BE9B)

2011-03-05 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sb, 05 mar 11, 23:47:38, Joel Rees wrote: > > I did go to the trouble of pulling the signatures and checksums off of > three different more-or-less randomly chosen mirrors, to check they > were the same, but I'd still feel a little more comfortable taking my > first spin with Debian if there we

Re: The "CD signing key" (6294BE9B)

2011-03-05 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 23:47:38 +0900, Joel Rees wrote: > I found three posts on this back in January, > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/01/msg01775.html > > but the documentation still says nothing about why the "CD signing key" > should be different from the archive key and why the CD

The "CD signing key" (6294BE9B)

2011-03-05 Thread Joel Rees
I found three posts on this back in January, http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/01/msg01775.html but the documentation still says nothing about why the "CD signing key" should be different from the archive key and why the CD signing key was never announced, etc. I did go to the trouble of