Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>songbird wrote:
...
>> ok, looks like the two versions are the same in
>> the first sector (netinst for i386 and amd64) so
>> the fix should work...
>
> The fix should apply to all Debian i386 and amd64 ISOs which were made
> with isohybrid functionality. The bug was introd
Hi,
i wrote:
> > (It would be embarrassing if a different Thomas was meant.)
songbird wrote:
> context is good... i dislike posting last names to usenet/mailing lists.
Well, germany is full of baby-boomer Thomases. :))
> > http://www.ludd.ltu.se/~ams/tmp/isohdpfx.bin.170324
> i hope the
Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> (It would be embarrassing if a different Thomas was meant.)
context is good... i dislike posting
last names to usenet/mailing lists.
> songbird wrote:
>> your recent efforts helped me get an
>> install going via USB stick on this ancient
>> machine (the bug with the
Hi,
(It would be embarrassing if a different Thomas was meant.)
songbird wrote:
> your recent efforts helped me get an
> install going via USB stick on this ancient
> machine (the bug with the cd image not being
> able to find isolinux.bin also was affecting
> the netinst i386 cd-image i had dow
your recent efforts helped me get an
install going via USB stick on this ancient
machine (the bug with the cd image not being
able to find isolinux.bin also was affecting
the netinst i386 cd-image i had downloaded).
the dd to copy the bytes as posted to the
bug (see cd-image bug list for thos
5 matches
Mail list logo