On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, Curt wrote:
> On 2022-01-20, Siard wrote:
> > Bob Bernstein wrote:
> > > Executing 'apt-cache search tesseract' brings up a multitude of
> > > packages.
> > >
> > > My need is simple enough, I think: I like to scan
On 2022-01-20, Siard wrote:
> Bob Bernstein wrote:
>> Executing 'apt-cache search tesseract' brings up a multitude of
>> packages.
>>
>> My need is simple enough, I think: I like to scan (using an
>> Epson scanner) pages of printed books -- almost on
Bob Bernstein wrote:
> Executing 'apt-cache search tesseract' brings up a multitude of
> packages.
>
> My need is simple enough, I think: I like to scan (using an
> Epson scanner) pages of printed books -- almost one hundred per
> cent text -- and then use OCR to pr
Executing 'apt-cache search tesseract' brings up a multitude of
packages.
My need is simple enough, I think: I like to scan (using an
Epson scanner) pages of printed books -- almost one hundred per
cent text -- and then use OCR to produce pages from which I can
copy 'n paste s
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> I scanned the document to ppm files, sent them to tesseract, put the
> output of tesseract into a .txt file, and cleaned up from there.
You could try gimagereader, a frontend for tesseract, making this
process somewhat easier. Among others, it uses a spell checker, so
Doug writes:
> On 08/25/2017 08:31 PM, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> How do I setup xsane to use the tesseract OCR engine?
> I see gocr under preferences->setup->ocr.
> Yours Sincerely
> Stephen Grant Brown.
>
> Unless it has been vastly imp
On 08/25/2017 08:31 PM, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
Hi All,
How do I setup xsane to use the tesseract OCR engine?
I see gocr under preferences->setup->ocr.
Yours Sincerely
Stephen Grant Brown.
Unless it has been vastly improved, you might as well copy the document
by hand! Finding and
Hi All,
How do I setup xsane to use the tesseract OCR engine?
I see gocr under preferences->setup->ocr.
Yours Sincerely
Stephen Grant Brown.
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:00:18 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
>>> Who needs old files when new arrive? :)
>
>>Well, it can be years of work that now cannot render with the new
>>version... you will get very angry birds (oops... sorry, I mean "users",
>>angry users) if you update the package to the last ve
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
>Did you try to compile tesseract for your Debian version? You can do
>that on the virtual machine, just to see how it goes :-?
OK, I'll give it a try.
>> Who needs old files when new arrive? :)
>Well, it can be years of
rectories of several repos
> like testing and stable, then all the packages are mixed - You do not
> know from the dir.s architecture which package belongs to which repo in
> the case.
Hum... not in Debian and many other distributions, look:
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t
esting, sid...
>I would not mix Ubuntu packages into a Debian installation. Have you
>considered in compiling the apckage from Tesseract site?
I thought to install Ubuntu in KVM and go on in case no luck w/
tesseract 3 in Debian.
>Ah, I've seen that you already posted into backport
El 2011-07-07 a las 13:50 -0700, sthu deus escribió:
(resending to the list)
> On 07/07/2011, Camaleón wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:02:40 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> >
> >> Here are:
> >>
> >> https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/tesseract
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:02:40 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Here are:
>
> https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/tesseract/+sourcepub/1729019/+listing-archive-extra
>
> plenty of missing in Debian 6 language packages w/ the updated program
> itself.
>
> Can't it be
Sthu Deus wrote:
Good time of the day.
Here are:
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/tesseract/+sourcepub/1729019/+listing-archive-extra
plenty of missing in Debian 6 language packages w/ the updated program
itself.
Can't it be easily backported to D6 ones it is in Ubuntu?
I
Good time of the day.
Here are:
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/tesseract/+sourcepub/1729019/+listing-archive-extra
plenty of missing in Debian 6 language packages w/ the updated program
itself.
Can't it be easily backported to D6 ones it is in Ubuntu?
I would like to do it m
Hugo Vanwoerkom schrieb:
Hi,
Recently there was a post mentioning tesseract.
Turns out that is an award winning opensource OCR that works!
Hugo
I use it with the gscan2pdf frontend and it works perfectly (at least
for documents in german language)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On 28 Dec 2008, andmalc wrote:
> On Dec 28, 5:10 am, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > On 21 Dec 2008, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >
> [snip]
>
> > Yes, tesseract does work well. Here, xsane gives depth 24, but conversion
> > to depth 8 is neither possible nor nec
On Dec 28, 5:10 am, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 21 Dec 2008, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
[snip]
> Yes, tesseract does work well. Here, xsane gives depth 24, but conversion
> to depth 8 is neither possible nor necessary. Following the docs, I did
There is an option at the top of the
On 21 Dec 2008, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently there was a post mentioning tesseract.
>
> Turns out that is an award winning opensource OCR that works!
>
> I tried it out:
>
> 1. apt-get install tesseract-ocr
> 2. apt-get install tesseract-ocr-eng
> 3
. 1200 DPI made things _worse_ not better,
> possibly because of noise. This was on Fedora, so maybe it was in fact
> tesseract.
Back when I first got access to the university scientific publication
network, I started to get hungry for an OCR tool to do bibliographies
and references,
, so maybe it was in fact
tesseract.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
ا-ب-ت-ث-ج-ح-خ-د-ذ-ر-ز-س-ش-ص-ض-ط-ظ-ع-غ-ف-ق-ك-ل-م-ن-ه-و-ي
А-Б-В-Г-Д-Е-Ё-Ж-З-И-Й-К-Л-М-Н-О-П-Р-С-Т-У-Ф-Х-Ц-Ч-Ш-Щ-Ъ-Ы-Ь-Э-Ю-Я
а-б-в-г-д-е-ё-ж-з-и-
Hi,
Recently there was a post mentioning tesseract.
Turns out that is an award winning opensource OCR that works!
I tried it out:
1. apt-get install tesseract-ocr
2. apt-get install tesseract-ocr-eng
3. use xsane to scan a page at dpi 300 and save as .tif
4. run: convert foo.tif -depth 8 foo1
23 matches
Mail list logo
