Re: Tasksel is not what it was....

2004-08-01 Thread Keith O'Connell
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:31:16 -0400 Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Keith O'Connell wrote: > > Where can I find out what files comprised; > > > > lsb > > The lsb package. > > > unix server > > Too ill-defined to really be useful, but FWIW, it comprised these >

Re: Tasksel is not what it was....

2004-08-01 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 08:04:48PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:22:54 +0100, Keith O'Connell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What a strange answer that was. I really don't care how tasksel > > works. I have no idea if a bug exists. I was asking if the lists > > that used t

Re: Tasksel is not what it was....

2004-08-01 Thread Joey Hess
Keith O'Connell wrote: > Where can I find out what files comprised; > > lsb The lsb package. > unix server Too ill-defined to really be useful, but FWIW, it comprised these packages: ssh telnetd talk talkd ytalk finger fingerd ftpd zsh tcsh pdksh s

Re: Tasksel is not what it was....

2004-08-01 Thread Jon Dowland
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:22:54 +0100, Keith O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What a strange answer that was. I really don't care how tasksel works. I have no > idea if a bug exists. I was asking if the lists that used to make up the tasksel > groups exist as lists anywhere. > > I'm sure you

Re: Tasksel is not what it was....

2004-08-01 Thread Keith O'Connell
John, On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 09:13:04 +0800 John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you don't like the way tasksel works, file a bug report with > reportbug. It's not difficult, and one of the better ways to get > problems fixed. What a strange answer that was. I really don't care how t

Re: Tasksel is not what it was....

2004-07-31 Thread John Summerfield
Keith O'Connell wrote: Hi, I am running testing and last week I wiped down a machine and started again. I normally use some of the tasksel groups to save time in picking files I will want. I now find that since the last time I used it it has changed drastically.

Re: Tasksel is not what it was.... SOT question

2004-07-31 Thread John Summerfield
Paul E Condon wrote: On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 10:36:15PM +0100, Keith O'Connell wrote: Hi, I am running testing and last week I wiped down a machine and started again. I normally use some of the tasksel groups to save time in picking files I will want. I now find that sinc

Re: Tasksel is not what it was.... SOT question

2004-07-31 Thread Paul E Condon
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 10:36:15PM +0100, Keith O'Connell wrote: > Hi, > > I am running testing and last week I wiped down a machine and > started again. I normally use some of the tasksel groups to > save time in picking files I will want. I now find that since > the last

Tasksel is not what it was....

2004-07-31 Thread Keith O'Connell
Hi, I am running testing and last week I wiped down a machine and started again. I normally use some of the tasksel groups to save time in picking files I will want. I now find that since the last time I used it it has changed drastically. There are less gr