Hellow Debian hackers,
Today i did upgrade Debian with successfuly: from 11 to 12.
All things are good. No error No failure!
Thanks again!
soyeomul@yw-1130:~$ uname -srm
Linux 6.1.0-9-amd64 x86_64
soyeomul@yw-1130:~$ lsb_release -d
No LSB modules are available.
Description:Debian GNU
Thanks to David Wright and Greg Wooledge for their replies.
Thanks also to David for the reference to the article on Margaret Thatcher --
I'm trying to obtain a copy through my local library (ILL).
On Wednesday, December 07, 2022 11:53:18 AM David Wright wrote:
...
> Margaret Thatc
On 7/11/21 9:18 PM, Gunnar Gervin wrote:
>
> How repaired hdd in old osx 8.6 mac i386.
> A live usb with debian 10.9 buster did it asked to change from Bios boot
> to Uefi boot & reinstalled hdd. Laptop works. So now can put distro in
> usb, & try which debian based distro works best on Mac osx 10
How repaired hdd in old osx 8.6 mac i386.
A live usb with debian 10.9 buster did it asked to change from Bios boot to
Uefi boot & reinstalled hdd. Laptop works. So now can put distro in usb, &
try which debian based distro works best on Mac osx 10.13.6. MX, PsychOS,
Manjaro, Debian?
I liked the sof
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 08:46:18AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> "remind" is the appropriate tool.
> It does NOT rely on anything other than computer being turned on.
> With appropriate script it can "nag" me ;}
> q.v.
> https://manpages.debian.org/buster/remind/remind.1.en.html
> https://dianne
"remind" is the appropriate tool.
It does NOT rely on anything other than computer being turned on.
With appropriate script it can "nag" me ;}
q.v.
https://manpages.debian.org/buster/remind/remind.1.en.html
https://dianne.skoll.ca/projects/remind/
On 08/15/2020 06:30 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
J
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 07:52:23 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 04/18/2020 05:19 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I can see any *ONE* previous commands by using the up-arrow key.
> > But I need to see the *complete* history. F1 is no "Help".
> > Obviously its stored in a file. Where?
> > TIA
>
> U
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 06:52:23AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
> There's one thing I don't understand - erasure of previous history.
> https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/088 states it as:
> >... it overwrites the existing history with the new version.
That's because it reads the history
On 04/18/2020 05:19 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
I can see any *ONE* previous commands by using the up-arrow key.
But I need to see the *complete* history. F1 is no "Help".
Obviously its stored in a file. Where?
TIA
Using 'cat ~/.bash_history' gives desired format (i.e. without the line
numbers
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 01:36:52PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> On 7/2/19 11:20 AM, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 06:30:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >> I tend to stick to Debian packages as my primary choice, resorting
> >> to off-distribution packages when needed
I had just bought a new camera, a cannon with more capable glass than my
now elderly nikon with its very flaky usb socket. Wheezy was never
aware the camera was even plugged in, but I'd just installed a modified
stretch the linuxcnc folks are testing to a test machine, so I took it
to that mac
I will summarize them all up.
Thanks
On Tue 12 Mar 2019 at 19:20:34 -0400, deb wrote:
> Fortunately Brian has blocked me,
Eh? You'll have to explain.
--
Brian.
On 3/11/19 5:08 PM, Mart van de Wege wrote:
And yeah, Debian is an upstream distribution, so you will have a lot of
people who are being overly purist about Linux solutions, because they
have the luxury of working in homogenous environments. Unfortunately a
lot of them are lousy communicators.
Thank you.
On 2/13/2019 9:11 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
deb wrote:
On 2/13/2019 8:46 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:41:33AM -0500, deb wrote:
#1 Given that it's not great to pound the same area of a SSD with
writes; is it indeed still best practice to go with a swap partition
Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>songbird wrote:
...
>> ok, looks like the two versions are the same in
>> the first sector (netinst for i386 and amd64) so
>> the fix should work...
>
> The fix should apply to all Debian i386 and amd64 ISOs which were made
> with isohybrid functionality. The bug was introd
Hi,
i wrote:
> > (It would be embarrassing if a different Thomas was meant.)
songbird wrote:
> context is good... i dislike posting last names to usenet/mailing lists.
Well, germany is full of baby-boomer Thomases. :))
> > http://www.ludd.ltu.se/~ams/tmp/isohdpfx.bin.170324
> i hope the
achine (the bug with the cd image not being
>> able to find isolinux.bin also was affecting
>> the netinst i386 cd-image i had downloaded).
>
> I assume you mean
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857597
>
> In this case i have to share the thanks
cd-image i had downloaded).
I assume you mean
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857597
In this case i have to share the thanks with David Christensen, who
reported the bug and bravely tested, and Martin Str|mberg, who produced
the fixed code.
> the dd to copy the bytes as p
your recent efforts helped me get an
install going via USB stick on this ancient
machine (the bug with the cd image not being
able to find isolinux.bin also was affecting
the netinst i386 cd-image i had downloaded).
the dd to copy the bytes as posted to the
bug (see cd-image bug list for thos
On 10/8/2016 12:36 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Richard Owlett composed on 2016-10-08 10:47 (UTC-0500):
...today, while chasing down an intermittent problem, I
needed to know which point release was active...
cat /etc/debian_version
I never had need of "cat" before.
Exploring /etc was educational
who runs steam. Can you please tell me tye anser that way I can make a
> aurgument up against my dad? I really do want to use steam and alot of my
> friends use it too. Thanks!
Steam is made by Valve Software.
You might want to tell your Dad that Debian has a steam package.
https://packages.debian.org/stretch/steam
pgpWZ32jhp6OP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
w who makes the game
and who runs steam. Can you please tell me tye anser that way I can make a
aurgument up against my dad? I really do want to use steam and alot of my
friends use it too. Thanks!
ally used cd.
After a few selections were deleted to reduce the play list to 39 minutes
Brasero burnt the cd with no problems.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/21/2015 10:55 AM, Thomas H. George wrote:
[...]
>> Thanks I just tested Shift-Forward and it worked like a charm.
>> With this problem solved Icedove works perfectly for me.
Great! Nice to hear.
Regards,
Ralph
-BEGIN P
On 06/12/2015 03:34 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 06/12/2015 at 02:58 PM, Thomas H. George wrote:
Using Iceweasel I continually get a popup saying Flash Player needed
to display some content. In fact, all the content seems to be
displayed so the popup is only a minor annoyance.
BUT then a friend
Quoting Chris Bannister (cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz):
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 09:49:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote (and corrected
> himself):
> > This conversation made me revisit my own prompt which I have now
> > modified. I thought I'd share it with you in case any part of it
> > should be h
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 09:49:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Thomas H. George (li...@tomgeorge.info):
> > >
> > Your explanation is very helpful, converts the jumble I copied from a
> > website into a logical sequence of instructions. I really appreciate
> > being able to understand the
Quoting David Wright (deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk):
> export PROMPT_COMMAND+=" || echo -ne '\e]0;${HOSTNAME^^}
> $(tty) ${HOSTNAME^^}\a'"
Forgive the typo; that || was in the penultimate version that I
accidentally included. It should of course be ; otherwise the
title only
Quoting Thomas H. George (li...@tomgeorge.info):
> >
> Your explanation is very helpful, converts the jumble I copied from a
> website into a logical sequence of instructions. I really appreciate
> being able to understand the meaning of the prompt.
This conversation made me revisit my own prompt
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:31:15PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Thomas H. George (li...@tomgeorge.info):
> > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:54:40AM +, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > I entered the following in .bashrc
> > > >
> > > >PS1='\033[01;33m\h:\w\$ \033[00m'
I'll give it a try.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150306130524.ga6...@fok02.laje.edewe.de
Just a note of thanks to Joel, Andrei and Florent. :) I'll carry my
situation to the Audio users list and see what happens. Thanks for the
time and the courteous comments.
--hobie
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:56:12AM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>> > On Jo, 27 nov
On Friday 26 September 2014 16:53:56 Doug wrote:
> On 09/26/2014 09:13 AM, Rajavel wrote:
> I wouldn't listen to that garbage if it was the only radio station in the
> world!
Must you reply to spam. :-( It makes life harder for the filters.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ..
On 09/26/2014 09:13 AM, Rajavel wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for your mail. Please keep on listening to Love Guru, only on Radio
> City 91.1FM, Monday to Saturday - 9pm to 1am. You can listen to Love Guru,
> from any part of the world through, Radio City Tamil web radio. The link is
Thanks for your mail. Please keep on listening to Love Guru, only on Radio City
91.1FM, Monday to Saturday - 9pm to 1am. You can listen to Love Guru, from any
part of the world through, Radio City Tamil web radio. The link is available in
www.planetradiocity.com.
Love the Love...
with loads
On Saturday 14 June 2014 11:57:59 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 13 June 2014 22:02:06 Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Just to plug a good tool I like using pwgen to generate truly random
> > passwords. A long random password is sufficiently difficult to
> > exploit. If you are using passwords that are easy
On Sunday 26 January 2014 14:26:18 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> I am wanting to use the CLI to copy some files from dirA to dirB.
> I want to exclude all hidden files. Will this command achieve it?
> :--
>
> cp -Rp /path/to/sourcedir/A/* /path/to/destinationdir/B
I have been away from my computer for a w
Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18:
>>>>> Not using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'.
>>
>>> It sounds like you're lacking a GTK3 theme engine. For example, I have
>>> the clearlooks-phenix-theme package installed so that GTK3
using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'.
>
>> It sounds like you're lacking a GTK3 theme engine. For example, I have
>> the clearlooks-phenix-theme package installed so that GTK3 and GTK2 apps
>> look nearly identical.
>
> Thanks. Adwaita's not too bad
K3 theme engine. For example, I have
> the clearlooks-phenix-theme package installed so that GTK3 and GTK2 apps
> look nearly identical.
Thanks. Adwaita's not too bad either. A theme is another thing I'd
like to create one day - cross-desktop, cross-display engine,
highly-customizable
* On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error:
> >
> > (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18:
> > Not using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'.
> >
> > Evince error:
> >
> > (evince:15620): Gtk
> Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error:
>
> (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18:
> Not using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'.
>
> Evince error:
>
> (evince:15620): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18:
> Not using units i
On 9/5/13, Kailash wrote:
> On Sunday 01 September 2013 08:24 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
>>>
>>> Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have
>>> been happy since.
>>
On Sunday 01 September 2013 08:24 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>>> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
>>
>> Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have
>> been happy since.
>
> I find it adequate; ~8months now
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 19:47:54 +0200, Conrad Nelson wrote:
On 09/03/2013 03:08 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 11:24 -0500, Conrad Nelson wrote:
What's wrong with MATE?
It could cause conflicts with packages from official repositories.
Could, could, could. So what? I've seen c
On 09/03/2013 03:08 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 11:24 -0500, Conrad Nelson wrote:
What's wrong with MATE?
It could cause conflicts with packages from official repositories.
Could, could, could. So what? I've seen conflicts of the same nature in
the official repositories. A
Am 01.09.2013 08:22, schrieb Joel Rees:
> 've been looking at geany, and it looks interesting functionally, but
> I'm not at all sold on it. Don't like lots of tool panes all over.
> It's part of the reason I can't quite bring myself to use either
> netbeans or eclipse regularly.
Most of them can
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 11:24 -0500, Conrad Nelson wrote:
> What's wrong with MATE?
It could cause conflicts with packages from official repositories.
> Xfce hasn't done anything interesting in years, and I've seen
> big bugs in Xfce that still need fixing that are even more glaring than
> most o
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 11:43 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> Hmm. I think I have seen that kind of thing once, some years ago, but
> not recently. I think it was with a less stable version of LXDE
> (running a Fedora security tools live USB).
I've seen it before too, but don't remember the reason for thi
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:32 -0400, Ralph Katz wrote:
> On 08/31/2013 10:21 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> > "Thod Motte" writes:
> >
> >> Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and unstable
> >> as Windows 95 was in 1997 and less
>
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 02:02 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> http://upmart.org/gedit-menus-example.jpg
That's really odd :(. When using gedit on Xfce (different distros,
including Ubuntu/Debian) it's ok on my machine. I agree there seems to
be some lib(s) missing. Xfce was and for some installs sti
On 09/02/2013 03:38 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 02 September 2013 17:24:56 Conrad Nelson wrote:
I used to actually be a big KDE user. I still like it but I've found
it's gone from being one of the fastest, but still flexible desktop
environments around to being one of the absolute slowest.
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 02 September 2013 17:24:56 Conrad Nelson wrote:
I used to actually be a big KDE user. I still like it but I've found
it's gone from being one of the fastest, but still flexible desktop
environments around to being one of the absolute slowest.
The fast, flexible envir
On Monday 02 September 2013 17:24:56 Conrad Nelson wrote:
> I used to actually be a big KDE user. I still like it but I've found
> it's gone from being one of the fastest, but still flexible desktop
> environments around to being one of the absolute slowest.
The fast, flexible environment is still
On 08/31/2013 06:07 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 07:01 -0400, Thod Motte wrote:
Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and
unstable as Windows 95 was in 1997 and less customizable.
I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
ce between the drop down menu titles in
>>>> the menu bar of GNOME apps, such as gedit and evolution.
>>>
>>> I only ever installed xfce, not gnome. Manually installed gedit. I'm
>>> guessing there's some libs to isntall...
>>
>> Manually,
and evolution.
>>
>> I only ever installed xfce, not gnome. Manually installed gedit. I'm
>> guessing there's some libs to isntall...
>
> Manually, as in ...?
:) Thanks, even apt and aptitude have differences which can be relevant.
> Or as in using "apt
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/1/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu
>>> bar of gedit (and I've seen it elsewhere I think), all the menus are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2013 10:21 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> "Thod Motte" writes:
>
>> Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and unstable as
>> Windows 95 was in 1997 and less
>> customizable.
>>
>
On 9/1/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu
>> bar of gedit (and I've seen it elsewhere I think), all the menus are
>> jammed up against each other - no nice spacing between the
On 09/01/2013 02:22 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
...
>
> I've been looking at geany, and it looks interesting functionally, but
> I'm not at all sold on it. Don't like lots of tool panes all over.
> It's part of the reason I can't quite bring myself to use either
> netbeans or eclipse regularly.
>
...
A
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 02:15 -0700, Weaver wrote:
> On Sat, August 31, 2013 11:19 pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > There are a lot of other good (and also lots of bad) DEs, but Xfce4 is
> > the DE that is most similar to GNOME2 + stable + in official
> > repositories of Debian and many other distros. I s
On Sat, August 31, 2013 11:19 pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> There are a lot of other good (and also lots of bad) DEs, but Xfce4 is
> the DE that is most similar to GNOME2 + stable + in official
> repositories of Debian and many other distros. I suspect the OP wants
> GNOME2, so recommending KDE (a goo
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 12:54:07 +1000
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> >> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
> >
> > Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have
> > been happy since.
>
> I find it adequate; ~8months n
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>>> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
>>
>> Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have
>> been happy since.
>
> I find it adequate; ~8months now; I a
There are a lot of other good (and also lots of bad) DEs, but Xfce4 is
the DE that is most similar to GNOME2 + stable + in official
repositories of Debian and many other distros. I suspect the OP wants
GNOME2, so recommending KDE (a good DE) or recommending Fluxbox and LXDE
(good DEs too) isn't goo
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu
> bar of gedit (and I've seen it elsewhere I think), all the menus are
> jammed up against each other - no nice spacing between them. Anyone
> know what I ought to inst
On Sat, August 31, 2013 8:14 pm, taz man wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Joe Pfeiffer
>> Sent: 09/01/13 02:21 AM
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> Subject: Re: Thanks
>>
>> "Thod Motte" writes:
>>
>> &
> - Original Message -
> From: Joe Pfeiffer
> Sent: 09/01/13 02:21 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Thanks
>
> "Thod Motte" writes:
>
> > Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and unstable as
> > Wi
On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
>
> Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have
> been happy since.
I find it adequate; ~8months now; I am however reasonable with the command line.
I don't like mousepad
"Thod Motte" writes:
> Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and unstable as
> Windows 95 was in 1997 and less
> customizable.
>
> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
Another vote for xfce. I switched to it qu
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 07:01:42 -0400
"Thod Motte" wrote:
> Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and
> unstable as Windows 95 was in 1997 and less customizable.
>
> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
Instead of shoo
> Xfce isn't GNOME 2, but it's ok.
Yeah! XFCE is great. Tried it, too, on my netbook. It is fast and well usable.
I also was very pleased with LXDE, which is also very lightweight and highly
usable. In fact, I still could not find a decision, which one is better or
faster. So I did the bst thin
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 07:01 -0400, Thod Motte wrote:
> Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and
> unstable as Windows 95 was in 1997 and less customizable.
>
> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
Don't! Install Xfce, IM
Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and unstable as
Windows 95 was in 1997 and less customizable.
I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
On 01 May 2013, staticsafe wrote:
> On 5/1/2013 3:27, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> >
>
> If you need any help, feel free to subscribe to freebsd-questions[0].
>
> [0] - http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>
Yes, thanks - already done that. I'
On Wed, 1 May 2013 09:40:28 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
Hello Chris,
>I think the point is that it has nothing to do with age.
Ah, I see.
Obviously, I'm not as wise as I am old. :-)
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately a
On 5/1/2013 3:27, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 01 May 2013, Chris Bannister wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:14:00PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:36 -0500 Hugo Vanwoerkom
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Hugo,
>>>
mine neither
>>>
>>> Are you saying that you don't take
On 01 May 2013, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:14:00PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:36 -0500 Hugo Vanwoerkom
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello Hugo,
> >
> > >mine neither
> >
> > Are you saying that you don't take into consideration a company's or
> > deve
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:14:00PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:36 -0500
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> Hello Hugo,
>
> >mine neither
>
> Are you saying that you don't take into consideration a company's or
> developer's morality (insofar as it's possible to know their mo
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:36 -0500
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hello Hugo,
>mine neither
Are you saying that you don't take into consideration a company's or
developer's morality (insofar as it's possible to know their moral
stance) when choosing a product/app/whatever?
--
Regards _
/ )
John Hasler wrote:
Siard writes:
AFAIK, in general, the older one gets, the less important technical
aspects become w.r.t. the choices one makes, and the more important
the extent gets to which one can identify himself with the makers/
manufacturers/developers.
That has not been my experience.
John Hasler writes:
> Siard writes:
> > AFAIK, in general, the older one gets, the less important technical
> > aspects become w.r.t. the choices one makes, and the more important
> > the extent gets to which one can identify himself with the makers/
> > manufacturers/developers.
>
> That has not
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:47:01 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
Hello Patrick,
>I installed Claws-Mail and only the "Fancy" plugin. It works, sort
>of: Format HTML correctly, but doesn't show images. Config problem?
>Don't know. Yet.
Yes. Even if the "Load images" option is set to yes, there are
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:36:53 +0200
Siard wrote:
Hello Siard,
>AFAIK, in general, the older one gets, the less important technical
>aspects become w.r.t. the choices one makes, and the more important
>the extent gets to which one can identify himself with the makers/
>manufacturers/developers.
W
ctly how they will work in the
reader.
> I also use the tray icon plugin so I can minimize claws to the system
> tray and see when new mail arrives.
I don't have either Claws or Slypheed set to check for mail
automatically. I do it manually 2 or 3 times a day. Prefer it that way.
Thanks for the info.
B
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130429192330.2da74...@debian7.boseck208.net
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:47:01 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:21:54 +0100
> Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:07:01 -0700
> > Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > Hello Patrick,
> >
> > >Sylpheed accepts plugins, too. To what extent I don't know.
> > >Haven't gott
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:08:16 -0400
Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 04/29/2013 10:10 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:41:50 -0400
> > Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/28/2013 09:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> >>> [snip]
> >>> I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:21:54 +0100
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:07:01 -0700
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Hello Patrick,
>
> >Sylpheed accepts plugins, too. To what extent I don't know.
> >Haven't gotten that far in the manual. Since Claws is a fork, maybe,
> >they are similar.
Siard writes:
> AFAIK, in general, the older one gets, the less important technical
> aspects become w.r.t. the choices one makes, and the more important
> the extent gets to which one can identify himself with the makers/
> manufacturers/developers.
That has not been my experience.
--
John Hasle
Brad Rogers:
> Siard:
> > But that horrible logo just about put the lid on it. It was a
> > picture of a bird's claw. Then I realized: I'm not of their kind.
> > Back to Sylpheed!
>
> Each to their own, of course. I don't care about logos, etc. If the
> program does what I want, then it's fine
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:41:17 +0200
Siard wrote:
Hello Siard,
>Using Sylpheed, I once tried Claws. For messages marked with a color
>in Sylpheed, the colors got lost. It had a couple of extra bells and
IDK why that happened. I never used colouring in Sylpheed, so can't
even hazard guess for t
Brad Rogers:
> Patrick Bartek:
> > Sylpheed accepts plugins, too. To what extent I don't know.
> > Haven't gotten that far in the manual. Since Claws is a fork,
> > maybe, they are similar.
>
> Look 'n' feel is similar, but one of the reasons for the split was the
> ever increasing difficulty of
On 04/29/2013 10:10 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:41:50 -0400
Frank McCormick wrote:
On 04/28/2013 09:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
[snip]
I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader window itself,
instead of me having to switch to a different workspace where
google-chr
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:07:01 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
Hello Patrick,
>Sylpheed accepts plugins, too. To what extent I don't know.
>Haven't gotten that far in the manual. Since Claws is a fork, maybe,
>they are similar.
Look 'n' feel is similar, but one of the reasons for the split was the
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:41:50 -0400
Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 04/28/2013 09:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > [snip]
> > I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader window itself,
> > instead of me having to switch to a different workspace where
> > google-chrome is running all the time. Wou
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:45:46 +0100
Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:36:06 +0200, Siard
> > wrote:
> >
> [cut]
> >
> > google-chrome '%s' works. Don't forget the hyphen.
> >
> > I just wish it could open in Sylphe
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:36:06 +0200, Siard
> wrote:
>
[cut]
>
> google-chrome '%s' works. Don't forget the hyphen.
>
> I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader window itself, instead
> of me having to switch to a different
Lisi Reisz:
> Siard:
> > Check whether you can open chrome + url from the command line like
> > this: $ chrome www.google.com
> > If this works, then chrome '%s' should work with the 'Open' menu
> > option mentioned above.
>
> I type (without the < and >) in the launcher to get
> Crome opened.
1 - 100 of 836 matches
Mail list logo
