On 2009-09-06 19:30:40 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> The upgrade from sid finds it unsafe to change to dependency based
> boot and leaves it unconfigured with a couple of missing .rc files.
Unconfigured? This is probably the following bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545261
Am 07.09.2009 15:04, schrieb David Baron:
> 2. It may be a while before many debianers will in fact migrate. Some may
> never do so. Sysv-rc is uninstallable if the safety-check comes up with
> "errors". Since, once these errors are fixed and one rally wants to go over,
> one must run dpkg-reco
On Monday 07 September 2009 03:08:49 debian-user-digest-
requ...@lists.debian.org wrote:
> > Purging bittorrent and the othes leaves me with obsolete init.d scripts
> > from jackd and timidity. I want these packages but not necessarily the
> > init.d scripts to start them. (In fact, Timidity now h
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 06 2009, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Hint: your mails are easier to read if you put a blank line between
> citations and your reply.
> On 2009-09-06 21:47 +0200, David Baron wrote:
>> On Sunday 06 September 2009 21:23:10 debian-user-digest-
>> requ...@lists.debian.org wrote:
>>> > The
David Baron wrote:
> Purging bittorrent and the othes leaves me with obsolete init.d scripts from
> jackd and timidity. I want these packages but not necessarily the init.d
> scripts to start them. (In fact, Timidity now has a separate daemon package.)
> So how do I fix this.
The correct way t
Hint: your mails are easier to read if you put a blank line between
citations and your reply.
On 2009-09-06 21:47 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> On Sunday 06 September 2009 21:23:10 debian-user-digest-
> requ...@lists.debian.org wrote:
>> > The upgrade from sid finds it unsafe to change to dependenc
On Sunday 06 September 2009 21:23:10 debian-user-digest-
requ...@lists.debian.org wrote:
> > The upgrade from sid finds it unsafe to change to dependency based boot
> > and leaves it unconfigured with a couple of missing .rc files.
>
> What are .rc files?
Reinstalling over testing did not flag th
On 2009-09-06 18:30 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> The upgrade from sid finds it unsafe to change to dependency based boot and
> leaves it unconfigured with a couple of missing .rc files.
What are .rc files?
> 1. Is the system bootable at this point?
I think yes, you will get the same boot order
The upgrade from sid finds it unsafe to change to dependency based boot and
leaves it unconfigured with a couple of missing .rc files.
1. Is the system bootable at this point?
2. Downgrade this to testing? I did that but can always re-upgrade.
3. Leaving the co-version sysvinit-utils for now unti
9 matches
Mail list logo
