On 7/1/2013 11:07 AM, André Nunes Batista wrote:
> I enjoyed very much to read your previous post, but here I'll have to
> disagree.
>
> Debian aims to be a universal operating system, but this is to some
> point contradictory with the pace of computer architecture innovation,
> which is not at al
I enjoyed very much to read your previous post, but here I'll have to
disagree.
Debian aims to be a universal operating system, but this is to some
point contradictory with the pace of computer architecture innovation,
which is not at all controlled by free software community, but self
imposed as
200 browser tabs /and/ a gmail account. That figures ...
On 06/30/2013 04:22 PM, Kelly Clowers wrote:
Can't speak for him of course, but my SeaMonkey is currently using
4.2 GB RES and 5.3 GB VIRT (probably north of 200 tabs)
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 6/28/2013 2:49 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>> For now I will run regular 32-bit Sid..realizing I am wasting
>> the opportunity to utilize more memory and perhaps faster operations.
>
> Your 32 bit PAE Sid kernel can address 64GB. Since
On 29/06/13 07:00 PM, Doug wrote:
On 06/29/2013 06:38 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/29/2013 02:05 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 6/28/2013 2:49 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
For now I will run regular 32-bit Sid..realizing I am wasting
the opportunity to utilize more memory and perhaps faster op
On 6/29/2013 6:00 PM, Doug wrote:
> So why have we been
> bamboozled into running 64 bits if there is no advantage?
There are many reasons. One is priming the pump. At some point in the
future applications are predicted to become so content rich (bloated)
that individual application processes w
On 06/29/2013 06:38 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 06/29/2013 02:05 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 6/28/2013 2:49 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
>>
>>> For now I will run regular 32-bit Sid..realizing I am wasting
>>> the opportunity to utilize more memory and perhaps faster operations.
>>
>> Your 32
On 06/29/2013 02:05 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 6/28/2013 2:49 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
For now I will run regular 32-bit Sid..realizing I am wasting
the opportunity to utilize more memory and perhaps faster operations.
Your 32 bit PAE Sid kernel can address 64GB. Since your new machine
wi
On 6/28/2013 2:49 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
> For now I will run regular 32-bit Sid..realizing I am wasting
> the opportunity to utilize more memory and perhaps faster operations.
Your 32 bit PAE Sid kernel can address 64GB. Since your new machine
will have less than 64GB RAM you're wasting no
it be switching
my installation over ? I know there are some problems with Flash but
what about the kernel and so forth- I am not a newby but this is the
first time I've considered a a major change.
You don't have to change anything. 32 bit Sid will run just fine on an
x86-64 CPU. Switc
On Friday 28 June 2013 21:58:29 Slavko wrote:
> I don't know, what you have in your $HOME, but i simple copied whole my
> $HOME from old i386 system - scripts was worked and data was accessible
> (at least i don't remember any problems).
+1
I was nervous and stuck to what worked for a bit, even o
hassle will it be switching
>>> my installation over ? I know there are some problems with Flash but
>>> what about the kernel and so forth- I am not a newby but this is the
>>> first time I've considered a a major change.
>>
>> You don't have to change an
know there are some problems with Flash but
what about the kernel and so forth- I am not a newby but this is the
first time I've considered a a major change.
You don't have to change anything. 32 bit Sid will run just fine on an
x86-64 CPU. Switching to 64 bit software is a cho
what about the kernel and so forth- I am not a newby but this is the
first time I've considered a a major change.
You don't have to change anything. 32 bit Sid will run just fine on an
x86-64 CPU. Switching to 64 bit software is a choice, not a requirement.
Well , that was quite
On 28/06/13 01:30 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Frank McCormick wrote:
I am running 32 bit Sid and am thinking about a new computer which
has a 64 bit Intel CPU. How much of a hassle will it be switching
my installation over ? I know there are some problems with Flash but
what
22CF80
I challenge you to play the game in which there is no loser but
everything is fun and worthwhile!
--- Begin Message ---
On 6/27/2013 10:12 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 27/06/13 10:56 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> You don't have to change anything. 32 bit Sid will run just fine on a
Am 28.06.2013 um 06:15 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 6/27/2013 10:12 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
32bit systems have memory limitations that you don't
encounter with 64bit.
There are two such limitations when using a PAE kernel and 32bit user
space on x86-64, which are the same limitations on P6 class
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Frank McCormick wrote:
> I am running 32 bit Sid and am thinking about a new computer which
> has a 64 bit Intel CPU. How much of a hassle will it be switching
> my installation over ? I know there are some problems with Flash but
> what about the kernel and so forth- I am not
tification,
neither that there are server issues (postmaster), nor hat I'm banned
(listmaster).
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Switching to 64 bit
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 04:30:12 +0200
The short answer:
Backup your curr
o change anything. 32 bit Sid will run just fine on an
> >> x86-64 CPU. Switching to 64 bit software is a choice, not a requirement.
>
> > Not really.
>
> Yes, really. This is fact. Don't disagree with facts Gary, especially
> when I am the one stating t
On 6/27/2013 10:12 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 27/06/13 10:56 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> You don't have to change anything. 32 bit Sid will run just fine on an
>> x86-64 CPU. Switching to 64 bit software is a choice, not a requirement.
> Not really.
Yes, really. This i
> You don't have to change anything. 32 bit Sid will run just fine on an
> x86-64 CPU. Switching to 64 bit software is a choice, not a requirement.
>
> --
> Stan
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
about the kernel and so forth- I am not a newby but this is the
first time I've considered a a major change.
You don't have to change anything. 32 bit Sid will run just fine on an
x86-64 CPU. Switching to 64 bit software is a choice, not a requirement.
Not really. 32bit systems h
forth- I am not a newby but this is the
> first time I've considered a a major change.
You don't have to change anything. 32 bit Sid will run just fine on an
x86-64 CPU. Switching to 64 bit software is a choice, not a requirement.
--
Stan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
Honestly, there's not really any major issue with Flash on 64-bit unless
you use nspluginwrapper. Use native 64-bit flash.
Debian's multilib is a lot better, so the only issue is maybe in support
for software only "available" in 32-bit.
Conrad
On Jun 27, 2013 7:12 PM, "Frank McCormick" wrote:
>
I am running 32 bit Sid and am thinking about a new computer which
has a 64 bit Intel CPU. How much of a hassle will it be switching
my installation over ? I know there are some problems with Flash but
what about the kernel and so forth- I am not a newby but this is the
first time I've considered
26 matches
Mail list logo
