On Wed Apr 24, 2024 at 1:50 PM BST, Richard wrote:
> upon gathering my thoughts for answering to you I found the solution to
> this: update-initramfs can't handle the case that crypttab ends in the line
> of the last entry and not in a new line character. I think there either
> should be a fix for
On 26/04/2024 12:56, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 26 Apr 2024 at 11:27:24 (+0900), John Crawley wrote:
Innocent question: what difference does the comment make vs just ending the
file with an empty line?
Nothing for the computer, but visibility for me.
Say you print the file on paper. All you
On 26/04/2024 10:56, David Wright wrote:
Editor examples: a windowed emacs buffer has a ≣ decoration at the
extreme left edge after the last line of text, so that you can
distinguish an absence of lines from empty lines.
Perhaps that decoration should be explicitly enabled. However it
reminded
On Fri 26 Apr 2024 at 11:27:24 (+0900), John Crawley wrote:
> On 24/04/2024 22:37, David Wright wrote:
> > On Wed 24 Apr 2024 at 14:50:36 (+0200), Richard wrote:
> > > upon gathering my thoughts for answering to you I found the solution to
> > > this: update-initramfs can't handle the case that cry
On 24/04/2024 22:37, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 24 Apr 2024 at 14:50:36 (+0200), Richard wrote:
upon gathering my thoughts for answering to you I found the solution to
this: update-initramfs can't handle the case that crypttab ends in the line
of the last entry and not in a new line character. I
On Wed 24 Apr 2024 at 14:50:36 (+0200), Richard wrote:
> upon gathering my thoughts for answering to you I found the solution to
> this: update-initramfs can't handle the case that crypttab ends in the line
> of the last entry and not in a new line character. I think there either
> should be a fix
Hi Michel,
upon gathering my thoughts for answering to you I found the solution to
this: update-initramfs can't handle the case that crypttab ends in the line
of the last entry and not in a new line character. I think there either
should be a fix for this or at least a way to handle this case with
Hello Hans,
this is exactly what I did. To be precise, I followed this guide [1], with
the difference that instead of "crypt" I used the actual name, luks-
(Disks thanksfully shows everything relevant). It's not the first time I'm
doing this. Yet I experience the errors mentioned. Sure, I'm not usi
On 2024-04-23, Richard wrote:
> luks-775ea946-6797-4c4d-a042-72924309f3d2
> UUID=775ea946-6797-4c4d-a042-72924309f3d2 /crypto_keyfile.bin
> luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
> luks-78362aa3-760c-41de-b911-6531b684e3f7
> UUID=78362aa3-760c-41de-b911-6531b684e3f7 /crypto_keyfile.bin
> luks,keyscript=/
Am Dienstag, 23. April 2024, 22:26:17 CEST schrieb Richard:
Hi Richard,
this is, what I am doing when this happens:
1. booting into a live system (any new is working, I prefer kali-linux)
2. If you are using encrypted filesystems, open it. But you have to name it
like it is named in /
etc/crypt
Hi,
I've just set up a new computer with Debian Testing. I initially set it up
without a swap partition, but I want to add it now. The partition has
already been created as a LUKS2 partition, but I can't get update-initramfs
to add it so it will automatically be decrypted at boot (both
the Graphical Install option on a Live USB SD.
> > >
> > > The swap partition size installed on the HD is 1 GB.
> > >
> > > Buster, etc., used to be about the size of memory, (8 GB in my case,)
> > > for the swap partition size.
> > >
> >
On January 9, 2022 3:24:18 PM Charles Curley
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 22:27:20 +0100
Marco Möller wrote:
It might be difficult to start without a swap partition, but then
realize over time that you need it and getting headaches from where
to free space for it.
Gparted, do a little
On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 22:27:20 +0100
Marco Möller wrote:
> It might be difficult to start without a swap partition, but then
> realize over time that you need it and getting headaches from where
> to free space for it.
You can always add a swap file later on. Linux will work with bo
On Sun, 09 Jan 2022 18:57:26 +0100
Hans wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 9. Januar 2022, 18:45:22 CET schrieb Tixy:
> However, I believe, hibernating will use the swap partition, so I
> think, it might be a good idea, to create a swap partition twice as
> big as the memory, if you want to use
On 08.01.22 17:54, John Conover wrote:
I just installed Bullseye, using default "use entire disk" as the HD
configuration from the Graphical Install option on a Live USB SD.
The swap partition size installed on the HD is 1 GB.
Buster, etc., used to be about the size of memory, (
On January 9, 2022 10:02:21 AM Hans wrote:
Am Sonntag, 9. Januar 2022, 18:45:22 CET schrieb Tixy:
However, I believe, hibernating will use the swap partition, so I think, it
might be a good idea, to create a swap partition twice as big as the memory,
if you want to use it.
Double the 64 GB
Am Sonntag, 9. Januar 2022, 18:45:22 CET schrieb Tixy:
However, I believe, hibernating will use the swap partition, so I think, it
might be a good idea, to create a swap partition twice as big as the memory,
if you want to use it.
Of course you can use any other partition for hibernating, but
> >
>
>
> it's possible not to use swap. Debian installer (in expert mode) shows a
> warning if the user doesn't create swap partition.
Thanks, that's what I do. (My comment about 4MB minimum was with regard
to Windows 2000 ;-)
--
Tixy
On Sun 09 Jan 2022 at 10:14:41 (+), Tixy wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-01-08 at 14:24 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> [...]
> > the alternative is running out of memory, and the OOM killer.
> > Obviously I don't know what you run that clogs the system. Most of my
> > machines have much less RAM than the t
Andrew M.A. Cater writes:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 08:54:43AM -0800, John Conover wrote:
> >
> > I just installed Bullseye, using default "use entire disk" as the HD
> > configuration from the Graphical Install option on a Live USB SD.
> >
> > The swap
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 08:54:43AM -0800, John Conover wrote:
>
> I just installed Bullseye, using default "use entire disk" as the HD
> configuration from the Graphical Install option on a Live USB SD.
>
> The swap partition size installed on the HD is 1 GB.
>
>
rt mode) shows a
warning if the user doesn't create swap partition.
On installed system swap can be turned off with swapoff command and swap
partition can be removed from /etc/fstab manually.
Kind regards
Georgi
On Sat, 2022-01-08 at 14:24 -0600, David Wright wrote:
[...]
> the alternative is running out of memory, and the OOM killer.
> Obviously I don't know what you run that clogs the system. Most of my
> machines have much less RAM than the two mentioned, though they get
> less memory-intensive use nowa
the Graphical Install option on a Live USB SD.
> >>
> >> The swap partition size installed on the HD is 1 GB.
> >>
> >> Buster, etc., used to be about the size of memory, (8 GB in my case,)
> >> for the swap partition size.
> >>
> >> Is th
On 1/8/22, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> On 1/8/22 18:54, John Conover wrote:
>>
>> I just installed Bullseye, using default "use entire disk" as the HD
>> configuration from the Graphical Install option on a Live USB SD.
>>
>> The swap partition size ins
On Sat, 2022-01-08 at 19:18 +0200, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> On 1/8/22 18:54, John Conover wrote:
> >
> > I just installed Bullseye, using default "use entire disk" as the HD
> > configuration from the Graphical Install option on a Live USB SD.
> >
> &g
On 1/8/22 18:54, John Conover wrote:
>
> I just installed Bullseye, using default "use entire disk" as the HD
> configuration from the Graphical Install option on a Live USB SD.
>
> The swap partition size installed on the HD is 1 GB.
>
> Buster, etc., used to be
I just installed Bullseye, using default "use entire disk" as the HD
configuration from the Graphical Install option on a Live USB SD.
The swap partition size installed on the HD is 1 GB.
Buster, etc., used to be about the size of memory, (8 GB in my case,)
for the swap partition
Le 14/12/2019 à 16:35, Ottavio Caruso a écrit :
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 at 13:47, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 14/12/2019 à 14:20, Ottavio Caruso a écrit :
I've also added:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="resume d823f1ee-2e16-4327-b0c1-639f377002bb"
Wrong syntax. It should be "resume=UUID=d823...".
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 at 13:47, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
> Le 14/12/2019 à 14:20, Ottavio Caruso a écrit :
> (...)
> > I've also added:
> > GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="resume d823f1ee-2e16-4327-b0c1-639f377002bb"
>
> Wrong syntax. It should be "resume=UUID=d823...".
> This will override the RESUME
Le 14/12/2019 à 14:20, Ottavio Caruso a écrit :
$ sudo update-initramfs -u -k all
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-11-amd64
I: The initramfs will attempt to resume from /dev/sda7
I: (UUID=d823f1ee-2e16-4327-b0c1-639f377002bb)
I: Set the RESUME variable to override this.
(...)
Le 14/12/2019 à 12:26, Ottavio Caruso a écrit :
$ sudo update-initramfs -u -k all
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-11-amd64
I: The initramfs will attempt to resume from /dev/sda7
I: (UUID=d823f1ee-2e16-4327-b0c1-639f377002bb)
I: Set the RESUME variable to override this.
I'll
Le 14/12/2019 à 10:43, Alexander V. Makartsev a écrit :
Simple swap partition creation is not enough for hibernation to work, it
also has to be configured in initrd. [2]
Despite the file name it is no longer an initrd but an initramfs.
https://wiki.debian.org/Hibernation
oment, the only workaround is to disable swap before suspending.
>
> I have the latest kernel. Where do I start troubleshooting? Any ideas?
>
Best way is to start here. [1]
Dealing with powerstates\hibernation could be complicated, because it
depends on many factors.
Simple swap
hink. I
should
try the same with regular Linux kernel to check this hypothesis).
Now, when coming to the partition creation, it seems that it is
unable to create the swap partition. I will probably try to continue
without one, but in the meantime, if someone have any clue about the
problem, it wi
seems that it is
unable to create the swap partition. I will probably try to continue
without one, but in the meantime, if someone have any clue about the
problem, it will interest me.
The log (TTY4) if filled with messages like this:
Processing event '!system=DEVFS subsystem=CDEV type=CREA
n one installation so I'll find them anew later to report them)
and I did it.
I also tried to do a remote installation through ssh for better
interface (virtualbox is horrible on that) but the installer wa
Now, when coming to the partition creation, it seems that it is unable
to creat
Le 03/02/2014 12:50, Chen Wei a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:38:16AM -0800, Rick Thomas wrote:
For example, if you decide to put /tmp in a ramdisk, you may want to
allocate a swap partition that's much larger than your RAM as backup
in case somebody needs *lots* of space in /tmp.
+
On 03/02/14 23:48, Chen Wei wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:03:19PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> As long as the swap file is not sparse.
>>
>
> Tried *fallocate* to create swapfile then swapon report error, something
> like:
>
> swapon: /path2swapfile : swapon failed: Invalid argument
> fa
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:03:19PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> As long as the swap file is not sparse.
>
Tried *fallocate* to create swapfile then swapon report error, something
like:
swapon: /path2swapfile : swapon failed: Invalid argument
Only figured it out several cups of tea and google-
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Chen Wei wrote:
> Besides, it
> is easier to change the size of a swapfile than size of a swap
> partition.
How about with LVM?
--
"On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.de
On 03/02/14 22:50, Chen Wei wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:38:16AM -0800, Rick Thomas wrote:
>> For example, if you decide to put /tmp in a ramdisk, you may want to
>> allocate a swap partition that's much larger than your RAM as backup
>> in case somebody nee
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:38:16AM -0800, Rick Thomas wrote:
> For example, if you decide to put /tmp in a ramdisk, you may want to
> allocate a swap partition that's much larger than your RAM as backup
> in case somebody needs *lots* of space in /tmp.
+1 for the /tmp example.
>
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
> There is logic for having at least as much swap as you have RAM (in other
> words, a multiplier of 1.0) because, when the system panics, it may want to
> make a copy of RAM to the swap space for later analysis.
Or if the system is a laptop a
an anyone
> tell me how big should the swap partition be?
>
> I've read online that the size of the swap partition should be determined by
> the memory.
> I've therefore copypasted from my terminal below:
>
> free -m
> total used free
hould the swap partition be?
I've read online that the size of the swap partition should be
determined by the memory.
I've therefore copypasted from my terminal below:
free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 7871 1546
Hi.
I intend to install Linux Mint Debian and give up on the Ubuntu based distros.
However when I go through the installer, I get to the point where I'm supposed
to choose the size of the different partitions, but can anyone tell me how big
should the swap partition be?
I've r
When setting up Linux systems, I've always set up a separate swap
> partition. I was reading a few days ago that apparently there's a nifty
> way to do like Windows does (that alone should probably be good enough
> reason to *not* do it... :-) ) and set up a swap *file* instead.
When setting up Linux systems, I've always set up a separate swap
> partition. I was reading a few days ago that apparently there's a nifty
> way to do like Windows does (that alone should probably be good enough
> reason to *not* do it... :-) ) and set up a swap *file* instead.
Hello David,
David Guntner wrote:
> swap *file* instead.
>
> So, anyone? Pros & cons? Is there any reason to prefer one over the other?
Are you sure you need swap at all? If so, will your server still
deliver acceptable performance if it is actively swapping? If yes,
then the performance of t
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While still trying to figure out why Thunderbird isn't working so well
> with Dovecot, I figured I'd move onto another mystery; thought I'd seek
> out some opinions here. :-)
>
> When setting up Linux systems, I've always set up a separate s
Hi all,
While still trying to figure out why Thunderbird isn't working so well
with Dovecot, I figured I'd move onto another mystery; thought I'd seek
out some opinions here. :-)
When setting up Linux systems, I've always set up a separate swap
partition. I was reading
Klaus Jantzen wrote:
Hello,
on my machine I have two HDDs with Windows, Debian and another Linux
system.
Because of the two Linux systems I have two swap partitions.
As I want to remove the other Linux I want to get rid of one of the
swap partitions.
How can I find out which swap partition
ems I have two swap partitions.
> >
> > As I want to remove the other Linux I want to get rid of one of the swap
> > partitions.
> > How can I find out which swap partition is used by Debian and by the
> > other Linux, respectively?
> >
> > With 'df'
of one of the swap
> partitions.
> How can I find out which swap partition is used by Debian and by the
> other Linux, respectively?
>
> With 'df' I only see the file systems mounted e.g. / (root) and /home of
> Debian but not the swap partition.
Actually, even with two
titions.
> How can I find out which swap partition is used by Debian and by the other
> Linux, respectively?
>
> With 'df' I only see the file systems mounted e.g. / (root) and /home of
> Debian but not the swap partition.
"blkid" and "grep swap /
Hello,
on my machine I have two HDDs with Windows, Debian and another Linux system.
Because of the two Linux systems I have two swap partitions.
As I want to remove the other Linux I want to get rid of one of the swap
partitions.
How can I find out which swap partition is used by Debian and by
> Question 1: In the Debian manual it says a swap partition isn't needed but
> recommended for efficiency. Anyone else installed without swap and had
> success? Is my installation a ticking time bomb if I don't have a swap
> partition?
"Recommended for eff
Thanks for the help!
Mark
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <
b...@iguanasuicide.net> wrote:
> In <631fe46c0907271429n387f32bp42606b1755eae...@mail.gmail.com>, Mark
> wrote:
> >I like this idea of using a swap file instead of partition (for both my
> >Debian and Ubuntu mach
In <631fe46c0907271429n387f32bp42606b1755eae...@mail.gmail.com>, Mark wrote:
>I like this idea of using a swap file instead of partition (for both my
>Debian and Ubuntu machines). Is the following code correct for creating
> the swap file (assuming 1 GB swap file size)?
>
># dd if=/dev/zero of=/sw
;, Mark
> wrote:
> >A couple of questions (background is below the questions if you want to
> >read):
> >
> >Question 1: In the Debian manual it says a swap partition isn't needed but
> >recommended for efficiency. Anyone else installed without swap and had
&g
Mark:
>
> Question 1: In the Debian manual it says a swap partition isn't needed but
> recommended for efficiency. Anyone else installed without swap and had
> success? Is my installation a ticking time bomb if I don't have a swap
> partition?
I ran my previous lap
In <631fe46c0907271347g341e048udf74d5ee643e1...@mail.gmail.com>, Mark wrote:
>A couple of questions (background is below the questions if you want to
>read):
>
>Question 1: In the Debian manual it says a swap partition isn't needed but
>recommended for efficiency. Any
A couple of questions (background is below the questions if you want to
read):
Question 1: In the Debian manual it says a swap partition isn't needed but
recommended for efficiency. Anyone else installed without swap and had
success? Is my installation a ticking time bomb if I don't h
The last posting asking about previous windows use. Also, blkid
thought it was ntfs. This made me guess there was a stale superblock from
the previous NTFS use that was confusing linux. So I took the swap
partition off line, used dd to zero the beginning of it, and did
mkswap again. All is now
On 02/19/2009 02:10 AM, Adrian Levi wrote:
[snip]
Why do you want 2 swap partitions?
One on sda1 and another on hda1.
Spread the pain. Accessing two "small" swap partitions each thru a
different cable gives you better throughput than one huge swap file
thru a single cable.
--
Ron Johnson,
2009/2/19 Marc Auslander :
> Adrian Levi writes:
> It follows. /dev/hda1 looks funny, doesn't it? Like no UUID. How do
> I fix?
>
>
> fdisk -l /dev/hda
>
> Disk /dev/hda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 by
Adrian Levi writes:
> 2009/2/18 :
> > Adrian Levi writes:
> >
> >> 2009/2/18 :
> >> > I'm trying to prepare my etch system for upgrade, and am converting to
> >> > labels in fstab.
> >> >
> >> > I tried t
2009/2/18 :
> Adrian Levi writes:
>
>> 2009/2/18 :
>> > I'm trying to prepare my etch system for upgrade, and am converting to
>> > labels in fstab.
>> >
>> > I tried to label my swap partition (which is swap type in part table) by
>>
Adrian Levi writes:
> 2009/2/18 :
> > I'm trying to prepare my etch system for upgrade, and am converting to
> > labels in fstab.
> >
> > I tried to label my swap partition (which is swap type in part table) by
> > doing
> > mkswap -L rootswap
2009/2/18 :
> I'm trying to prepare my etch system for upgrade, and am converting to
> labels in fstab.
>
> I tried to label my swap partition (which is swap type in part table) by doing
> mkswap -L rootswap /dev/hda1 (the current dev name of my swap partition)
>
> but
I'm trying to prepare my etch system for upgrade, and am converting to
labels in fstab.
I tried to label my swap partition (which is swap type in part table) by doing
mkswap -L rootswap /dev/hda1 (the current dev name of my swap partition)
but swapon -L rootswap says it can't find the
> * From: ISHWAR RATTAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I have a 1Gb primary swap partition (/dev/sda1)
>and fdisk -l shows that.
fdisk read the partition table from the disk, but the kernel data can be
seen in /proc/partitions (it is read at boot time)
> # swapon /dev/sda1
>says
ISHWAR RATTAN:
>
> I have a 1Gb primary swap partition (/dev/sda1)
> and fdisk -l shows that. But the command
>
> # swapon /dev/sda1
>
> says that ..:/dev/sda1: is invalid argument.
Did you create a "swap filesystem" on the partition?
# mkswap /dev/sda1 &&a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/05/08 08:17, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
>
> I have a 1Gb primary swap partition (/dev/sda1)
> and fdisk -l shows that. But the command
>
> # swapon /dev/sda1
>
> says that ..:/dev/sda1: is invalid argument.
> I made an
I have a 1Gb primary swap partition (/dev/sda1)
and fdisk -l shows that. But the command
# swapon /dev/sda1
says that ..:/dev/sda1: is invalid argument.
I made an entry in /etc/fstab (too):
/dev/sda1 none swap sw 0 0
but swapon -a still syays that it is invalid argument!
Any pointers
what I did when I found out that my RAM size
>> is larger than my swap partition.
>>
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the options for resizing
> partitions without losing data is pretty limited. I recently went
> through a round of resizing, and whil
Jimmy Wu wrote:
> I always thought resizing or doing any partition editing carried some
> risk of losing data (ie no guarantees), but perhaps ext3 is different.
>
The "no guarantees" disclaimer goes with pretty much all of the GPL
software. The users always have to make backups. No software is 1
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Jimmy Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just as an experiment, I did a sudo hibernate -v3 > hibernate.out, and
> it says that it was unable to unload nvidia and aborts hibernation
> (see attached file). So I guess pm-hibernate kind of went ahead and
> shut down
RAM size is larger
> than my swap partition.
>
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the options for resizing
partitions without losing data is pretty limited. I recently went
through a round of resizing, and while I could move swap into adjacent
unused space, I could only alter the
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jimmy Wu wrote:
>
> >>From what I've read online, I get the general idea that in order to be
> > able to hibernate/suspend to disk properly, the swap partition has to
> >
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Chris Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is High memory support turned on in the kernel? This could explain why
> hibernation is working whilst you have 2gig's in the system.
>
> Processor type and features
> -> High Memory Support
>
I remember seeing suc
Jimmy Wu wrote:
>>From what I've read online, I get the general idea that in order to be
> able to hibernate/suspend to disk properly, the swap partition has to
> be big enough to hold all of the RAM inside it, right?
>
> Is it possible to hibernate if my swap partition i
On 22/02/2008, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jimmy Wu wrote:
> > From what I've read online, I get the general idea that in order to be
> > able to hibernate/suspend to disk properly, the swap partition has to
> > be big enough to hold all of the RAM i
Jimmy Wu wrote:
> From what I've read online, I get the general idea that in order to be
> able to hibernate/suspend to disk properly, the swap partition has to
> be big enough to hold all of the RAM inside it, right?
>
> Is it possible to hibernate if my swap partition is s
ea that in order
> to be
> > > > able to hibernate/suspend to disk properly, the swap partition has
> to
> > > > be big enough to hold all of the RAM inside it, right?
> > [...]
> >
> > > Yes, you'll need to have the same sized swap as
be
> > > able to hibernate/suspend to disk properly, the swap partition has to
> > > be big enough to hold all of the RAM inside it, right?
> [...]
>
> > Yes, you'll need to have the same sized swap as RAM, although from
> > memory there is a way
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Rich Healey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Jimmy Wu wrote:
> >>From what I've read online, I get the general idea that in order to be
> > able to hibernate/suspend to disk properly, the swap partition has to
> > be big e
>From what I've read online, I get the general idea that in order to be
able to hibernate/suspend to disk properly, the swap partition has to
be big enough to hold all of the RAM inside it, right?
Is it possible to hibernate if my swap partition is smaller than my
RAM? I have 2 GB of
On Jan 26, 2008, at 3:56 AM, Mike Kuhar wrote:
I think that's quite reasonable.
-mike
(Sorry to be late to the show.)
All my systems run from a single disk drive. I put the
swap partition as close to the middle of the disk on the
theory that that'll minimize seek time for a
I think that's quite reasonable.
-mike
(Sorry to be late to the show.)
All my systems run from a single disk drive. I put the
swap partition as close to the middle of the disk on the
theory that that'll minimize seek time for a function I want
to run as quickly as possible
(Sorry to be late to the show.)
All my systems run from a single disk drive. I put the
swap partition as close to the middle of the disk on the
theory that that'll minimize seek time for a function I want
to run as quickly as possible. Is this reasonable?
--
Best w
Am 2008-01-18 23:48:28, schrieb ??. :
> I don't think it would make too much a difference on modern HDs. Most
> read-write
> will occur in user's home directories anyways - loading binaries and libes
> alright, but the data and config files come from the home-d
Am 2008-01-18 14:18:50, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I like to put mine on a disk.
>
> Just kidding. My actual question is, should I put any thought into
> where on the disk I place the swap partition? At the beginning of the
> disk? At the end? I thought it might be best to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-Jan-08, at 12:40 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 08:50:26AM -0500, Brian McKee wrote:
On 23-Jan-08, at 9:09 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/23/08 19:44, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
The last time I had an actual real-live VT2
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 08:50:26AM -0500, Brian McKee wrote:
> On 23-Jan-08, at 9:09 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >On 01/23/08 19:44, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >The last time I had an actual real-live VT220 on my desk was 1991.
>
> I've got a bunch of them here on a skid if you want another one :-)
>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 09:28:06PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 08:09:39PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 01/23/08 19:44, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:17:50PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > >> Have you yet bitched and complained how kids toda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23-Jan-08, at 9:09 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/08 19:44, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:17:50PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
I'm really gettin' old!
Have you yet bitched and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/08 20:28, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 08:09:39PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 01/23/08 19:44, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:17:50PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Have you yet bitched and compl
1 - 100 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
