Le 21/02/2018 à 14:07, Louis Wust a écrit :
Is your swap partition large enough to hold the contents of your RAM? It
doesn't need to match (or exceed) the system memory capacity, but it
should be reasonably large. Suspend-to-disk won't work if it is too
small, but I'm not sure w
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018, at 16:12, Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I am working on a little problem. Just let me shortly describe:
>
> When I am running suspend-to-disk, I can see, that the RAM is saved to
> the partition (in my case I defined the swap partition).
Is your swap partition
Hi folks,
I am working on a little problem. Just let me shortly describe:
When I am running suspend-to-disk, I can see, that the RAM is saved to the
partition (in
my case I defined the swap partition).
Everything is working fine, after that writing to disk, the computer is
shutting down. So
Hi folks,
since some months I got problems with suspend-to-disk.
Running debin/testing I have /usr, /var and /home encrypted. Suspend-to-disk
worked a long time, whilst the suspend/resume device was /dev/mapper/usr.
But after some update, this does not work any more. Even, when I am using my
Hi Filip,
>
> You can simulate it on the command line with:
>
> $ dbus-send --print-reply --system \
> --dest=org.freedesktop.UPower \
> /org/freedesktop/UPower\
> org.freedesktop.UPower.Hibernate
>
Checked this and giving this command in a shell is working. So i
Filip wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:39:43 +0200
Hans wrote:
Hi folks,
I am looking for a problem in KDE.
Problem: I cannot suspend to disk in KDE from the menu. The button
exists, but has no effekt.
Suspend-to-ram is working well in KDE.
On the other hand the commands "hibernate
On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:39:43 +0200
Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am looking for a problem in KDE.
>
> Problem: I cannot suspend to disk in KDE from the menu. The button
> exists, but has no effekt.
>
> Suspend-to-ram is working well in KDE.
>
> On the othe
Hi folks,
I am looking for a problem in KDE.
Problem: I cannot suspend to disk in KDE from the menu. The button exists, but
has no effekt.
Suspend-to-ram is working well in KDE.
On the other hand the commands "hibernate-disk" and "hibernate-ram" as root
are working
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 06:52:39 -0800
kei...@strucktower.com wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I can't say why, but my resume from sleep problems went away after I moved
> to a 3.0 kernel with wheezy. I don't use hibernate. I have a Thinkpad
> T520.
Thanks. I haven't yet begun with sleep, partially since I haven't
I recently installed Squeeze onto a T61. Hibernation (via the
'hibernate' command, or 'pm-hibernate') always seems to work, but the
system doesn't always come back up. The first time after a reboot it
seems to always come back, but it often / usually fails the second or
third time. I'm running amd6
Hi Jeffrin,
Thanks for the advice.
> I think some module which help in the suspend/resume
> process has failed to complete initialization.
> EDAC(Error Correction And Detection) module might
> have found error in a device or may be the module
> needs a patch.
>
> You can do dmesg | grep edac and
Camaleón writes:
> Well, no kernel oops is "good" but if you can reproduce this kernel bug
> every time you trigger the hibernation from GNOME when resuming the
> system, at least you can open a bug for this in Debian BTS. You are
> clearly having some sort of problem with the kernel.
Right o
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:56:26 -0800, Richard Lawrence wrote:
> Thanks, Camaleón, for these suggestions.
>
>> Make a quick and easy test: create a new user and try to
>> hibernate/resume from there and see how it goes.
>
> Ok, here's where I'm at:
>
> 1) A new user (pmtest) can indeed hibernate a
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:56:10PM -0800, Richard Lawrence wrote:
> But I'm uncertain where to look for more information (I can't find
> anything more informative anywhere in /var/log), or how to go about
> determining whether this is a configuration issue I can fix or a bug
> that I should file.
>
Thanks, Camaleón, for these suggestions.
> Make a quick and easy test: create a new user and try to hibernate/resume
> from there and see how it goes.
Ok, here's where I'm at:
1) A new user (pmtest) can indeed hibernate and resume from the console
without issue
2) My regular user account (rwl)
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:56:10 -0800, Richard Lawrence wrote:
> I upgraded from Lenny to Squeeze this past weekend. Since then, I
> haven't been able to successfully resume after a suspend to disk, which
> had been working fine in Lenny (with Linux 2.6.26). Basically, on boot,
>
Hi all,
I upgraded from Lenny to Squeeze this past weekend. Since then, I
haven't been able to successfully resume after a suspend to disk, which
had been working fine in Lenny (with Linux 2.6.26). Basically, on boot,
I see a blinking cursor, followed by a completely blank (unresponsive
og does not show anything obviously wrong (to me).
> I can post that when I get home.
>
> I don't understand why devices need to quiesce on resume. Are drivers
> loaded first, then need to make room for the drivers that were in the
> suspended image?
>
> Does anyone have any ide
iesce on resume. Are drivers
loaded first, then need to make room for the drivers that were in the
suspended image?
Does anyone have any idea why I am unable to resume from a hibernation
state? Or is there something wrong with the suspend to disk in the
first place? Is the ata3 error meaningful
stead Powerdevil- to get the job
done (whether available).
- You can remove the package responsible for hibernation (swsusp/uswsusp)
to avoid the computer going into S4 state. I find this approach a little
radical, meaning I wouldn't take that path, but that is up to you.
Powerdevil just shows
our data is much safer in the
> > > long run if you restrain yourself to suspend-to-RAM and shutdowns.
> >
> > Can you elaborate on this? I have certainly experienced my share of
>
> Yes. Suspend-to-disk on Linux x86/amd64 depends on fragile operations, and
>
On Friday 03 September 2010 18:47:20 Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:22:52 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Lisi:
> >> > No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is
> >> > no option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny s
.
>
> Can you elaborate on this? I have certainly experienced my share of
Yes. Suspend-to-disk on Linux x86/amd64 depends on fragile operations, and
worse, it requires that the hibernation core and some of the more fiendishly
complex kernel subsystems never disagree at all on the details.
Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
> >> > No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is
> >> > no option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you
> >> > can see the problematic combo box and the hibernation (Tiefschlaf)
> >> > button right unde
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:22:52 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Lisi:
>
>> > No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is
>> > no option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you
>> > can see the problematic combo box
Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Lisi:
> > No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is no
> > option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you can
> > see the problematic combo box and the hibernation (Tiefschlaf) button
> > right underneath.
>
> I'm
On Thursday 02 September 2010 21:11:33 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
> > On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:40:56 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
> > >> I meant you can hibernate your computer with any am
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:32:03 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
...
> That said, I don't trust hybernation. Your data is much safer in the
> long run if you restrain yourself to suspend-to-RAM and shutdowns.
Can you elaborate on this? I have certainly experienced my share of
hibernation
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:11:33 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
(...)
>> > Booting to the login screeen takes ~35–40 seconds here. Plus another
>> > half minute to load the DE. Usually I am using normal standby (aka
>> > suspend to RAM). Powerde
Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
> On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:40:56 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
> >> I meant you can hibernate your computer with any amount of ram
> >> available, there are still restoring speed gains in some
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Jo, 02 sep 10, 07:39:09, Camaleón wrote:
> > Amount of ram should not be a relevant key value for benefiting of
> > hibernation.
>
> Unless there's something I'm missing, copying the contents of the RAM to
> HDD and back heavily depends on the tota
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:40:56 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
>
>> I meant you can hibernate your computer with any amount of ram
>> available, there are still restoring speed gains in some computers.
>> Your mileage may vary.
>
> But you also
Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
> I meant you can hibernate your computer with any amount of ram available,
> there are still restoring speed gains in some computers. Your mileage may
> vary.
But you also need as much space on the HDD to store the RAM content, which I
don’t re
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:03:33 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Jo, 02 sep 10, 07:39:09, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> Amount of ram should not be a relevant key value for benefiting of
>> hibernation.
>
> Unless there's something I'm missing, copying the contents of the RAM to
> HDD and back heavily dep
On Jo, 02 sep 10, 07:39:09, Camaleón wrote:
>
> Amount of ram should not be a relevant key value for benefiting of
> hibernation.
Unless there's something I'm missing, copying the contents of the RAM to
HDD and back heavily depends on the total data available in RAM, which
tends to be higher d
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:11:27 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> because I can’t make Powerdevil (KDE’s power management utility) hide
> the "Hibernate" button (which I hit accidentially from time to time),
> I’d like to disable the suspend to disk feature on my system. It’s not
Hello List,
because I can’t make Powerdevil (KDE’s power management utility) hide the
"Hibernate" button (which I hit accidentially from time to time), I’d like to
disable the suspend to disk feature on my system. It’s not practical anyway
(it’s a laptop with 3 GB of RAM).
So w
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:37:36PM +0200, lee wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:31:51PM +0200, Klistvud wrote:
> > Dne, 28. 06. 2010 18:30:42 je lee napisal(a):
> > >
> > >Yes, but I don't want to suspend to RAM because the point is to save
> > >power, and suspend to RAM will fail when the power
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 06:02:47PM +0200, lee wrote:
> > If developers are not aware of your situation, they cannot correct the
> > bugs
>
> Still filing bug reports doesn't seem to achieve anything these days.
Do you mean that, because of this …
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?subm
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 06:14:07PM +0200, lee wrote:
> It's ppl using computers and running software on them; computers don't
> run all by themselves, …
Umm, no. Someone logging in, is a major annoyance to its real work. :-)
--
Chris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debia
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 18:02:47 +0200
lee wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 04:00:57PM +, Camaleón wrote:
...
> > If developers are not aware of your situation, they cannot correct the
> > bugs
>
> Still filing bug reports doesn't seem to achieve anything these days.
Overbroad generalization.
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:33:34 +0200, lee wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 04:42:46PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> You cannot disconnect the main disk because hibernation saves the image
>> of the running system there (unless you manually change the location).
>
> Sure I can disconnect the disks. But
Lisi writes:
[...]
> I do not know about Germany, but here the shop/firm would be likely to
> say that installing Linux counts as misuse, or at any rate is not
> covered, and would in all probability have no difficulty persuading
> both Trading Standards Officers and the courts to agree with them.
t;my" objections but how things work. If you don't like it,
I'm afraid I can only say "sorry for you".
> I was saying that suspend to
> disk is something that should work out of the box.
In an ideal world, yes, *anything* should just work out the box...
> Th
n try with a LiveCD to avoid data loss. Nowadays you have many
> >> choices to test hibernation in a safe environment.
> >
> > There's nothing save about turning off and on the hardware many times
> > consecutively. I could disconnect the disks to minimize the
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 05:06:02PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> No, I think you still ignore what is this all about. I'll try to make it
> short and easy:
Your objections are completely irrelevant. I was saying that suspend
to disk is something that should work out of the box. The Debia
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:14:07 +0200, lee wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 08:42:02PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:40:32 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>>
>> > Excuse me but are you *really* saying that anyone "there" would buy a
>> > car that only certain people can operate with
hibernation in a safe environment.
>
> There's nothing save about turning off and on the hardware many times
> consecutively. I could disconnect the disks to minimize the risks, but
> then it won't be possible to test suspend to disk.
You cannot disconnect the main disk
On Sunday 04 July 2010 17:14:07 lee wrote:
> It's ppl using computers and running software on them; computers don't
> run all by themselves, just like cars. Same is with refrigerators: You
> don't get a certificate telling you exactly which goods you may put
> into your fridge. But you expect your
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 08:42:02PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:40:32 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 04:00:57PM +, Camale�n wrote:
> >> On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:11:03 +0200, lee wrote:
> >
> > .snip.
> >
> >> > And who
but
then it won't be possible to test suspend to disk.
> If developers are not aware of your situation, they cannot correct the
> bugs
Still filing bug reports doesn't seem to achieve anything these days.
> > No, you're doing that. It's just hardware, and if it doe
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:40:32 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 04:00:57PM +, Camale�n wrote:
>> On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:11:03 +0200, lee wrote:
>
> .snip.
>
>> > And who would buy a car that comes with a certificate that only the
>> > ppl name
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 04:00:57PM +, Camale�n wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:11:03 +0200, lee wrote:
.snip.
> > And who would buy a car that comes with a
> > certificate that only the ppl named in the certificate are allowed to
> > use it and that otherwise the c
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:11:03 +0200, lee wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 07:10:58PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> So... when something goes wrong, you need to debug it, whatever it is
>> (hibernation or something else). And debugging usually requires some
>> "sacrifices" >:-) (meaning, trial and e
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 07:10:58PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> So... when something goes wrong, you need to debug it, whatever it is
> (hibernation or something else). And debugging usually requires some
> "sacrifices" >:-) (meaning, trial and error tests).
Insofar such testing involves eventual
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:29:00 +0200, lee wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:44:58PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> And how do you interpret that? Do you see any line about the freeze and
>> hibernation? As per your own subject on this thread, I'd say "yes".
>
> My interpretation is that it doesn't wo
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:44:58PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:45:30 +0200, lee wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:21:08PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> >> Then you should read about how to debugg "swsusp" when restoration
> >> fails :-)
> >
> > The resuming didn't fail, bu
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:45:30 +0200, lee wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:21:08PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> Then you should read about how to debugg "swsusp" when restoration
>> fails :-)
>
> The resuming didn't fail, but shortly after, the computer froze.
And how do you interpret that? Do y
ata to disk and then suspend-to-ram.
But what's the advantage of suspending to RAM supposed to be? It
doesn't matter to me that resuming from disk takes half a minute or so
longer than it would take to resume from RAM.
As to magnitutes, during the suspend, it takes indefinitely more power
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:21:08PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:22:48 +0200, lee wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 04:05:57PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> >> Where did you get that steps to hibernate? :-?
> >
> > It's in the kernel dokumentation, see Documentation/power/swsus
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:31:51PM +0200, Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 28. 06. 2010 18:30:42 je lee napisal(a):
> >
> >Yes, but I don't want to suspend to RAM because the point is to save
> >power, and suspend to RAM will fail when the power fails.
>
> In that case, pm-suspend-hybrid should give you the
On Lu, 28 iun 10, 18:30:42, lee wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:16:07AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > I do not exactly know your problem but suspend and hibernate are not always
> > exclusive things. Some configuration puts system into suspend to memory
> > while
> > having the same data sto
Dne, 28. 06. 2010 18:30:42 je lee napisal(a):
Yes, but I don't want to suspend to RAM because the point is to save
power, and suspend to RAM will fail when the power fails.
In that case, pm-suspend-hybrid should give you the best of both
worlds. Anyway, suspend to RAM *does* save some power
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:22:48 +0200, lee wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 04:05:57PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> Where did you get that steps to hibernate? :-?
>
> It's in the kernel dokumentation, see Documentation/power/swsusp.txt.
Then you should read about how to debugg "swsusp" when restorati
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:16:07AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do not exactly know your problem but suspend and hibernate are not always
> exclusive things. Some configuration puts system into suspend to memory while
> having the same data stored into harddisk too. So you win in both bo
e point is saving power by turning off the computer (like over
night) and yet be able to continue exactly where you left. The only
alternative to suspend to disk is to leave it running, which is what
I'm trying to avoid to save power.
If it doesn't work 100% reliably without a lot of tes
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 04:05:57PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:28:45 +0200, lee wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 01:43:49PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> >> And how do you suspend to disk? By pressing a button, running a
> >> script...? Yo
Hi,
I do not exactly know your problem but suspend and hibernate are not always
exclusive things. Some configuration puts system into suspend to memory while
having the same data stored into harddisk too. So you win in both boot time
and complete battery drain situation.
see uswsusp package.
D
Dne, 27. 06. 2010 18:24:28 je Mark napisal(a):
I realize it's mostly due to the drivers not being open. Sometimes
the
headache and tears are because we realize we have to accept a
compromise.
In my case, the compromise I had to accept was with the (flaky) closed
Broadcom wireless driver.
On Du, 27 iun 10, 09:24:28, Mark wrote:
> I would never use Suspend on a desktop due to lack of battery/UPS present.
> As for Hibernate, it takes as long to do a fresh boot as a resume from
> Hibernate on my desktops so really there's not much point there.
Especially if your session manager can
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Camaleón wrote:
[snip]
> I for one do not use hibernation neither suspension at all
[snip]
The only machine I use Suspend on is a laptop running Windows, because (a)
it's a laptop and has a built-in UPS should power go out, and (b) Windows
nvidia drivers resu
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:28:45 +0200, lee wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 01:43:49PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> And how do you suspend to disk? By pressing a button, running a
>> script...? You said in your first writing that "(sic) after suspending
>> to disk during the
gt; send the machine to hibernate?
> >
> > Currently, I'm using fvwm-crystal. The pm-utils package is installed,
> > and now I installed and configured uswsusp.
>
> And how do you suspend to disk? By pressing a button, running a
> script...? You said in your first writing that
ge is installed,
> and now I installed and configured uswsusp.
And how do you suspend to disk? By pressing a button, running a
script...? You said in your first writing that "(sic) after suspending to
disk during the night and resuming..." you were having problems to
resto
if any? and how do you send
> the machine to hibernate?
Currently, I'm using fvwm-crystal. The pm-utils package is installed,
and now I installed and configured uswsusp.
Right now I'm asking myself exactly that question: Just how do I
suspend to disk now?
> You need to keep ram po
f the computer
are dumped into ram... and remember ram is "volatile": if not powered, no
info can be stored and kept there :-)
> Is there a good documentation about suspend to disk for Debian?
I only found the above page :-?
>> Suspend to disk (hibernation) uses swap sp
p
the RAM powered?
Is there a good documentation about suspend to disk for Debian?
> Suspend to disk (hibernation) uses swap space to put the image data there
> when you trigger the hibernation scripts, so you need to have this value
> adjusted in order to success.
That's what
uired swap space
>> accordingly. At least it should be nice to have such option, but dunno
>> if it's already present or not :-?
>
> Oh, I mean the setting in /sys/power/image_size. The kernel knows how
> much RAM is available and how much is needed to suspend to disk
so I got no
> advice, which is normal. But default installer and automatic partitioning
> should indeed ask the user and if he/she wants to hibertante the machine
> and adjust the amount of required swap space accordingly. At least it
> should be nice to have such option, but dunno if it&#x
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:28:36 +0200, lee wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 10:13:23AM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> No, but there can be problems with some of your devices or drivers that
>> prevent restoring from hibernation "gracefully". You'll have to
>> investigate a bit. Review your log.
>
> But
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 10:13:23AM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:58:09 +0200, lee wrote:
>
> > after suspending to disk during the night and resuming, my computer
> > froze with a black screen after running maybe three minutes.
> >
> > Is s
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:58:09 +0200, lee wrote:
> after suspending to disk during the night and resuming, my computer
> froze with a black screen after running maybe three minutes.
>
> Is suspend to disk that unreliable?
No, but there can be problems with some of your devices or
Hi,
after suspending to disk during the night and resuming, my computer
froze with a black screen after running maybe three minutes.
Is suspend to disk that unreliable?
When suspending to disk, the default size of the image written is
512MB. What happens when there's more data that needs
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:09:36 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>> BTW, how do you call the hibernation state? You should type
>> "hibernation" in a text console (gnome-terminal, xterm, konsole...).
>
> That was it: I used the GNOME shutdown dialog: I thought it would call
> hibernate
Camaleón writes:
> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:06:13 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
>
>> Felix Natter writes:
>>
>>> so verbosity 1 should output something, but I will try 4.
>>
>> Changing verbosity didn't help, I still have no hibernate.log anywhere
>> in /var.
hello Camaleon,
> So you changed "Verb
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:06:13 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> Felix Natter writes:
>
>> so verbosity 1 should output something, but I will try 4.
>
> Changing verbosity didn't help, I still have no hibernate.log anywhere
> in /var.
So you changed "Verbosity 4" and "LogVerbosity 4" but still nothing
Felix Natter writes:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:33:59 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
>>
>>> Camaleón writes:
>>>
What does "/var/log/hibernate.log" say?
>>>
>>> /var/log/hibernate* does not exist after a (succesful) resume, although
>>> this is in common.conf:
>>>
>>> Ver
Camaleón writes:
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:33:59 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>>
>>> What does "/var/log/hibernate.log" say?
>>
>> /var/log/hibernate* does not exist after a (succesful) resume, although
>> this is in common.conf:
>>
>> Verbosity 0
>> LogFile /var/log/hiberna
This site has great resources on fixing suspend problems:
http://hal.freedesktop.org/quirk/quirk-suspend-index.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/h
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:33:59 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> What does "/var/log/hibernate.log" say?
>
> /var/log/hibernate* does not exist after a (succesful) resume, although
> this is in common.conf:
>
> Verbosity 0
> LogFile /var/log/hibernate.log
> LogVerbosity 1
>
> An
Camaleón writes:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:36:29 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>> So does this command cause hibernate to read
>> /etc/hibernate/blacklisted-modules, or do I have to add UnloadModules
>> uvcvideo
>> ?
hello,
> What does "/var/log/hibernate.log" say?
/var/log/hibernate*
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:36:29 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
(...)
> So does this command cause hibernate to read
> /etc/hibernate/blacklisted-modules, or do I have to add UnloadModules
> uvcvideo
> ?
What does "/var/log/hibernate.log" say?
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
hello,
I am having problems with the uvcvideo module (driver for webcam)
when resuming from Suspend To Disk on Debian Lenny (with the latest
updates) with a 2.6.30 kernel.
When I wanted to blacklist this module for suspend, I noticed that
it is already in /etc/hibernate/blacklisted-modules.
My
> I just tried out powersave for suspending to RAM or disk and was quite
> impressed that it all worked without any tweaking whatsoever. Well,
> almost, that is. When I use suspend-to-disk, then resume, my usb
> optical mouse isn't initialized (light/laser/whatever is off) until
I just tried out powersave for suspending to RAM or disk and was quite
impressed that it all worked without any tweaking whatsoever. Well,
almost, that is. When I use suspend-to-disk, then resume, my usb
optical mouse isn't initialized (light/laser/whatever is off) until I
hit a key o
by the way, anyone succeeded in making suspend to disk work with nvidia
drivers?
thanks in advance
--
+-+
| Lorenzo Bettini ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 |
| Home Page: http://www.lorenzobettini.it|
| http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Jeff Zhang wrote:
>> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>>> Jeff Zhang wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i add resume=/dev/hda6 (it's swap partition) to menu.list of grub and
"echo "disk" > /sys/
Jeff Zhang wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Jeff Zhang wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i add resume=/dev/hda6 (it's swap partition) to menu.list of grub and
"echo "disk" > /sys/power/state" looks working well when shutdown.
However, it can't work after reboot and swap partiti
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Jeff Zhang wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i add resume=/dev/hda6 (it's swap partition) to menu.list of grub and
"echo "disk" > /sys/power/state" looks working well when shutdown.
However, it can't work after reboot and swap partition need to mkswap t
Jeff Zhang wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i add resume=/dev/hda6 (it's swap partition) to menu.list of grub and
"echo "disk" > /sys/power/state" looks working well when shutdown.
However, it can't work after reboot and swap partition need to mkswap to
swapon.
Using hibern
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
