Re: Subversion version 1.1

2004-10-29 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2004-10-28 12:00:06 +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote: > Alan Chandler wrote: > >I tried to find out why subversion 1.1 is still sitting in experimental > >rather than making its way into unstable, but I was unable to find out any > >reason, despite seaching development and this mailing list for an

Re: Subversion version 1.1

2004-10-28 Thread Alan Chandler
On Thursday 28 October 2004 11:00, Joost Witteveen wrote: > Alan Chandler wrote: > >I tried to find out why subversion 1.1 is still sitting in experimental > > rather than making its way into unstable, but I was unable to find out > > any reason, despite seaching development and this mailing list f

Re: Subversion version 1.1

2004-10-28 Thread Joost Witteveen
Alan Chandler wrote: I tried to find out why subversion 1.1 is still sitting in experimental rather than making its way into unstable, but I was unable to find out any reason, despite seaching development and this mailing list for any discussion about it. Anyone any ideas when we will see it.

Subversion version 1.1

2004-10-26 Thread Alan Chandler
I tried to find out why subversion 1.1 is still sitting in experimental rather than making its way into unstable, but I was unable to find out any reason, despite seaching development and this mailing list for any discussion about it. Anyone any ideas when we will see it. -- Alan Chandler [EMA