Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:49:26PM -0700, Michael Montagne wrote:
[...]
In my effort to make it work from a single database of bayesian data, I
had added -x to /etc/defaults/spamassassin. This caused bayes to not
work. It works fine now as this report shows.
Colin, it was
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:49:26PM -0700, Michael Montagne wrote:
> It takes quite a while of forced learning before bayes kicks in. you
> must feed it a lot of spam and ham before it works at all. Not sure of
> the amount but I bet that is what is happening.
Yes, you need 200 of each before it
It takes quite a while of forced learning before bayes kicks in. you
must feed it a lot of spam and ham before it works at all. Not sure of
the amount but I bet that is what is happening. Do you see any bayes
tests going on?
>On about 28/05/03, Patrick Kirk was heard to proclaim:
> Hi all.
>
My SpamAssassin version is 2.54 (1.174.2.17-2003-05-11-exp) installed on
Woody.
Arthur H. Johnson II wrote:
What version of SpamAssassin are you using? AutoLearn just appeared in
2.50 or 2.52. I have my installations autolearning right now.
Hi all.
I have tried to put one caentral bayes datab
What version of SpamAssassin are you using? AutoLearn just appeared in
2.50 or 2.52. I have my installations autolearning right now.
> Hi all.
>
> I have tried to put one caentral bayes database for all accounts and
> for some reason it isn't working. I never see auto-learn=ham or
> auto-learn=
Hi all.
I have tried to put one caentral bayes database for all accounts and
for some reason it isn't working. I never see auto-learn=ham or
auto-learn=spam after messages.
Can anyone see if I've made some error of syntax?
--
Patrick
"Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and pr
6 matches
Mail list logo
