Re: Spamassassin Configuration

On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 08:44:52PM -0700, Steve C. Lamb wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 10:24:26PM -0500, Will Trillich wrote: > > where's the list of all the tests, and what they do? man > > Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf tells about customization directives, > > but not the tests themselves... > >

Re: Spamassassin Configuration

Will Trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > where's the list of all the tests, and what they do? man > Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf tells about customization > directives, but not the tests themselves... /usr/share/spamassassin/* Feri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Re: Spamassassin Configuration

On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 10:24:26PM -0500, Will Trillich wrote: > where's the list of all the tests, and what they do? man > Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf tells about customization directives, > but not the tests themselves... > pointers? dpkg -L spamassassin locate spamassassin :) --

Re: Spamassassin Configuration

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 22:24:26 -0500, Will Trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:11:27PM -0400, ScruLoose wrote: > > As others have noted, virus traffic is not actually the same as > > spam-traffic, and you might want a particular tool for each job... > > > > That being

Re: OT: Spam was Re: Spamassassin Configuration

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 06:07:05PM -0400, ScruLoose wrote: > Or I could take the plunge and switch to an address on my own > domain, on my own mailserver. (The current one is hosted by my > ISP.) But if I do that, I'll be all tempted to upgrade to > exim4 with the funky integration with SA to do SM

Re: Spamassassin Configuration

On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:11:27PM -0400, ScruLoose wrote: > As others have noted, virus traffic is not actually the same as > spam-traffic, and you might want a particular tool for each job... > > That being said, what worked for me was to grab a backport of > spamassassin 2.55 for woody from ht

Re: OT: Spam was Re: Spamassassin Configuration

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:06:47AM -0600, Jacob Anawalt wrote: > ScruLoose wrote: > > >As others have noted, virus traffic is not actually the same as > >spam-traffic, and you might want a particular tool for each job... > Back on topic, I agree that it is important to realize that different >

OT: Spam was Re: Spamassassin Configuration

ScruLoose wrote: As others have noted, virus traffic is not actually the same as spam-traffic, and you might want a particular tool for each job... To me they are both Spam. I did not ask to recieve either, and they are both attempting to fill the mailboxes of several users on the same syste

Re: Spamassassin Configuration

On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:33:28PM +0200, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote: > Hello all, > > At this moment I'm receiving loads of spam, mostly with virusses included on > my postfix mail server. I downloaded and installed spamassassin and amavis > with Clam antivirus, but I don't know how to configure. Th

RE: Spamassassin Configuration

Vineet Kumar schreef op zaterdag 27 september 2003 18:47: > * Willem-Jan Meijer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030927 > 06:54]: >> My antivirus is working well, but all those MS mails are very >> annoying Better delete before seeing it :) > > Consider, at least temporarily, bloc

Re: Spamassassin Configuration

* Willem-Jan Meijer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030927 06:54]: > My antivirus is working well, but all those MS mails are very annoying > Better delete before seeing it :) Consider, at least temporarily, blocking anything with an exe attachment at smtp time. I started this a few days ago on my mail serv

RE: Spamassassin Configuration

Richard Humphrey schreef op zaterdag 27 september 2003 15:09: > I am using the newest version of Spamassassin on Debian unstable and > it doesnt catch these types of emails correctly. Your best bet is to > find a procmail rule (if you are using procmail) or search for a

Re: Spamassassin Configuration

On Sam, 2003-09-27 at 14:33, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote: > Can someone help me cofiguring > spamasassin so that I get rid of those ms security-mails? check google and the extensive threads in the archives from the last couple of days/weeks. You are not the only one being hit. Basically, score MICROS

Re: Spamassassin Configuration

I am using the newest version of Spamassassin on Debian unstable and it doesnt catch these types of emails correctly. Your best bet is to find a procmail rule (if you are using procmail) or search for a postfix hack. i have seen a few out there. Sa is for catching spam, which it seems that these v

Spamassassin Configuration

Hello all, At this moment I'm receiving loads of spam, mostly with virusses included on my postfix mail server. I downloaded and installed spamassassin and amavis with Clam antivirus, but I don't know how to configure. The manual on the site of spamassassin is for version 2.5 and higher, but I'm u

Re: small spamassassin configuration question

or /etc/mail/spamassassin -- Arthur H. Johnson II Senior Systems Engineer The Linux Box 206 S. Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 pgr. 734-882-0323 cel. 810-610-9583 txt. [EMAIL PROTECTED] aim. bytor4232 irc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 24 Feb 2

Re: small spamassassin configuration question

the systemwide file. and here is what man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf has to say: Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf - SpamAssassin configuration file These settings differ from the ones above, in that they are considered 'privileged'. Only users running "spamas­ sassin&quo

Re: small spamassassin configuration question

> "Sandip" == Sandip P Deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sandip> hello all could someone tell me whats the location of systemwide Sandip> configuration file for spamassassin (spamd)? Sandip> per user configuration file is ~/.spamassassin/user-prefs. but Sandip> unless i allow per user pref

small spamassassin configuration question

hello all could someone tell me whats the location of systemwide configuration file for spamassassin (spamd)? per user configuration file is ~/.spamassassin/user-prefs. but unless i allow per user preferences in the systemwide configuration file, the per user confguration does not come into effec