The DFE-530TX+ works fine for me on cable modem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jaldhar H. Vyas) writes:
> Suddenly it occurred to me that the slowdown I'd started seeing with my
> @home service began occurring right arounf the time I took my LinkSys
> Etherlink II card (uses ne2k-pci driver) out and replac
on Sat, May 05, 2001 at 03:53:16PM -0400, Alan Shutko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The original idea of DOCSIS was that customers would be able to
> > purchase their own modems at the corner electronics store. In many
> > markets the MSO continues
Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The original idea of DOCSIS was that customers would be able to
> purchase their own modems at the corner electronics store. In many
> markets the MSO continues to purchase the modems as they are able to
> get volume discounts and are then dealing wit
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:34:38AM -0700, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This topic is of interest here in Eureka California where PacBell has a
> strangle hold on broadish band. Cox cable is just about to start a beta test
> in the area post the upgrades they performed last year
Hello,
This topic is of interest here in Eureka California where PacBell has a
strangle hold on broadish band. Cox cable is just about to start a beta test
in the area post the upgrades they performed last year. I've learned that the
server is of a proprietary class as opposed to the newer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 4 May 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I like using a proxy too. Heck, I HAVE to run a proxy on my firewall box
> for my internal machines. And I like the idea of keeping external
> aggregate bandwidth down. Hopefully it'll help keep me off t
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:23:31PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:04:57AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:21:12AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > > Suddenly it occurred to me that the slowdown I'd started seeing with my
> > > @home servic
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:21:12AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Suddenly it occurred to me that the slowdown I'd started seeing with my
> @home service began occurring right arounf the time I took my LinkSys
> Etherlink II card (uses ne2k-pci driver) out and replaced it with a D-Link
> DFE-530TX
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:04:57AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:21:12AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > Suddenly it occurred to me that the slowdown I'd started seeing with my
> > @home service began occurring right arounf the time I took my LinkSys
> > Etherlink I
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:21:12AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Suddenly it occurred to me that the slowdown I'd started seeing with my
> @home service began occurring right arounf the time I took my LinkSys
> Etherlink II card (uses ne2k-pci driver) out and replaced it with a D-Link
> DFE-530TX
Suddenly it occurred to me that the slowdown I'd started seeing with my
@home service began occurring right arounf the time I took my LinkSys
Etherlink II card (uses ne2k-pci driver) out and replaced it with a D-Link
DFE-530TX+ (uses rtl8139 driver.) So I put it back in and lo and behold!
my conne
Which sites are slow? I recently read somethign about 2.4 having
compatibility issues with certain routers.
For more info, see this link.
http://eltoday.com/article.php3?ltsn=2001-04-17-001-14-PS
The long and short of it is try:
#echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
and see if it helps. 2.4 im
I have lately had a similar problem with my cable modem connected to
my OpenBSD firewall/gateway. It comes and goes.
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 08:13:41AM -0500, Kidd, Peter wrote:
> can't be normal day with cable modem, 3 minutes later same machine, same
> site, same file, but win98 is a 5 second do
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:38:38PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Kidd, Peter wrote:
>
> > on a dual boot PC, apt-get runs effectively 10-20X slower than win98 ftp's
> > to the same sites, downloading occurs in short spurts followed by long
> > pauses and frequent 'timed outs
can't be normal day with cable modem, 3 minutes later same machine, same
site, same file, but win98 is a 5 second download, compared to tens of
minutes or not at all in linux (now potato with A Bunk's updates, actually
downloaded in win98)
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:02:02AM -0500, Kidd, Peter wrot
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Kidd, Peter wrote:
> on a dual boot PC, apt-get runs effectively 10-20X slower than win98 ftp's
> to the same sites, downloading occurs in short spurts followed by long
> pauses and frequent 'timed outs' - running with Surfboard 4100 to @home - is
> it because I have a 2.4.1 k
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:02:02AM -0500, Kidd, Peter wrote:
> on a dual boot PC, apt-get runs effectively 10-20X slower than win98 ftp's
> to the same sites, downloading occurs in short spurts followed by long
> pauses and frequent 'timed outs' - running with Surfboard 4100 to @home - is
> it beca
on a dual boot PC, apt-get runs effectively 10-20X slower than win98 ftp's
to the same sites, downloading occurs in short spurts followed by long
pauses and frequent 'timed outs' - running with Surfboard 4100 to @home - is
it because I have a 2.4.1 kernel running an otherwise slink installation
(wh
18 matches
Mail list logo
