Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-21 Thread Urban Gabor
I would advocate against it. My reasons are: 1. It would be a bad policy to isolate newcommers. How could we persuade others to join the Linux (Debian..) community if we immadieatly throw them into a secondary position. 2. One CAN learn much just scanning the mails. Newcommers too. 3. This 'joi

Re: Re[2]: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-20 Thread Gilbert Laycock
> As for the volume of the list my solution is simple: I archive in > gz files every single post to the list, and I have over a year's > worth of such archives. There's nothing new under the sun and > chances are I am not the first person to ask a question. This is > something simple anyone co

RE: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-20 Thread Matt Kokidko
-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Separate list for newbies A thought for all who are contemplating a special list for newbies. The more eyes that see a question, the better your chances are for a correct solution. Many of the "gurus" that answer your questions do not come to this

Re[2]: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread Bob Bernstein
"David B.Teague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It ISN'T just newbies who have questions, none of us know every bright > corner of Debian, let alone the dark ones. ;) Yes. This question of a newbie list comes up with dismal regularity, and it is no more a good idea now than when first spawned by s

Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread John Foster
A thought for all who are contemplating a special list for newbies. The more eyes that see a question, the better your chances are for a correct solution. Many of the "gurus" that answer your questions do not come to this list to simply help out. I'm sure some do, but many (me included) are looki

Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread John Bagdanoff
I don't mind 2 separate lists. I'll subscribe to both of them for now, as I'm in between learning levels. John KaHa wrote: > > Pollywog wrote: > > > I like to get lots of messages, because I scan through them to see > > if I can learn something. I would be one of the newbies to take > > advant

Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread Kent West
"David B.Teague" wrote: > However, I still don't know where a Debian FAQ may > be found! > > Can one of you provide a pointer or a URL? > > David > David Teague, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Debian GNU/Linux Because software support is free, timely, > useful, technically accurate, and fri

Debian FAQ (was Re: Separate list for newbies)

1999-05-19 Thread David B.Teague
On Wed, 19 May 1999 "David B.Teague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, I still don't know where a Debian FAQ may be found! > Can one of you provide a pointer or a URL? Answering my own question, and noting "How to feel incredibly stupid" == Ask a question that is answered directly on the De

Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread David B.Teague
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Khalid EZZARAOUI wrote: > I was thinking about a solution about this and found that it > could be a good thing to add in the mailing list all 200 > messages an official message in the list that explan what is the > archive list, the LDP , the FAQ and some usefull information.

Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread Khalid EZZARAOUI
I was thinking about a solution about this and found that it could be a good thing to add in the mailing list all 200 messages an official message in the list that explan what is the archive list, the LDP , the FAQ and some usefull information. (and of course where to find them) this mail must b

Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread David B.Teague
Hi: I have one question: While "The Fine Manuals" in man *, info *, /usr/doc/*/README* and /usr/doc/HOWTO* are gold mines, if there IS a FAQ for newbies, I have not seen it. Please enlighten me. And a remark: I agree with the folk who say not to segregate debian-user by degree of knowledge and

Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread KaHa
Sean wrote: > Not true at all. I have many more questions now that I have a clue > as to what I'm doing than I did when I first started using Linux > and was pretty much clueless about what was going on. > > It's kinda like that saying: The more you know the more you realize > how much you don't

Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread Sean
Not true at all. I have many more questions now that I have a clue as to what I'm doing than I did when I first started using Linux and was pretty much clueless about what was going on. It's kinda like that saying: The more you know the more you realize how much you don't know. Sean Pollywog

Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread Pollywog
On 19-May-99 Sean wrote: > The problem is how do you know when you've ceased to be a newbie. I think that I will know I am no longer a newbie when I answer more questions than I ask :) -- Andrew

Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread Sean
The problem is how do you know when you've ceased to be a newbie. I think the Debian folks are some of the friendliest to newbies, and as a result I think they (the Debian folks) tend to have the best mailing-lists & newsgroups. Newbie lists/newgroups seem (to me at least) to be not much more th

Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread KaHa
Pollywog wrote: > I like to get lots of messages, because I scan through them to see > if I can learn something. I would be one of the newbies to take > advantage of a newbie list. :) But most newbie questions tend to be covered in the FAQs or through a perusal/search of the debian-user archive

RE: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-19 Thread Pollywog
On 19-May-99 Wim Kerkhoff wrote: > Well, it is kinda pointless to have a 'newbie' list, because how many of > the more 'advanced' users would subscribe to it? Not many, and the > newbies would be left to help each other. If you don't like all the > messages coming through, unsubscribe or just re

RE: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-18 Thread Pollywog
On 18-May-99 Mein Name wrote: > How about a separate list for those of us (like me) who are having problems > setting up debian with the stable elements? There are just so many e-mails > coming in that I often have to remove them without reading them and I'm sure > I lose a few that would be valu

Re: Separate list for newbies

1999-05-18 Thread jean-Yves BARBIER
> Mein Name wrote: > > How about a separate list for those of us (like me) who are having problems > setting up debian with the stable elements? There are just so many e-mails > coming in that I often have to remove them without reading them and I'm sure I > lose a few that would be valuable. I

Separate list for newbies

1999-05-18 Thread Mein Name
How about a separate list for those of us (like me) who are having problems setting up debian with the stable elements?  There are just so many e-mails coming in that I often have to remove them without reading them and I'm sure I lose a few that would be valuable.  I must say that I'm not