Hi, Matus:
On Thursday 17 September 2009 17:46:56 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On Monday 20 July 2009 17:09:57 Soren Orel wrote:
> > > So is Debian Squeeze not up-to-date by security fixes? wow. :S:S
>
> On 21.07.09 03:39, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> > Why should it? It's "testing", after all:
> On Monday 20 July 2009 17:09:57 Soren Orel wrote:
> > So is Debian Squeeze not up-to-date by security fixes? wow. :S:S
On 21.07.09 03:39, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> Why should it? It's "testing", after all: too much work for too short a
> benefit.
because some time ago security support was pro
Hi:
On Monday 20 July 2009 17:09:57 Soren Orel wrote:
> So is Debian Squeeze not up-to-date by security fixes? wow. :S:S
Why should it? It's "testing", after all: too much work for too short a
benefit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
So is Debian Squeeze not up-to-date by security fixes? wow. :S:S
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Soren Orel wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianSqueeze
> Is it still actual?
> thank you
>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 16:11 +0200, Soren Orel wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianSqueeze
> Is it still actual?
I wondered about that as well and was told on #debian-security (OFTC)
yesterday that security support for squeeze is still suspended. I am not sure
about the reasons for that though
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianSqueeze
Is it still actual?
thank you
6 matches
Mail list logo