gt;
>>>> Joey L wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi..i am getting the same issue on ibm 3650 - did you get any answers
>>>>> or found solution ?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> mj
>>>>>
>>>>> On
server with a second Opteron CPU. When we tried
to boot the system with the SMP kernel it gave the following messages
just after the login prompt and hung:
Nov 9 09:52:58 myhost kernel: aacraid: Host adapter reset request. SCSI
hang ?
Nov 9 09:52:58 myhost kernel: aacraid: Host adapter reset request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> I've seen this once before on an overheating Opteron system. A rethink
> of the cooling strategy fixed it.
thanks for a hint. this also came to my mind, since the machine was
really under constant load (scientific calculation) for very long tim
Lubos Vrbka wrote:
thanks for any hints. with best regards,
I've seen this once before on an overheating Opteron system. A rethink
of the cooling strategy fixed it.
--
Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodymx.net/ | Anti-spam & anti-virus
Consultant| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi guys,
today, my smp machine (amd64 dual dualcore opteron) crashed with the
following error
Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed May 3 18:44:22 2006 ...
localhost kernel: invalid operand: [1] SMP
i had 2 crashes today, hoever i didn't
I have a dual processor system running sarge with an SMP kernel. It cannot
find my modem.
When I run the system with a uniprocessor kernel, the modem works fine.
The SMP kernel I am using is 2.6.8-2-686-smp.
What I would like to know is: does this mean I need to compile a kernel with
I suspect, if you're running Sid, that you've run into a fairly commonissue of /tmp/.ICE-unix file not belonging to root. "chmod -R
root.root/tmp/.ICE-unix" should fix this is this is the problem.I looked at the files in that folder and the folder itself. They all belong to root.
If KDM is runnin
Kent West wrote:
>There are sights ...
>
D'oh! "sites".
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David R. Litwin wrote:
>
> AFAIK
>
>
> What does that mean?
As Far As I Know.
There are sights that list the common acronyms. I don't have a link, but
if you're interested, you can just google for it.
BTW, "btw" is a TLA, just FYI.
(Sorry.)
> There is another problem, though. KDE does not
AFAIKWhat does that mean? Nonetheless, thank you for that information. It's nice to know that it won't break in the cold.
I've actually solved the mystery. It was the programme Azureus. My computer is very allergic to it. It froze every time. At least that is solved.There is another problem, though
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, David R. Litwin wrote:
> I have an interesting update. I normally use my laptop in my room, which I
> like to keep between 11 and 15 degrees centigrade. However, in the kitchen,
No current consumer computer hardware will fail to work on that temperature
range, unless it is def
I have an interesting update. I normally use my laptop in my room, which I like to keep between 11 and 15 degrees centigrade. However, in the kitchen, where I am currently, it is around 22 degrees centigrade. After three or so hours of usage, it has yet to freeze.
Could it be that the temperature i
Are you using ATI or nVidia proprietary kernel modules? If so, get rid ofthem and see if the crash goes away. If it does, you know where to direct
your complains.If you are rederening to what is currently in my kernel, I am using the standard linux-image from the Debian repository and, subsequent
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005, David R. Litwin wrote:
> I have a multithreading processor. After doing more research, I finaly
> figured out that the smp is the kernel for me.
Only if it runs whatever you like to do with your computer faster than a
non-SMP kernel. SMT (multithreading) is not always
I haven't had the pleasure of running an smp kernel. Those are for Symmetricmulti processing if I'm not mistaken, and you need two processors or maybe a
dual core cpu.I have a multithreading processor. After doing more research, I finaly figured out that the smp is the kernel for me.So
port position the the more exoticfacitilies of the recent chips is. Is this a hyperthreading chip or
multicore?Hyperthreading. It's a Pentium four. I did much research and it seems that the P4 is quite capable of running an smp. In fact, I recently tried to use the non smp kernel I still have. It did freez
On Sun November 6 2005 06:30 pm, David R. Litwin wrote:
> I have a Pentium Four processor with 3.06GHz speed. As far as I can tell,
> this means that I am eligible to use a 686-smp kernel. Though in comparison
> to the non smp kernel it seems to be much faster, an odd thing is also
&g
On 06/11/05, David R. Litwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a Pentium Four processor with 3.06GHz speed. As far as I can tell, this means that I am eligible to use a 686-smp kernel. Though in comparison to the non smp kernel it seems to be much faster, an odd thing is also happening which
I have a Pentium Four processor with 3.06GHz speed. As far as I can tell, this means that I am eligible to use a 686-smp kernel. Though in comparison to the non smp kernel it seems to be much faster, an odd thing is also happening which I can only attribute to the smp (since I have not really seen
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, michael wrote:
> > user interface, and did not explain what I wanted to know (WTF are those
> > "hi" and "si" CPU statistics).
>
> May I redeem myself by pointing out they are h/w and s/w interrupts, resp
Thanks.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One d
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Clive Menzies wrote:
>> On (27/09/05 08:10), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > > Dick Davies wrote:
>> > > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top
>> doesn't
>> > > > see them for some reason).
>> > >
>>
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (27/09/05 08:10), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > > > see them for some reason).
> > >
> > > Have y
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, michael wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 13:19 +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
> > On 27/09/05, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:10 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > > > Dick Davies wrote:
> >
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, michael wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:10 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > > > see them for some reason).
>
> cpuinf
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > > see them for some reason).
> >
> > Have you ever run a top that lists individual processors on a 64
> > processor machine? I have and top
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 13:19 +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
> On 27/09/05, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:10 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo t
On 27/09/05, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:10 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > > > see them for some reason).
On (27/09/05 08:10), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > > see them for some reason).
> >
> > Have you ever run a top that lists individual processors on a
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:10 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > > see them for some reason).
cpuinfo will tell you about the logical CPUs; top will t
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Dick Davies wrote:
> > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > see them for some reason).
>
> Have you ever run a top that lists individual processors on a 64
> processor machine? I have and top is quite useless there with
Dick Davies wrote:
> Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> see them for some reason).
Have you ever run a top that lists individual processors on a 64
processor machine? I have and top is quite useless there with
all of the screen being taken up by the cpu listing
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, michael wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 14:01 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, James He wrote:
> > > Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
> > > regular kernel?
> >
> > I
James He wrote:
Hi Marco,
I didn't notice it that there is no "ht" sign in the flags info below
until you pointed it out. I'm sorry. But I do have another machine with
one hyper-threading CPU, so never mind.
Hi James,
no problem! If you own a PIV CPU with HT you should use, for example,
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 14:01 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, James He wrote:
> > Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
> > regular kernel?
>
> It depends:
> - If it is a 2.4 kernel, don't bother. Us
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, James He wrote:
> Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
> regular kernel?
It depends:
- If it is a 2.4 kernel, don't bother. Use an UP kernel.
- If it is a recent 2.6 kernel, it depends on the workload. Try it,
and do some m
Hi Marco,
I didn't notice it that there is no "ht" sign in the flags info below
until you pointed it out. I'm sorry. But I do have another machine with
one hyper-threading CPU, so never mind.
Thanks for all. :-)
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 apic sep mtrr p
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:37 +0100, michael wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:03 +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
> > On 25 Sep 2005 23:23:48 -0700, James He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
> >
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:03 +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
> On 25 Sep 2005 23:23:48 -0700, James He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
> > regular kernel?
>
> Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo
James He wrote:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.60GHz
stepping: 8
cpu MHz : 1600.096
cache size : 2048 KB
Hi James,
your CPU does not
On 25 Sep 2005 23:23:48 -0700, James He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
> regular kernel?
Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
see them for
some reason).
--
Rasputin :: Jack of Al
Hi,
Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
regular kernel?
I know it's a dumb question. Please do help me. Thanks a lot! :-)
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : In
On Monday 11 July 2005 03:47 pm, Angelo R. Rossi wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/distrib/ packages
Sorry,
There shouldn't any spaces in the URL.
--
Greg Madden
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Greg Madden:
Thanks for your response. But the link
'http://www.debian.org/distrib/ packages' does not exist. I'll try to
go down to this link another way.
Kind regards,
Angelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Dear Greg Madden:
Thanks for your response. But the link
'http://www.debian.org/distrib/ packages' does not exist. I'll try to
go down to this link another way.
Kind regards,
Angelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Hello:
Can someone provide me with information regarding the debian unstable
smp kernel?
Regards,
A. R. Rossi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 11 July 2005 05:04 am, Angelo R. Rossi wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I want to run debian unstable on a dual-processor xeon system. Can
> someone please point me to information on the appropriate smp kernel
> as well as other information I should know, if I use debian unst
Hello:
I want to run debian unstable on a dual-processor xeon system. Can
someone please point me to information on the appropriate smp kernel as
well as other information I should know, if I use debian unstable for
this?
Thank you so much for your help.
Regards,
A. R. Rossi
--
To
; fpu : yes
> > fpu_exception : yes
> > cpuid level : 5
> > wp : yes
> > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> > mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe pni
> > monitor ds_cpl cidb
> fpu : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level : 5
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe pni
> monitor ds_cpl cidbogomips: 6
can't get an smp kernel to boot - it hangs on
'acpi'
# uname -a
Linux Venus 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Nov 25 04:34:30 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 3
model name : Intel(R) P
At this point I have a 2.6.9-smp kernel. The scsi card is only
detected if the scanner is turned on, so if it's off when
booting, run
# /sbin/rescan-scsi-bus.sh
and you're in business.
Beyond that, all it took was "aha152x" in /etc/modules. daveA
--
To UNSUBSCR
> On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 16:53, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >However, for one simple test (v.low memory, v.low comms, high compute)
>> >case which is Fortran90 compiled using mpich, I actually found turning
>> >HT off hel
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 16:53, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >However, for one simple test (v.low memory, v.low comms, high compute)
> >case which is Fortran90 compiled using mpich, I actually found turning
> >HT off helped --
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>However, for one simple test (v.low memory, v.low comms, high compute)
>case which is Fortran90 compiled using mpich, I actually found turning
>HT off helped -- when it was on then for -np 2 there was no speed up
>(top implied the
gt; > > Hi - I've had a quick look on the WWW but can't find much of help. I've
> > > > a dual Xeon box running testing and kernel from backports:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
> > > > Linux r 2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 0
#x27;ve
> > > a dual Xeon box running testing and kernel from backports:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
> > > Linux r 2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 06:34:36 UTC 2004 i686
> > > GNU/Linux
> > >
> > > The SMP kernel does i
OTECTED]:~$ uname -a
> > Linux r 2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 06:34:36 UTC 2004 i686
> > GNU/Linux
> >
> > The SMP kernel does indeed make use of the processors available: 2 if
> > hyperthreading (HT) is off and 4 if it is on.
> >
> > My quest
ep 3 06:34:36 UTC 2004 i686
> GNU/Linux
>
> The SMP kernel does indeed make use of the processors available: 2 if
> hyperthreading (HT) is off and 4 if it is on.
>
> My questions are:
> a) for MPI codes (mpich v1.2.6 compiled with Intel 8.1 compilers), under
> which circ
Hi - I've had a quick look on the WWW but can't find much of help. I've
a dual Xeon box running testing and kernel from backports:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux r 2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 06:34:36 UTC 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
The SMP kernel does
On Friday 12 November 2004 12:21 pm, Greg Madden wrote:
> On Friday 12 November 2004 07:26 am, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > I used the sarge debian-installer to install with a 2.6 kernel. My
> > My ISA adaptec scsi2 card was not found, of course, but I can't find
> > any adaptec drivers in the
On Friday 12 November 2004 07:26 am, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> I used the sarge debian-installer to install with a 2.6 kernel. My
> My ISA adaptec scsi2 card was not found, of course, but I can't find
> any adaptec drivers in the distribution, my superdisk is recognized
> twice, and my ISA cdr
I used the sarge debian-installer to install with a 2.6 kernel. My
My ISA adaptec scsi2 card was not found, of course, but I can't find
any adaptec drivers in the distribution, my superdisk is recognized
twice, and my ISA cdrom r/w at hdd doesn't have any scsi emulation
for writing. What happened
SMP is for multiprocessor systems ,
non-SMP is for 1 processor..
thats it. :)
cheers,
http://www.axeltabs.com/
__
axel
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
cwinl wrote:
Thank you !!!
it works!
i mistake debian for redhat.
Thank you all!
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: what's the diff between non-SMP and SMP kernel
Thank you !!!
it works!
i mistake debian for redhat.
Thank you all!
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: what's the diff between non-SMP and SMP kernel?
>
On Sunday 16 May 2004 12:17 am, cwinl wrote:
> but i my DELL PE1750 has two P4 Xeon CPU supporting HT tech.
> With SMP-kernel it should find 4 CPUs.but it's only one CPU in
> command top 's message. i had send a post in the maillist just now
>
i want to compile a kernel supporting SMP based on kernel-2.4.25.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "debian- -user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: what's the di
but i my DELL PE1750 has two P4 Xeon CPU supporting HT tech. With SMP-kernel it
should find 4 CPUs.but it's only one CPU in command top 's message.
i had send a post in the maillist just now with message detail.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nel-image-2.4.25-1 and
> kernel-image-2.4.25-1-smp in the result of command 'apt-get install
> kernel-image-2.4.25' .
> I think that the original source package of kernel-2.4.25 must be the same,but i
> don't know what's the different,and how to compile a SMP kerne
n't
know what's the different,and how to compile a SMP kernel deb package.
Thanks.
--
P4/2.4B
ELSA 528/128
512MB DDR333
240GB
MSI 845PE
BenQ FP557s
Pioneer DVD-120A
LG GCE-8320B
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004, Sarunas Burdulis wrote:
> 1. When compilig a kernel (2.4.25) what is the proper CPU architecture
> setting for Intel Xeon CPU?
P4 if it is not an extremely old Xeon, P3 otherwise.
> 2. Are there tests/demos to check the SMP system and to see the two CPUs
> (in my case) actual
Hello,
1. When compilig a kernel (2.4.25) what is the proper CPU architecture
setting for Intel Xeon CPU?
2. Are there tests/demos to check the SMP system and to see the two CPUs
(in my case) actually at work?
Thanks,
Sarunas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Hello
Robert Cates (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I would like to install Debian 3.0 (Stable) on my dual CPU Pentium 3
> system, with an SMP kernel of course. My understanding is I would
> have to first install using a non-SMP kernel, and then compile a new
> kernel with SMP
On (28/01/04 08:39), Robert Cates wrote:
> I would like to install Debian 3.0 (Stable) on my dual CPU Pentium 3 system, with an
> SMP kernel of course. My understanding is I would have to first install using a
> non-SMP kernel, and then compile a new kernel with SMP support. Could I
Hi,
I would like to install Debian 3.0
(Stable) on my dual CPU Pentium 3 system, with an SMP kernel of
course. My understanding is I would have to first install using a non-SMP
kernel, and then compile a new kernel with SMP support. Could I not just
do it this way - after installation
gy doesn't make you less stupid; it just makes you stupid faster."
Jerry Gregoire - Former CIO at Dell
-Original Message-
From: Manoj Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 6:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel - Running
>>"Barry" == deFreese, Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Barry> I tried to use make-kpkg but it kept failing
Could you offer a few details? Perhaps file a bug against
kernel-package about what failed?
manoj
--
I have a VISION! It's a RANCID double-FISHWICH on an ENRICHED BU
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 at 3:15pm, nate wrote:
:deFreese, Barry said:
:> nate,
:>
:> Thanks for the reply. That's whats odd. (Remember I'm a total newbie
:> here) I pulled the kernel building HOWTO off of the Debian site but most
:> of the references were to RedHat so I'm a little confused. I tried
deFreese, Barry said:
> nate,
>
> Thanks for the reply. That's whats odd. (Remember I'm a total newbie
> here) I pulled the kernel building HOWTO off of the Debian site but most
> of the references were to RedHat so I'm a little confused. I tried to use
> make-kpkg but it kept failing so I did j
riday, November 22, 2002 2:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel - Running but have a question
deFreese, Barry said:
> O.K. I compiled a new kernel with 2.4.18 SMP and I can now see both
> processors under /proc/cpuinfo and I was able to build in the Compaq array
> dr
deFreese, Barry said:
> O.K. I compiled a new kernel with 2.4.18 SMP and I can now see both
> processors under /proc/cpuinfo and I was able to build in the Compaq array
> drivers. It is kicking butt.
>
> The question that I now have is that it appears to have re-configured and
> re-run LILO for me
IO at Dell
On 22 Nov 2002, 09:17:49, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> O.K., so I got the Proliant 1600 up and running with Potato. Did a dist
> upgrade to Woody and yesterday I realized that I don't have the SMP kernel
> installed. I have pulled down the kernel-header-2.4.18-686-SMP and t
deFreese, Barry said:
> To the Gods of Debian,
>
> O.K., so I got the Proliant 1600 up and running with Potato. Did a dist
> upgrade to Woody and yesterday I realized that I don't have the SMP kernel
> installed. I have pulled down the kernel-header-2.4.18-686-SMP and the
&g
On 22 Nov 2002, 09:17:49, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> O.K., so I got the Proliant 1600 up and running with Potato. Did a dist
> upgrade to Woody and yesterday I realized that I don't have the SMP kernel
> installed. I have pulled down the kernel-header-2.4.18-686-SMP and the
> ker
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> To the Gods of Debian,
>
> O.K., so I got the Proliant 1600 up and running with Potato. Did a dist
> upgrade to Woody and yesterday I realized that I don't have the SMP kernel
> installed. I have pulled down the kernel-header-2.
To the Gods of Debian,
O.K., so I got the Proliant 1600 up and running with Potato. Did a dist
upgrade to Woody and yesterday I realized that I don't have the SMP kernel
installed. I have pulled down the kernel-header-2.4.18-686-SMP and the
kernel-source-2.4.18 and am getting ready to bui
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 00:49 -0900, W.D.McKinney wrote:
> Thanks Nate.
> Does Debian package the whole kernel, headers , etc. like this ?
> Been running SuSE for a long time and I'm moving to Debian.
> Hope these questions are not bugging you :-)
The headers are in package 'kernel-headers'. kern
06/11/2002 09:24:04, "W.D.McKinney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a dual PIII server I need to get both processors working.
compile a kernel with SMP enabled
hugh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02 10:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Upgrading to a SMP kernel ?
W.D.McKinney said:
> I have a dual PIII server I need to get both processors working.
> I am installing Woody now, and wondering how to upgrade to a SMP
> kernel when I'm done here ? I am not an expert at al
W.D.McKinney said:
> I have a dual PIII server I need to get both processors working.
> I am installing Woody now, and wondering how to upgrade to a SMP
> kernel when I'm done here ? I am not an expert at all with Debian
> but it seems there are good tools to use with .deb
I have a dual PIII server I need to get both processors working.
I am installing Woody now, and wondering how to upgrade to a SMP
kernel when I'm done here ? I am not an expert at all with Debian
but it seems there are good tools to use with .deb .
Thanks !
Dee
W.D.McKinney (Dee)
A
If you're using make-kpkg, I think you'll have to set CONCURRENCY_LEVEL.
The option is documented in the kernel-pkg.conf man page.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 05:13:19AM +0300, Egor Tur wrote:
> grep MAKE conf.vars
> MAKE = /usr/bin/make -j3
>
> time make-kpkg --revision=pupkin.0.6
Hi.
$ uname -a
Linux pupkin 2.4.19 #1 SMP Mon Sep 16 08:45:01 EEST 2002 i686 unknown
I have 2 processors, 256 memory, 256 swap
cd /usr/src/linux
see Documentation/smp.txt;
grep MAKE conf.vars
MAKE = /usr/bin/make -j3
time make-kpkg --revision=pupkin.0.6 kernel_image
> > reveals:
> >
> > % apt-cache search kernel-image | grep -i smp
> > kernel-image-2.4.16-686-smp - Linux kernel image 2.4.16 on
> > PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII SMP. kernel-image-2.4.17-686-smp - Linux kernel
> > image 2.4.17 on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII SMP.
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 04 February 2002 03:36 pm, Nick Hastings wrote:
> Hi,
>
>not sure what's available in potato but a quick check on a sid box
> reveals:
>
> % apt-cache search kernel-image | grep -i smp
> kernel-image-2.4.16-68
On Monday 04 February 2002 18:36 pm, Nick Hastings wrote:
> So if I wanted to install an off the shelf SMP kernel I'd do
>
> % sudo apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.17-686-smp
Thanks, Nick. Just the answer I was looking for.
--
Michael MerrittO2/CO2 Convers
Hi,
not sure what's available in potato but a quick check on a sid box reveals:
% apt-cache search kernel-image | grep -i smp
kernel-image-2.4.16-686-smp - Linux kernel image 2.4.16 on
PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII SMP.
kernel-image-2.4.17-686-smp - Linux kernel image 2.4.17 on
PPro/Ce
it is
now SMP. Is there a way to drop in an SMP kernel (preferably 2.4.17) without
building my own from scratch?
I'm not against building my own kernel, but if there's a simple way to update
using apt-get or whatever, I'd like to learn about it.
I've used Linux for nearly
Hi all, (Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED], i'm currently off the list)
My current system :
Tyan TomcatIII Duel Board (S1563D)
Pentium Class 430 HX
2 Pentium 200 Non-MMX processors
64 mgs ram (mixed 70s/60s unfortunatly)
120 mgs swap partition
th some I/O
> > intensive application there are deadlocks, would a kernel compiled with no
> > SMP run on that motherboard?
>
> Yes. In that case you just have an idle CPU.
On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Benedikt Eric Heinen wrote:
> Yes, no problem with that. I still have the old Debian
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
