On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 15:21 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:30:57PM +0200, Robert Cates wrote:
> > michael wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> just a general question - I'm interested in getting a moth
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:17:21PM -0400, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > how about 16x more parallel? at least to the extent that your workload
> > is able to parallelize (is that a word?). IOW, if you have lots of
>
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> how about 16x more parallel? at least to the extent that your workload
> is able to parallelize (is that a word?). IOW, if you have lots of
^^
No!, it is yet another American
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Robert Cates wrote:
Ok, but 16x better? Or 16x more efficient? I know that if we're talking
about a 2GHz quad core CPU we're not getting 8GHz of speed, but what exactly
is the (performance) advantage of SMP?
Not much, unless you can write software that can take advant
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:30:57PM +0200, Robert Cates wrote:
> michael wrote:
>> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that
>>> supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effe
michael wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates wrote:
Hi all,
just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that
supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
El vie, 12-10-2007 a las 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that
> supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
> CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
> SM
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that
> supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
> CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
> SMP ker
Hi all,
just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that
supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of
c
[please wrap your lines at something sensible, it makes your mail much
easier to read]
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 02:50:27PM -0500, David Ellis wrote:
> This make of machine uses the old C-BUS II architecture. Unfortunately
> the SMP Support doesn't appear to exist for this method of SMP (it's
> not
I've got an old IBM PC Server 720 with 3 Pentium
166 chips. I've successfully installed Debian 3.0 (woody), and have been very
happy with the performance and functionality.
The only challenge is I needed to recompile the
2.18 kernel to use PCI Bios access instead of Direct access.
This ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
