On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 05:18:24PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> Um. I feel stupid asking this, but what resource limits *do* work, and
per user process limits work (though pam_limits and/or ssh is broken
in that you must set it higher then the number of root owned processes
for logins to wo
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 17:18:24 -0800
"Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> Um. I feel stupid asking this, but what resource limits *do* work, and
> how can user resource limits be imposed at the system level? I've been
> looking at the bash man pages -- there's no more specific resource
> utilization interf
on Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 03:41:22PM -0900, Ethan Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 07:35:47PM -0500, Martin Weinberg wrote:
> > Thanks very much for the info! Good to know. I've been assuming that
> > this has been working for years. I do have a vague recollection that
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 07:35:47PM -0500, Martin Weinberg wrote:
> Thanks very much for the info! Good to know. I've been assuming that
> this has been working for years. I do have a vague recollection that
> "memoryuse" has worked in the past under Linux, no?
i don't know
> Do you, by any cha
Ethan Benson wrote on Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:32:44 -0900
>> I have set a hard limit on memoryuse to 1 (10M). limits (or
>> ulimit -a) shows the limit but, it doesn't seem to be working.
>> For example, with the limit set the following bit of code
>
>[sniped code]
>
>> compiled as follows:
>>
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 04:29:38PM -0500, Martin Weinberg wrote:
>
> I have set a hard limit on memoryuse to 1 (10M). limits (or
> ulimit -a) shows the limit but, it doesn't seem to be working.
> For example, with the limit set the following bit of code
>
> ==
I have set a hard limit on memoryuse to 1 (10M). limits (or
ulimit -a) shows the limit but, it doesn't seem to be working.
For example, with the limit set the following bit of code
/* Name: tst.c */
#include
#include
#include
#
7 matches
Mail list logo
