On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 22:00:39 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 31 oct 19, 11:55:01, The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> > (IMO the correct behavior should be chosen automatically by
> > "reply", and there should be separate "reply to sender", "reply to
> > all", and "reply to list" options in the client
On Jo, 31 oct 19, 11:55:01, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> (IMO the correct behavior should be chosen automatically by "reply", and
> there should be separate "reply to sender", "reply to all", and "reply
> to list" options in the client. I don't know of anything which
> implements that, however.)
I see
Gene Heskett (12019-10-31):
> And this is something that the kmail of yore, now forked to TDE, makes
> simple. If you sort incoming mail to list yy in its own folder, then it
> is sufficient to name that list in the folder definitions. I've been
> doing that for so long I'd consider any email a
On Thursday 31 October 2019 12:10:01 Nicolas George wrote:
> The Wanderer (12019-10-31):
> > IMO, the correct behavior should indeed be the same for lists as for
> > private mail: reply to the source from which you received the
> > message.
>
> ... and everybody who got it too.
>
> For example, if
Andrew McGlashan (12019-11-01):
> Do you also have "ignore list-post:" in your muttrc ?
Of course not. What a strange question: the ignore directive is for
display, not for controlling the recipients.
In case you confused it with ignore_list_reply_to, look at the comment
on its side: "Press L for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/11/19 3:10 am, Nicolas George wrote:
> Possible with Mutt:
>
> send-hook . "unmy_hdr Reply-To:" send-hook
> ~cdebian-u...@lists.debian.org my_hdr "Reply-To:
> debian-user@lists.debian.org"
Do you also have "ignore list-post:" in your muttrc
The Wanderer (12019-10-31):
> IMO, the correct behavior should indeed be the same for lists as for
> private mail: reply to the source from which you received the message.
... and everybody who got it too.
For example, if I reply to:
# From: Colleague
# To: Me
# Cc: Boss
it should be:
# From:
On 2019-10-31 at 11:36, Nicolas George wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan (12019-11-01):
>
>> btw doesn't "reply list" work for you? I get all list messages
>> okay.
>
> If you do not want to be on copy, use the standard reply-to header
> to specify it, just like me. Senders should not be expected to do
8 matches
Mail list logo
