On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 05:17:57PM +, David Pottage wrote:
> On 2021-03-24 12:37, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:26:49AM +, David Pottage wrote:
> > > Is there a way to assemble the VG and mount those ext4 filesystems in
> > > such a way that read attempts from the
On 2021-03-24 12:37, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:26:49AM +, David Pottage wrote:
Is there a way to assemble the VG and mount those ext4 filesystems in
such a way that read attempts from the missing PV will return zeros,
but the rest of the filesystem will work?
Try this:
v
Dan Ritter wrote:
...
> Next time: verify that you are backing up everything that you
> need to backup. I know it's boring.
it seems like it should be common sense for anyone worried
about redundancy to the extent of having raid to also think
about making sure there is more than one controller/d
David Pottage wrote:
> At work, there is a fileserver with a failed external drive enclosure. I am
> attempting to recover some data that is probably not on the failed drives.
>
> This file server started out with 36 internal drives (in three RAID-6
> arrays) that formed the initial 3 physical vo
Hi.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:26:49AM +, David Pottage wrote:
> Is there a way to assemble the VG and mount those ext4 filesystems in
> such a way that read attempts from the missing PV will return zeros,
> but the rest of the filesystem will work?
Try this:
vgchange --activationmod
Hello,
At work, there is a fileserver with a failed external drive enclosure. I
am attempting to recover some data that is probably not on the failed
drives.
This file server started out with 36 internal drives (in three RAID-6
arrays) that formed the initial 3 physical volumes to an LVM vol
6 matches
Mail list logo
