On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:03:02AM -0400, Bill Marcum wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 12:34:02PM -0400, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 23:59, cr wrote:
> > > On Friday 27 June 2003 11:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > LABOR TRUE SOLUTIONS WITH RESOLVE TOMORROW METABOLIC MIXTURE
On Thursday 03 July 2003 02:03, Bill Marcum wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 12:34:02PM -0400, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 23:59, cr wrote:
> > > On Friday 27 June 2003 11:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > LABOR TRUE SOLUTIONS WITH RESOLVE TOMORROW METABOLIC MIXTURE
> > > > TH
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 12:34:02PM -0400, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 23:59, cr wrote:
> > On Friday 27 June 2003 11:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > LABOR TRUE SOLUTIONS WITH RESOLVE TOMORROW METABOLIC MIXTURE
> > > THE TRADE WITH PEACE IS NOT CONSUMPTION CONTROVERSIAL DEALINGS
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 12:34:02PM -0400, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 23:59, cr wrote:
> > On Friday 27 June 2003 11:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > LABOR TRUE SOLUTIONS WITH RESOLVE TOMORROW METABOLIC MIXTURE
> > > THE TRADE WITH PEACE IS NOT CONSUMPTION CONTROVERSIAL DEALINGS
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 03:59:36PM +1200, cr wrote:
> On Friday 27 June 2003 11:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > LABOR TRUE SOLUTIONS WITH RESOLVE TOMORROW METABOLIC MIXTURE
> > THE TRADE WITH PEACE IS NOT CONSUMPTION CONTROVERSIAL DEALINGS
> > Datum technocratic fellowship, where concerning house
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 09:40:14 +0200, cr wrote:
> ... and so it goes on, for about 70K (well, that's what Kmail says) of
> incomprehensible gobbledygook.
>
> OK, so it's spam.What baffles me is how someone managed to produce such a
> volume of verbiage that appears to have some vaguely gramma
On Friday 27 June 2003 11:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> LABOR TRUE SOLUTIONS WITH RESOLVE TOMORROW METABOLIC MIXTURE
> THE TRADE WITH PEACE IS NOT CONSUMPTION CONTROVERSIAL DEALINGS
> Datum technocratic fellowship, where concerning house of space abundant
> truth may
... and so it goes on, for ab
WSHIP
UPHOLDS IEEP MOTION, WE AS THE WORLD AT ITSELF AND IEEP CASE IN
PURSUIT OF UNITY SOVEREIGN, and finally, Remove With Understanding Due
Work, Power And Nature Of I Associative We ...
Dynamics authentic spirit, keep integration encarnalizing economy out of our flesh
and I associative we with b
8 matches
Mail list logo