Commercial products do not rename their OS every time
> > there's a bug fix! I suggested adopting a more commercial
> > approach to release naming for the reasons it is now being
> > done. I suggested only incrementing the revision number
> > (i.e. issuing a point rele
On Fri, Aug 22, 1997 at 10:46:45PM -0500, Dave Cinege wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 1997 20:42:21 -0400 (EDT), Richard G. Roberto wrote:
>
> >A while ago I posted my feelings on this to Debian private,
> >but it was _very_ ill received at the time. I'll restate it
> >now. Commercial products do not re
e's a bug fix! I suggested adopting a more commercial
> approach to release naming for the reasons it is now being
> done. I suggested only incrementing the revision number
> (i.e. issuing a point release) when one of three criteria
> were met:
The name of a product, and its vers
On Fri, 22 Aug 1997, Dave Cinege wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 1997 20:42:21 -0400 (EDT), Richard G. Roberto wrote:
>
> >A while ago I posted my feelings on this to Debian private,
> >but it was _very_ ill received at the time. I'll restate it
> >now. Commercial products do not rename their OS every
On Fri, 22 Aug 1997 20:42:21 -0400 (EDT), Richard G. Roberto wrote:
>A while ago I posted my feelings on this to Debian private,
>but it was _very_ ill received at the time. I'll restate it
>now. Commercial products do not rename their OS every time
>there's a bug fix!
Then it's settled! Debi
A while ago I posted my feelings on this to Debian private,
but it was _very_ ill received at the time. I'll restate it
now. Commercial products do not rename their OS every time
there's a bug fix! I suggested adopting a more commercial
approach to release naming for the reasons it is
6 matches
Mail list logo
