Re: Regular expressions, PCRE [was: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart]

2025-04-21 Thread debian-user
Nicolas George wrote: > Tom Browder (HE12025-04-21): > > $ time raku -e ‘my $s = “a” x 25; my $r = “a?” x 25 ~ “a” x 25; > > if ($s ~= $r) { say “yes” } ‘ > > I almost asked if Raku uses pairs of Unicode quotes instead of the > symmetrical ASCII one; then I noticed the single quotes, and I

Re: Regular expressions, PCRE [was: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart]

2025-04-21 Thread Dan Ritter
Nicolas George wrote: > Tom Browder (HE12025-04-21): > > $ time raku -e ‘my $s = “a” x 25; my $r = “a?” x 25 ~ “a” x 25; if > > ($s ~= $r) { say “yes” } ‘ > > I almost asked if Raku uses pairs of Unicode quotes instead of the > symmetrical ASCII one; then I noticed the single quotes, and I kn

Re: Regular expressions, PCRE [was: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart]

2025-04-21 Thread Tom Browder
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 09:20 Nicolas George wrote: > > Tom Browder (HE12025-04-21): > > $ time raku -e ‘my $s = “a” x 25; my $r = “a?” x 25 ~ “a” x 25; if > > ($s ~= $r) { say “yes” } ‘ > > I almost asked if Raku uses pairs of Unicode quotes instead of the > symmetrical ASCII one; then I noti

Re: Regular expressions, PCRE [was: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart]

2025-04-21 Thread tomas
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 04:19:43PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Tom Browder (HE12025-04-21): > > $ time raku -e ‘my $s = “a” x 25; my $r = “a?” x 25 ~ “a” x 25; if > > ($s ~= $r) { say “yes” } ‘ > > I almost asked if Raku uses pairs of Unicode quotes instead of the > symmetrical ASCII one; t

Re: Regular expressions, PCRE [was: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart]

2025-04-21 Thread Nicolas George
Tom Browder (HE12025-04-21): > $ time raku -e ‘my $s = “a” x 25; my $r = “a?” x 25 ~ “a” x 25; if > ($s ~= $r) { say “yes” } ‘ I almost asked if Raku uses pairs of Unicode quotes instead of the symmetrical ASCII one; then I noticed the single quotes, and I know the shell does not. > Raku’s re

Re: Regular expressions, PCRE [was: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart]

2025-04-21 Thread Tom Browder
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 06:55 wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 07:34:13AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 08:04:44 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > [...] quite possibly Perl's engine has been refined (it definitely has > > > been extended) since then. > > [...] > > > It

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-21 Thread Richard Owlett
On 4/21/25 7:17 AM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: Em 21/04/2025 08:50, Richard Owlett escreveu: That does *NOT* express *MY* question!!! Then you should have stated your question more clearly. It was evidently clear enough to *YOU* that you could [and *did] explicitly answer my explicit quest

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-21 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
Em 21/04/2025 08:50, Richard Owlett escreveu: That does *NOT* express *MY* question!!! Then you should have stated your question more clearly. Asking a vague a confusing question and then strongly emphasing that what people have gone to the trouble of responding to you is not what you wanted

Re: Regular expressions, PCRE [was: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart]

2025-04-21 Thread tomas
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 07:34:13AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 08:04:44 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > [...] quite possibly Perl's engine has been refined (it definitely has > > been extended) since then. [...] > It still has the issue. > > hobbit:~$ time perl -e '$

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-21 Thread Richard Owlett
On 4/20/25 10:40 AM, David wrote: On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 at 14:17, George at Clug wrote: Sorry, but I do not understand the meaning of your words: "universe of discourse" "entity goals" And I am confused by this sentences: "A significant number of which mention Kate *or* Kwrite *or* Katepart."

Re: Regular expressions, PCRE [was: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart]

2025-04-21 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 08:04:44 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > If you like to disappear in rabbit holes, this [3] one is nice. If > not, still the pic at the beginning still shows impressively an > exponential runaway for Perl's re engine compared to Tcl's which > uses a Thompson algorithm. Note

Regular expressions, PCRE [was: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart]

2025-04-20 Thread tomas
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 12:08:53AM +, David wrote: > On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 at 17:42, wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 05:58:31PM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: > > > > Err, did you notice the bit in that reference that says: "It documents > > > regular expressions in the form availa

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-20 Thread David
On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 at 17:42, wrote: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 05:58:31PM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: > > Err, did you notice the bit in that reference that says: "It documents > > regular expressions in the form available within KatePart, which is not > > compatible with the regular

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-20 Thread tomas
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 05:58:31PM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: > wrote: [...] > > Note that regular expressions come in slightly different flavours. > > Going by Kate's documentation [1] on this topic they seem to be > > PCRE or a variant thereof. > > > > Cheers > > > > [1] > > ht

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-20 Thread debian-user
wrote: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 08:45:58AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > On 4/20/25 7:56 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > I'm restarting a editing project that could take advantage of > > > > using "regular expression

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-20 Thread tomas
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 08:45:58AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 4/20/25 7:56 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > I'm restarting a editing project that could take advantage of using > > > "regular > > > expressions". > > > > >

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-20 Thread David
On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 at 14:17, George at Clug wrote: > Sorry, but I do not understand the meaning of your words: > "universe of discourse" > "entity goals" > And I am confused by this sentences: > "A significant number of which mention Kate *or* Kwrite *or* Katepart." > "In a discussion of "regul

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-20 Thread David
On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 at 13:46, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 4/20/25 7:56 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > I need to understand the entity goals of Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart. > I.E. In a discussion of "regular expressions", does it mat

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-20 Thread George at Clug
On Sunday, 20-04-2025 at 23:45 Richard Owlett wrote: > On 4/20/25 7:56 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > >> I'm restarting a editing project that could take advantage of using > >> "regular > >> expressions". > >> > >> I had stated

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-20 Thread Richard Owlett
On 4/20/25 7:56 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm restarting a editing project that could take advantage of using "regular expressions". I had stated using Kate for the project. I'm reviewing my regular expression related web search

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-20 Thread David Wright
On Sun 20 Apr 2025 at 07:27:12 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm restarting a editing project that could take advantage of using > "regular expressions". > > I had stated using Kate for the project. > > I'm reviewing my regular expression related web searches. It would be > helpful if I could

Re: Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-20 Thread tomas
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm restarting a editing project that could take advantage of using "regular > expressions". > > I had stated using Kate for the project. > > I'm reviewing my regular expression related web searches. It would be > helpful if I coul

Relation(s) between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart

2025-04-20 Thread Richard Owlett
I'm restarting a editing project that could take advantage of using "regular expressions". I had stated using Kate for the project. I'm reviewing my regular expression related web searches. It would be helpful if I could find a _single_ document that made comparison between/among Kate, Kwrite