On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:17:56AM -0400, shawn wilson wrote:
> first, i love statistics - it allows people to say pretty much
> whatever they want and sound honest and scientific about it.
Statistics are like bikinis:
What they unveil
is revealing,
but what they conceal
is pivotal.
wwf
--
.
* On 2012 21 Aug 10:20 -0500, shawn wilson wrote:
> first, i love statistics - it allows people to say pretty much
> whatever they want and sound honest and scientific about it.
Yes, lies, damned lies, and statistics.
> some things could be
> better (making sources.list more like yum.d for instan
first, i love statistics - it allows people to say pretty much
whatever they want and sound honest and scientific about it.
i didn't read up on where those numbers came from, but lets assume
they are correct and honest. what they didn't give is the numbers if
an environment has all redhat boxes vs
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:53:20 -0300, francis picabia wrote:
> Redhat marketing people have a video and PDF docs to conclude based on
> IDC studies that RHEL is cheaper than free Linux in the Enterprise.
It makes sense.
> There is a video on the right side with a summary of their claims.
>
> http
4 matches
Mail list logo
