Hello Stan,
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> As I replied on XFS, there's ZERO reason for putting one partition on a
> dedicated mythTV recording drive. And since this is an Advanced Format
> drive, you instantly misaligned XFS by creating that partition. None of
> the Squeeze partitioning tools understa
On Die, 2012-07-03 at 03:59 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/3/2012 3:16 AM, Ramon Hofer wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:04:04 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Ramon,
> >>
> >> Ramon Hofer wrote:
> >>> /dev/sdi1 jfs1.9T 1.9T 3.9G 100% /mnt/recordings /dev/sdk
> >>>
On 7/3/2012 3:16 AM, Ramon Hofer wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:04:04 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
>
>> Hello Ramon,
>>
>> Ramon Hofer wrote:
>>> /dev/sdi1 jfs1.9T 1.9T 3.9G 100% /mnt/recordings /dev/sdk
>>>xfs1.9T 1.9T 3.3G 100% /mnt/recordings_temp
>>>
>>> Is there a re
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:04:04 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> Hello Ramon,
>
> Ramon Hofer wrote:
>> /dev/sdi1 jfs1.9T 1.9T 3.9G 100% /mnt/recordings /dev/sdk
>>xfs1.9T 1.9T 3.3G 100% /mnt/recordings_temp
>>
>> Is there a reason why one should use a partition spanning the
Hello Ramon,
Ramon Hofer wrote:
> /dev/sdi1 jfs1.9T 1.9T 3.9G 100% /mnt/recordings
> /dev/sdk xfs1.9T 1.9T 3.3G 100% /mnt/recordings_temp
>
> Is there a reason why one should use a partition spanning the whole disk
> instead of creating the filesystem directly on the disk
Hi all
I have accidentally found that it's possible to use a whole disk instead
of a partition spanning a whole disk.
I have two 2 TB disks. One (sdi) has a partition with jfs and the other
(sdk) has xfs directly on the disk:
/dev/sdi1 jfs1.9T 1.9T 3.9G 100% /mnt/recordings
/dev/sdk
6 matches
Mail list logo