Re: Re (2): [OT] Re: An inline bitmap in an HTML file.

2012-08-18 Thread Camaleón
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:48:41 -0800, peasthope wrote: > From: Camaleon > Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:19:25 + (UTC) >> ... really mean you were not aware that there existed the tag for >> displaying images in html? > > Used in many places. In this instance I became so > preoccupied with trans

Re: Re (2): [OT] Re: An inline bitmap in an HTML file.

2012-08-17 Thread Linux-Fan
On 08/17/2012 08:48 PM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > From: Camaleon > Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:19:25 + (UTC) >> ... really mean you were not aware that there existed the >> tag for displaying images in html? > > Used in many places. In this instance > I became so preoccupied with transfor

Re (2): [OT] Re: An inline bitmap in an HTML file.

2012-08-17 Thread peasthope
From: Camaleon Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:19:25 + (UTC) > ... really mean you were not aware that there existed the > tag for displaying images in html? Used in many places. In this instance I became so preoccupied with transforming the example to my case, that didn't cross my mind.