Re: wine broke with libc6_2.1.3-5

2000-03-01 Thread Kent West
Frank Copeland wrote: > John Bagdanoff wrote: > >Frank Copeland wrote: > >> > >> wine breaks for me too. I get a stack dump and backtrace that seems to > >> implicate the libc towupper() function. I've filed a bug against libc6, > >> we'll see what comes of it. > > > >Thanks for the verification,

Re: wine broke with libc6_2.1.3-5

2000-03-01 Thread John Bagdanoff
Yahoo!!, I'm back in business. Thanks John Frank Copeland wrote: > This issue is starting to get a mention on comp.emulators.ms-windows.wine. > The suggested workaround is to set LC_ALL=en before running wine, and I can > confirm that this works for me.

Re: wine broke with libc6_2.1.3-5

2000-03-01 Thread Frank Copeland
John Bagdanoff wrote: >Frank Copeland wrote: >> >> wine breaks for me too. I get a stack dump and backtrace that seems to >> implicate the libc towupper() function. I've filed a bug against libc6, >> we'll see what comes of it. > >Thanks for the verification, Frank. Guess I'll sit tight for a cou

Re: wine broke with libc6_2.1.3-5

2000-03-01 Thread John Bagdanoff
Frank Copeland wrote: > > wine breaks for me too. I get a stack dump and backtrace that seems to > implicate the libc towupper() function. I've filed a bug against libc6, > we'll see what comes of it. > > Frank Thanks for the verification, Frank. Guess I'll sit tight for a couple of days. John

Re: wine broke with libc6_2.1.3-5

2000-03-01 Thread Pollywog
On 01-Mar-2000 Frank Copeland wrote: > John Bagdanoff wrote: >>The current potato wine package worked flawlessly for me, so I didn't >>save the previous version. I got the latest one in woody, but still >>wine breaks. >> >>If you could, polly, upgrade to the latest libc6 (2.1.3-5). If wine >>sta

Re: wine broke with libc6_2.1.3-5

2000-03-01 Thread Frank Copeland
John Bagdanoff wrote: >The current potato wine package worked flawlessly for me, so I didn't >save the previous version. I got the latest one in woody, but still >wine breaks. > >If you could, polly, upgrade to the latest libc6 (2.1.3-5). If wine >starts up for you, then I'll go to the wine news

Re: wine broke with libc6_2.1.3-5

2000-02-29 Thread Pollywog
On 29-Feb-2000 John Bagdanoff wrote: > The current potato wine package worked flawlessly for me, so I didn't > save the previous version. I got the latest one in woody, but still > wine breaks. > > If you could, polly, upgrade to the latest libc6 (2.1.3-5). If wine > starts up for you, then I'l

Re: wine broke with libc6_2.1.3-5

2000-02-29 Thread John Bagdanoff
The current potato wine package worked flawlessly for me, so I didn't save the previous version. I got the latest one in woody, but still wine breaks. If you could, polly, upgrade to the latest libc6 (2.1.3-5). If wine starts up for you, then I'll go to the wine news group to see if they can sor

RE: wine broke with libc6_2.1.3-5

2000-02-28 Thread Pollywog
On 28-Feb-2000 John Bagdanoff wrote: > but when I degraded back to libc6_2.1.3-4, wine works. > > My wine package is: > > wine_0.0.2109-2_i386.deb > > This is on a fresh install of potato I've been running the last month or > so. > > I never had the "pre-depends" problem. > > Any one els