On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 12:54:30PM +, Richard Lyons wrote:
> I second that. I am also wondering about getting a signal in two or
> more hops up a valley about one kilometer in the Appennine alps.
If you have a free line of sight, you could cover several km even with
relatively crude aerials
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:49:51AM +, Dave Howorth wrote:
> Eugen Leitl wrote:
> >This is getting a bit offtopic for the list, perhaps we should take it to
> >private mail.
>
> Please keep it on the list. It's a very interesting thread.
>
I second that. I am also wondering about getting a sig
Eugen Leitl wrote:
This is getting a bit offtopic for the list, perhaps we should take it to
private mail.
Please keep it on the list. It's a very interesting thread.
Cheers, Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 09:52:06AM +0100, Conrad Newton wrote:
> For the moment I am only interested in home use, but just to satisfy
> my curiosity, could you describe an alternate setting where you have
> used a different set of antennae?
I haven't yet modified a Linksys box, only read other pe
>From Eugen Leitl on Wednesday, 2004-12-08 at 16:15:49 +0100:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:04:43PM +0100, Conrad Newton wrote:
>
> > > Linksys WRT54GS and Sveasoft firmware + fwbuilder. Don't diss Linksys:
> > > their
> > > firmware is pure crap, but the hardware (radios) is excellent (you'll nee
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:44:11AM +, Chris Lale wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 00:23, Richard Lyons wrote:
[...]
> >
> > 3com Office Connect ADSL wireless 11g firewall router
> > 3CRWE754G72-A-UK
> >
> > Belkin 54g wireless DSL/Cable gateway router
> > F5D7230UK4
> >
> > D
>From Eugen Leitl on Wednesday, 2004-12-08 at 09:26:41 +0100:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 04:33:36PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > The Netgear is indeed the one you want. I'll just about gauraunteed to
> > be higher quality than Linksys for a couple dozen dollars cheaper.
>
> Linksys WRT54GS a
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:04:43PM +0100, Conrad Newton wrote:
> > Linksys WRT54GS and Sveasoft firmware + fwbuilder. Don't diss Linksys: their
> > firmware is pure crap, but the hardware (radios) is excellent (you'll need
> > better aerials than default ones though).
>
> I just got one of these,
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 00:23, Richard Lyons wrote:
> Apologies if this subject has been overworked lately. There have been
> several threads on wireless lan kit, but I am still hesitating...
>
> There are a number of combined adsl-modem/router/lan-switch boxes
> around. Looking on one well known
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 04:33:36PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> The Netgear is indeed the one you want. I'll just about gauraunteed to
> be higher quality than Linksys for a couple dozen dollars cheaper.
Linksys WRT54GS and Sveasoft firmware + fwbuilder. Don't diss Linksys: their
firmware is pu
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 4:23 pm, Richard Lyons wrote:
> The only ones that list (on that website at least) unix first and
include
> linux in the list of required OSs is the Netgear. That suggests that
> the DG834G is the one to go for. But I am not the first to travel
this
> road, so I wou
11 matches
Mail list logo
