On 15/07/2023 01:32, digitalmailing wrote:
Is there a reason why GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=false
in /etc/default/grub is commented by default after
installation of bookworm or grub?
After posting some links and references to Debian bugs in
Re: os-prober Just a Rant. Fri, 26 May 2023 09:38:37 +07
On Fri 14 Jul 2023 at 21:41:39 +0300, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> * 2023-07-14 20:32:41+0200, digitalmail...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > Is there a reason why GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=false in
> > /etc/default/grub is commented by default after installation of
> > bookworm or grub?
>
> Yes. Release notes docum
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 08:32:41PM +0200, digitalmailing wrote:
> I find this very annoying and inconvenient to change
> [GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER] back again after some updates.
Others have explained the "why". To stop your changes being
overwritten you can re-enable it in a .cfg file in
/etc/
digitalmailing wrote:
> Is there a reason why GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=false
> in /etc/default/grub is commented by default after
> installation of bookworm or grub?
Yes. It's a new change, mentioned in the upgrade notes.
https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.
* 2023-07-14 20:32:41+0200, digitalmail...@gmx.de wrote:
> Is there a reason why GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=false in
> /etc/default/grub is commented by default after installation of
> bookworm or grub?
Yes. Release notes document tells about it briefly:
5.1.11. GRUB no longer runs os-prober by
5 matches
Mail list logo
