Re: Re: via82cxxx

2004-07-21 Thread Frank Mulder
>> FATAL: Error inserting snd_seq_oss >> (/lib/modules/2.6.3-1-386/kernel/sound/core/seq/oss/snd-seq-oss.ko): >> Device or resource busy > >I dohn't know about the error. But I think you need to fire up >timidity (or maybe fluidsynth) ALSA will then direct the midi >events to timidity for software

Re: via82cxxx

2004-07-20 Thread csj
On 20. July 2004 at 4:19PM +0200, Frank Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I can see 'snd_rawmidi' and 'snd_seq_device', so I think it > >> should work. Any hints to make it work? > > > >You're lacking snd-seq-oss, the OSS compatibility module for > >the ALSA sequencer. > > Thank you for rep

Re: Re: via82cxxx

2004-07-20 Thread Frank Mulder
>> I can see 'snd_rawmidi' and 'snd_seq_device', so I think it should work. >> Any hints to make it work? > >You're lacking snd-seq-oss, the OSS compatibility module for the ALSA >sequencer. Thank you for replying. I have now tried this: modprobe snd-seq-oss, but it gives an error: FATAL: Error

Re: via82cxxx

2004-07-19 Thread Sebastian Kapfer
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:00:13 +0200, Frank Mulder wrote: [unable to open /dev/sequencer] > I can see 'snd_rawmidi' and 'snd_seq_device', so I think it should work. > Any hints to make it work? You're lacking snd-seq-oss, the OSS compatibility module for the ALSA sequencer. -- Best Regards, | Thi

Re: via82cxxx chipset question

2001-12-02 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
Once in debian galaxy, I heard Peter Jay Salzman say > approximately what would hdparm -tT report when udma is enabled? > rate of data transfer. mine is roughly 128MB/s for -T and 35 MB/s for -t for 40GB Maxtor drive. cheers, Chanop -- ,

Re: via82cxxx chipset question

2001-12-02 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
begin: Chanop Silpa-Anan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quote > Once in debian galaxy, I heard Cheryl Homiak say > > > It's possible this might get more answers on another list, but thought I'd > > try here first. > > I have a via82c597 rev 4 chipset and an Award bios. I have anabled the > > via82cxxx suppor

Re: via82cxxx chipset question

2001-12-02 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
Once in debian galaxy, I heard Cheryl Homiak say > It's possible this might get more answers on another list, but thought I'd > try here first. > I have a via82c597 rev 4 chipset and an Award bios. I have anabled the > via82cxxx support in my kernel, but perhaps I do not understand what > numbers

Re: Via82cxxx locked at 48kHz: solution

2001-11-19 Thread hanasaki
Will this be rolled into woody? when? I am curious about the backround. Is this a different source of code for supporting the chipset, as was used before? Peter De Wachter wrote: This problem is solved for me with version 1.9.1 of the via82cxxx_audio driver. It is not yet included with the

Re: Via82cxxx locked at 48kHz

2001-11-12 Thread Nikolai Hlubek
Hi again, in 2.4.3 it works with the same options that 2.4.6/9 ... doesn't work with. Just tried it. So it must be really a bug. Either in via82cxxx or pci quirks.c . I guess I will file a bugreport. Oh and sorry for the double-posting. I got and error-message when sending to this list and

Re: Via82cxxx locked at 48kHz

2001-11-12 Thread Peter De Wachter
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Heather Hunter wrote: > Hi there, > I have the following problem regarding the VT82C686A chipset > for sound output. > > I use the via82cxxx module in the kernel and > with kernel 2.4.3 everything worked fine. > All recent kernel versions (2.4.6 / 2.4.9) lock the audio play

Re: Via82cxxx locked at 48kHz

2001-11-12 Thread Paul Sargent
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 11:58:51AM +, Paul Sargent wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:55:57AM +0100, Nikolai Hlubek wrote: > > > I would be grateful for any suggestion, > > and please no "use alsa instead" replies. > > Nikolai > > I guess you've been onto the via-kernel driver list. That

Re: Via82cxxx locked at 48kHz

2001-11-12 Thread Paul Sargent
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:55:57AM +0100, Nikolai Hlubek wrote: > I would be grateful for any suggestion, > and please no "use alsa instead" replies. > Nikolai I guess you've been onto the via-kernel driver list. That seems to be the standard response on there. Odd for a development list. I've

Re: Via82cxxx locked at 48kHz

2001-11-12 Thread Emil Pedersen
nate wrote: > > Nikolai Hlubek said: > > > I would be grateful for any suggestion, > > and please no "use alsa instead" replies. > > Nikolai > > get a better soundcard. seriously. i have 2 Asus CUV4Xs with > the onboard VIA82CXXX chip. its a piece of crap. i tried it That's a simple solution.

Re: Via82cxxx locked at 48kHz

2001-11-11 Thread nate
Nikolai Hlubek said: > I would be grateful for any suggestion, > and please no "use alsa instead" replies. > Nikolai get a better soundcard. seriously. i have 2 Asus CUV4Xs with the onboard VIA82CXXX chip. its a piece of crap. i tried it with the kernel's drivers and with the commercial OSS and i

Re: via82cxxx

2001-07-17 Thread Igor Guida
On Monday 16 July 2001 20:09, Tony Godshall wrote: > > > I've got a question about sound configuration. > > > I know I have a VIA PCI audio controller : > > > I/O 220-22F > > > IRQ 5 > > > and it seems to be sound blaster compatible. > > > > > > What should I do to get it working ??? > > > > > > M

Re: via82cxxx

2001-07-16 Thread Tony Godshall
> > I've got a question about sound configuration. > > I know I have a VIA PCI audio controller : > > I/O 220-22F > > IRQ 5 > > and it seems to be sound blaster compatible. > > > > What should I do to get it working ??? > > > > Many thanks in advance, > > Olivier. > I had the same problem about

Re: via82cxxx

2001-03-13 Thread Patrick Barr
I had the same problem about 2 months ago the solution : install kernel 2.4.0 test 5 or better. I have test 5 on my machine right now(I'll get the latest kernel later on, when it's stablised maybe). just modprobe soundcore, ac97something and then via82cxxx. works like a charm Pat On Sat

Re: via82cxxx

2000-10-15 Thread Patrick Barr
I had the same problem about 2 months ago the solution : install kernel 2.4.0 test 5 or better. I have test 5 on my machine right now(I'll get the latest kernel later on, when it's stablised maybe). just modprobe soundcore, ac97something and then via82cxxx. works like a charm Pat On Sat

Re: via82cxxx

2000-10-13 Thread ESTEBAN P OSSES ANGUITA
hi! On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Olivier Billet wrote: > ESTEBAN P OSSES ANGUITA wrote: > > OK, thanks, that's what I'm trying now. > It may be a stupid question, but how is it that alsa installation > scripts search for includes in /usr/src/linux/include... that are > actually in /usr/include... ?

Re: via82cxxx

2000-10-13 Thread Olivier Billet
ESTEBAN P OSSES ANGUITA wrote: > > What should I do to get it working ??? > after one try, another try, and another ... etc... i installed ALSA ... > and it works vry good :) OK, thanks, that's what I'm trying now. It may be a stupid question, but how is it that alsa installation scripts sea

Re: via82cxxx

2000-10-13 Thread ESTEBAN P OSSES ANGUITA
hi ... On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Olivier Billet wrote: > Hi all ! > > I've got a question about sound configuration. > I know I have a VIA PCI audio controller : > I/O 220-22F > IRQ 5 > and it seems to be sound blaster compatible. i have one of this on my laptop ... AFAIK it is compatible, but i