Re: test, don't read

2002-11-25 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 07:04:42PM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On 2002.11.25 18:53 Daniel Pecos wrote: > > > OH MY GOD! I ACCIDENTALLY READ IT! MY EYES! MY EYES! THEY'RE BURNING! > A!! It must be your caps-lock key glowing. Just aim the keyboard away from you... -- Karl E

Re: test, don't read

2002-11-25 Thread Hugh Saunders
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 07:04:42PM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > OH MY GOD! I ACCIDENTALLY READ IT! MY EYES! MY EYES! THEY'RE BURNING! > A!! thats strange, mine are fine, do you need a new monitor?? hugh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns

Re: test, don't read

2002-11-25 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On 2002.11.25 18:53 Daniel Pecos wrote: OH MY GOD! I ACCIDENTALLY READ IT! MY EYES! MY EYES! THEY'RE BURNING! A!! :) -- Darryl L. Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Visit the Infobahn Offramp - "What do you care what other people think, Mr. Feynman?" -- T

Re: test don't read

1999-10-15 Thread Joe Block
On Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 10:17:47PM +0200, Jean-Yves BARBIER wrote: > test local to externel I don't mean to be a sphincter, but public mailing lists are NOT appropriate places to test your mail configuration. Already irritated because of the clueless folk who sent their unsubscribe messages to th