Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>>> How to configure static IP? network/interfaces as in [1] seem not to
>>> work because of a "connmand".
>>
>> connmand? The package "connman" is not contained in the default
>> installation of Debian.
> So what I th
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> How to configure static IP? network/interfaces as in [1] seem not to
>> work because of a "connmand".
>
> connmand? The package "connman" is not contained in the default
> installation of Debian.
Thank you for your help. Just to report m
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> How to configure static IP? network/interfaces as in [1] seem not to
>> work because of a "connmand".
>
> connmand? The package "connman" is not contained in the default
> installation of Debian.
>
>> What is "connmand", where can I learn more
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Steffen Dettmer safe for DHCP failures).
> [1]
> https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration#Configuring_the_interface_manually
> [2] /etc/network/interfaces:
> allow-hotplug eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.9.24
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> ga
Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> How to configure static IP? network/interfaces as in [1] seem not to
> work because of a "connmand".
connmand? The package "connman" is not contained in the default
installation of Debian.
> What is "connmand", where can I learn more about it, and why is it
> installed
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:45:22PM +0300, Ivan Kovnatsky wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have static IP assignment in /etc/network/interfaces:
> --
> # Wireless
> auto wlan0
> iface wlan0 inet static
> wpa-conf /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf
> address 192.168.1.49
> netmas
2009/9/5 Jesús M. Navarro :
> On Friday 04 September 2009 14:21:25 John O Laoi wrote:
>>> Verify that no dhcp process is running in the background. If there is
>>> none remove the network manager.
>> Indeed there was DHCP processes running:
>> # ps aux | grep dhc
>> root 3650 0.0 0.0
Hi, John:
On Friday 04 September 2009 14:21:25 John O Laoi wrote:
> > Verify that no dhcp process is running in the background. If there is
> > none remove the network manager.
>
> Thanks Frank.
> Indeed there was DHCP processes running:
>
> # ps aux | grep dhc
> root 3650 0.0 0.0 0
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 11:51 +0100, John O Laoi wrote:
> Some daemon is resetting the NIC address to null.
Verify that no dhcp process is running in the background. If there is
none remove the network manager.
Cheers
frank
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
m: Douglas Allan Tutty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 2:16 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: static IP
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:21:57AM -0300, Iuri Sampaio wrote:
>
> I’m trying to set up a internal static IP to my machine.
>
> My /etc/init.d/in
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:21:57AM -0300, Iuri Sampaio wrote:
>
> I’m trying to set up a internal static IP to my machine.
>
> My /etc/init.d/interfaces is:
You mean /etc/network/interfaces.
>
> # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
> # and how to activate them.
Iuri Sampaio wrote:
Hi,
I’m trying to set up a internal static IP to my machine.
My /etc/init.d/interfaces is:
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).
# The loopback network interfa
your /etc/network/interfaces file should be as follows
iface eth1 inet static
address 192.168.1.10
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.1.0
broadcast 192.168.1.255
gateway 192.168.1.1
further details go
http://david.decotigny.free.fr/libre/ibook2-debian/etc/network/interfaces
--
Thanks &
On 2007/07/02-11:21(-0300), Iuri Sampaio wrote :
> I’m trying to set up a internal static IP to my machine.
> My /etc/init.d/interfaces is:
>
Hi,
According to [01] the correct file to edit is /etc/network/interfaces.
Don't forget to specify the correct nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf
[01] http:/
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 05:30:42PM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
> As far as I know, they aren't even talking on debian-doc anymore. The
They are, but the list seems to be a clearinghouse(?) for patches
submitted against the debian documentation. Someone please correct me if
I'm wrong.
--
Chris.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:37:27PM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> Ok, Andrew
>
> So I leave it that way.
> Why I saw sometimes in some web sites this kind of static ips starting
> by 10.xxx.xxx.xxx and /number ?
>
> Jordi
http://aboutdebian.com/network.htm
--
Chris.
==
Don't forget to check that yo
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:27:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 04:44:41AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> > And Andrei:
> > > If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
> > > (Albert Einstein)
> >
> > That is a very good point.
> > When I had time (whe
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 04:44:41AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> And Andrei:
> > If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
> > (Albert Einstein)
>
> That is a very good point.
> When I had time (when will that happen??) I would like to make a site
> for people using Linux not to
And Andrei:
> If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
> (Albert Einstein)
That is a very good point.
When I had time (when will that happen??) I would like to make a site
for people using Linux not to suicide trying to understand it, as many
things are much simpler tha
Thanks Andrei
Thanks for such a good answer, now all is clear.
So long
Jordi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 28 Feb 2007 22:37:27 -0800
"Jordi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, Andrew
>
> So I leave it that way.
> Why I saw sometimes in some web sites this kind of static ips starting
> by 10.xxx.xxx.xxx and /number ?
There are three ranges of IP numbers reserved for "private" (as in
non-internet) us
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:10:22AM +0100, pobox wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:54:36AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > Try it from outside
> > your LAN -- use a friends machine or a library machine or get yourself
> > a free shell account somewhere and use links from that.
>
> Where c
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:54:36AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> Try it from outside
> your LAN -- use a friends machine or a library machine or get yourself
> a free shell account somewhere and use links from that.
Where can I get free shell account with enabled newtworking(links)?
--
Ok, Andrew
So I leave it that way.
Why I saw sometimes in some web sites this kind of static ips starting
by 10.xxx.xxx.xxx and /number ?
Jordi
On 28 feb, 23:00, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:41:19PM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> > Hi Andrew
>
> > Lucky th
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:41:19PM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> Lucky that you said me!
>
> > > 192.168.0.129 localhost
> >
> > note that this looks like a dhcp address assigned by your router. If
> > that changes then localhost won't resolve. You should probably setup
> > static ip in you
Hi Andrew
Lucky that you said me!
> > 192.168.0.129 localhost
>
> note that this looks like a dhcp address assigned by your router. If
> that changes then localhost won't resolve. You should probably setup
> static ip in your LAN.
Oh my, I think I did it bad.
I followed instructions a friend gav
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:53:38PM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> Thanks Joe.
>
> I edited the file hosts in /etc/ , and added this:
>
> 192.168.0.129 localhost
note that this looks like a dhcp address assigned by your router. If
that changes then localhost won't resolve. You should probably setup
stati
Thanks Joe.
I edited the file hosts in /etc/ , and added this:
192.168.0.129 localhost
so now when I type localhost, I get the server.
I did the Shields Up scan and reported all is very secure except I
have opened ports relating to http, https and ftp, wich I know I
opened for people to access
Jordi wrote:
Hi to all
I must thank all people here.
I called for a friend in ubuntu forum, he visited my public ip and got
the Xampp page!
So the server works fine !
The problem is that from inside my home, the router sends all visits
to its configuration. But from outside, they can visit my
How good!
So I think I have finished for the moment.
When I have a domain name, I will do the other thing
Thanks to all wise people for helping me to check all and fix the
stuff.
I saw many people at internet with this same "problem". For my part I
will explain in ubuntu forum so others don't g
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:17:35AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> Hi to all
>
> I must thank all people here.
>
> I called for a friend in ubuntu forum, he visited my public ip and got
> the Xampp page!
good, I suspected as much.
> So the server works fine !
>
> The problem is that from inside my home,
Hi to all
I must thank all people here.
I called for a friend in ubuntu forum, he visited my public ip and got
the Xampp page!
So the server works fine !
The problem is that from inside my home, the router sends all visits
to its configuration. But from outside, they can visit my server, not
th
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:24:41AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> Hi Nikhil,
>
> > This comment, together with the fact that you're using private IP
> > addresses (192.168.*.*) suggests to me that you have only one static IP
> > address. Is this correct?
>
> Yes I have just an ip, let's say 85.xx.xx.xx
>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:15:36AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> What you say here:
>
> > I'm guessing you're looking at a configuration problem in your
> > modem/router *or* your router recognises that the request to 85 is
> > coming from inside the LAN and so it serves up the config pag
Hi Andrew,
What you say here:
> I'm guessing you're looking at a configuration problem in your
> modem/router *or* your router recognises that the request to 85 is
> coming from inside the LAN and so it serves up the config page for the
> router instead of forwarding to the linux server. Try i
Jordi wrote:
> I have my ports forwaded right, but the router doesn't identify my Linux
> machine with the public ip for some reason.
If that is what you want you will need to put the modem in "bridge mode" I
don't know how to do that with a Speedtouch. If your ISP uses PPPoE you
will have to han
Hi Nikhil,
> This comment, together with the fact that you're using private IP
> addresses (192.168.*.*) suggests to me that you have only one static IP
> address. Is this correct?
Yes I have just an ip, let's say 85.xx.xx.xx
> Your router needs to redirect incoming requests on port 80 to your
Hi,
I've only just joined here, and have only seen this message, not the
preceding ones in the thread. I'll try to help, but my apologies if I end
up stating the obvious, or misunderstand the context.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Jordi wrote:
[...]
I think there is some place that identifies the r
Thanks for so many people trying to help.
I think we are centering the problem.
Please if you can help me, I will try to give the maximum of info I
can of what I am doing:
The router is in fack a modem/router. I can connect to internet even
if the other computer is turned off, and I have no other
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 10:21:49PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> I used jigdo-lite to get sarge-i386-1.iso (cd version), burnt the cd and
> installed the Debian Base System on a new computer. All went well
> except I cannot connect to our LAN. The DHCP setup says it has obtained
> an IP addres
Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>* Hardcode multiple addresses in the script, and have a token in the
>> form specify which address to mail to. For example, if the form
>> says address=FOO, you look it up $addresses[FOO] to get
>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
> What's the advantage here
At 05:31 PM 3/5/2004, Alan Shutko wrote:
You'll have to stop getting the email address from the form.
Ok, that sounds like a good idea. What I'm working on with this new release
is a web installer, so putting the recipient address in the code isn't a
problem. I do think it would be more proper t
Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alan, I'm working on a rewrite now and am concerned with properly
> doing things. Could you please advise on how to best prevent this type
> of exploit, given that a check of referer against a hard-coded
> hostname is not so good?
You'll have to stop ge
At 04:10 PM 3/5/2004, Alan Shutko wrote:
Checking against hostname has never been exceptionally secure.
You realize that someone could just send a different referer header?
Alan, I'm working on a rewrite now and am concerned with properly doing
things. Could you please advise on how to best prev
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:16:34PM -0600, Alan Shutko wrote:
> This is really a fairly common setup. As I mentioned, Windows and Mac
> don't generally really care what the hostname associated with their IP
> is. Few applications care. So DHCP servers just hand out IPs, and
Not true for Windows.
At 04:10 PM 3/5/2004, Alan Shutko wrote:
Checking against hostname has never been exceptionally secure.
You realize that someone could just send a different referer header?
Alan, I'm working on a rewrite now and am concerned with properly doing
things. Could you please advise on how to best prev
John Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am using dhcp3-client to pull the ip number and other assorted
> information. However, I can't get a hostname returned from the dhcp
> server.
It may not be sending one, since most clients don't care what their
hostname is. Use a script to use the "h
Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Besides the problem of breaking things that work, isn't this also a
> potential security issue?
Yes. Broken scripts can break.
Checking against hostname has never been exceptionally secure.
> It includes a provision for hard coding the domain it i
At 12:13 PM 3/5/2004, John Schmidt wrote:
Unfortunately, it is not my decision to make. If it were, I would not have
the dhcp server assign hostnames.
Besides the problem of breaking things that work, isn't this also a
potential security issue? For instance I offer a free formmailer script
that
On Friday 05 March 2004 09:00 am, Jonathan Schmitt wrote:
> >My university is switching everyone over from a static ip to one assigned
> > via dhcp. In addition, they are specifying the hostname for each of
> > these addresses. Unfortunately, we don't get an option to choose a
> > hostname. It s
John Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
My university is switching everyone over from a static ip to one assigned via
dhcp. In addition, they are specifying the hostname for each of these
addresses. Unfortunately, we don't get an option to choose a hostname. It
seems that the current mechanism within Debia
>My university is switching everyone over from a static ip to one assigned via
>dhcp. In addition, they are specifying the hostname for each of these
>addresses. Unfortunately, we don't get an option to choose a hostname. It
>seems that the current mechanism within Debian is to specify a hos
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 02:03:45 -0500, "Kelley Hilborn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Nothing works at first, and I occasionally get the error message with
> ifup:
> /etc/network/interfaces:14: duplicate option
> couldn't read interfaces file: "/etc/network/interfaces"
There you go. Which line does th
Kelley Hilborn wrote:
Okay, with the /etc/network/interfaces file looking like this:
auto lo eth0
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.0.101
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.0.1
This looks OK. Your card should be setup automatically upon bootu
Okay, with the /etc/network/interfaces file looking like this:
auto lo eth0
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.0.101
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.0.1
And my resolv.conf looking like this:(/etc/resolv.conf didn't exist I
had to create it)
On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 00:20:04 +0200, Kelley Hilborn wrote:
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.0.101
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> gateway 192.168.0.1
Looks OK to me.
> About all I can do at this point is ping my gateway computer.
Can you be more precise? Can you ping other
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003 16:46:18 -0500
"Kelley Hilborn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About all I can do at this point is ping my gateway computer. Am I
> missing
> something once again?
> One other thing, do I need to input a nameserver anywhere?
> If so, where?
You're on the right track.
man res
Kelley Hilborn wrote:
Okay, for my local LAN, I'm trying to set up a static IP address.
This is what my /etc/network/interfaces looks like
#
auto lo eth0
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.0.101
netmask 2
19, 1999 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: static IP on PPP
>Do a man on pppd and look at the 'local IP address:remote IP address'
>option. This would be set in /etc/ppp/peers/provider
>
>Hope this helps,
>
>luis wrote:
>>
>> hello
>>
>> how can i fix an
Sorry about my last message but it would seem I did not read. *deep
sigh* Its been a long weak.
luis wrote:
>
> hello
>
> how can i fix an IP using PPP?
>
> i have a fixed IP that i use when using eth0, and i would like to use
> it also when using ppp0
>
> i have tried putting the IP address
Do a man on pppd and look at the 'local IP address:remote IP address'
option. This would be set in /etc/ppp/peers/provider
Hope this helps,
luis wrote:
>
> hello
>
> how can i fix an IP using PPP?
>
> i have a fixed IP that i use when using eth0, and i would like to use
> it also when using pp
IP for ppp is assigned by your ISP pppd server, you cannot do anything localy.
You have to contact your ISP and ask for static IP, if they provide this kind
of service.
On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 07:17:37PM +0100, luis wrote:
> hello
>
> how can i fix an IP using PPP?
>
> i have a fixed IP that
You need to ask your ISP to put you in their DNS.
When someone tries to contact a host.domain.name, their computer sends a
request to their ISP's DNS server. That if that DNS knows the IP that goes
with that name then it sends the IP back to the person/program that
requested it. If not, it refe
On 12-Mar-99 Brian Clark wrote:
>
> Greetings:
>
> If anyone makes it through this email, I'd be very happy if you could help.
>:)
>
> I am a fairly new Linux user, trying to go static after many years of being
> dynamic. Of course by the Subject, I'm talking about my IP address.
>
> When I fi
a) be simple, leave ppp thinking you have a dynamic account, when you login you
get the same IP and no one is the wiser.
I have an IP (and name in DNS) assigned and you can hit me when I am logged in
however you please. Even have a MX record so mail sits and waits for me.
If login by dns name fa
65 matches
Mail list logo
